Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Prepack VS TestDriven.NET

Compare Prepack VS TestDriven.NET and see what are their differences

Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Prepack logo Prepack

Prepack is a partial evaluator for JavaScript.

TestDriven.NET logo TestDriven.NET

TestDriven.Net makes it easy to run unit tests with a single click, anywhere in your Visual Studio...
  • Prepack Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-09-02
  • TestDriven.NET Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-24

Prepack features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

TestDriven.NET features and specs

  • Integration with Visual Studio
    TestDriven.NET integrates seamlessly with Visual Studio, allowing developers to run tests directly from the IDE, which enhances productivity by keeping workflows within a single environment.
  • Supports Multiple Testing Frameworks
    TestDriven.NET supports a variety of testing frameworks such as NUnit and MSTest, giving developers flexibility in choosing their preferred testing tools.
  • Easy Test Execution
    Developers can execute tests with a simple right-click, streamlining the test running process and making it more user-friendly.
  • Code Coverage Analysis
    The tool provides code coverage information, helping developers identify untested parts of their codebase and improve test coverage.

Possible disadvantages of TestDriven.NET

  • Cost
    TestDriven.NET is a paid tool, and the licensing cost can be a disadvantage for smaller teams or individual developers with limited budgets.
  • Limited Support for Non-Windows Platforms
    Since TestDriven.NET is primarily designed for Visual Studio, its use is limited to Windows, which can be restrictive for teams using multiple operating systems.
  • Not Updated Frequently
    The tool does not receive updates as frequently as some other testing tools, which can lead to compatibility issues with the latest versions of Visual Studio or testing frameworks.

Prepack videos

+ Add

Prepack : Clif Bar Review! ALL FLAVORS in ONE VIDEO!*

More videos:

  • Review - sativa prepack shake review

TestDriven.NET videos

No TestDriven.NET videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Prepack and TestDriven.NET)

Prepack

TestDriven.NET

Code Analysis
45 45%
Code Analysis
55% 55
Code Review
45 45%
Code Review
55% 55
Code Coverage
45 45%
Code Coverage
55% 55
Code Quality
50 50%
Code Quality
50% 50

User comments

Share your experience with using Prepack and TestDriven.NET. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Prepack seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Prepack mentions (4)

  • LLRT: A low-latency JavaScript runtime from AWS
    If I understand it correctly, it exchanges execution speed (by not using JIT) for faster starts. Instead, they could pick up the old FB project https://prepack.io/ to optimize both start AND execution speed. It would be very interesting to see it together with node's snapshots: https://blog.logrocket.com/snapshot-flags-node-js-v18-8/, which reduces the start significantly. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • [AskJS] Are there any surviving alternatives to prepack?
    For those uninitiated, Prepack was a neat JavaScript code optimizer. It eliminated computations that could be done at compile time. https://prepack.io/ The project has been dead for quite a while, but it has valid use cases to this day. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Understanding the Performance Impact of Generated JavaScript
    Surely this is the job for something like https://prepack.io/. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Memoirs of a lone JavaScript developer PART 2 : Svelte. An awful implementation of an old idea.
    Some real examples in JavaScript can be seen on Prepack[2]. Consequently it is natural to wonder whether we can AOT compile components of client side frameworks, to achieve a reduction in the final bundle size, but also to increase application execution speed. Source: over 3 years ago

TestDriven.NET mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of TestDriven.NET yet. Tracking of TestDriven.NET recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Prepack and TestDriven.NET, you can also consider the following products

CodeRush - DevExpress CodeRush for Roslyn uses significantly less memory, works faster, and lets you start Visual Studio faster.

ReSharper - ReSharper is a productivity tool for visual studio that provides tools and features to help you manage your code.

Productivity Power Tools - Extension for Visual Studio - A set of extensions to Visual Studio 2012 Professional (and above) which improves developer productivity.

Visual Assist X - Visual Assist X dramatically reduces application development time with key new features and...

NDepend - NDepend is a Visual Studio tool to manage complex .NET code and achieve high code quality.

OzCode - OzCode is a reliable productivity tool that helps identify and fix bugs during C# debugging.

Loading...