Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

pre-commit by Yelp VS Codeship

Compare pre-commit by Yelp VS Codeship and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

pre-commit by Yelp logo pre-commit by Yelp

A framework for managing and maintaining multi-language pre-commit hooks

Codeship logo Codeship

Codeship is a fast and secure hosted Continuous Delivery platform that scales with your needs.
  • pre-commit by Yelp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-08
  • Codeship Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19

pre-commit by Yelp features and specs

  • Comprehensive Hook Management
    Pre-commit provides a robust framework to manage and configure git hooks in a standardized way, simplifying the process of ensuring code quality.
  • Language Agnostic
    Supports hooks written in all kinds of languages including Python, Ruby, JavaScript, etc., making it versatile and adaptable to any codebase.
  • Ease of Setup
    Installing and configuring pre-commit hooks is straightforward, often just involving the addition of a simple configuration file to the repository.
  • Version Control
    Pre-commit ensures that the same versions of hooks are consistently run across developers' environments by locking the version of each hook.
  • Centralized Configuration
    Project-wide configuration means that all contributors use the same hooks and settings, fostering code consistency and quality.

Possible disadvantages of pre-commit by Yelp

  • Learning Curve
    New users might face a learning curve initially when setting up a configuration file and understanding how to integrate it with existing workflows.
  • Performance Overhead
    Running hooks can add a noticeable delay when committing code, especially in larger projects with many hooks.
  • Dependency Management
    Some hooks might introduce additional dependencies that need to be managed within the project's environment.
  • Complex Configuration for Advanced Use
    While simple setups are easy, more complex configurations can become intricate and harder to manage.
  • Limited to Pre-defined Hooks
    If a desired hook isn't available, users may have to create their own, which can require additional effort and maintenance.

Codeship features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Codeship offers an intuitive interface that simplifies the setup process, making it accessible for developers who may not be experienced with continuous integration (CI) and continuous deployment (CD) tools.
  • Integration with Cloud Services
    Codeship integrates seamlessly with cloud services such as AWS, Google Cloud, and Heroku, facilitating easy deployment of applications.
  • Flexible Workflows
    The tool provides support for both Codeship Basic and Codeship Pro, allowing for flexibility in choosing between a more straightforward or a more customizable CI/CD workflow.
  • Docker Support
    Codeship Pro offers extensive support for Docker, allowing developers to use containerization strategies for their build and deployment processes.
  • Parallel Test Pipelines
    It supports parallel test pipelines, which can significantly speed up the testing process and reduce build times.
  • Slack Integration
    Codeship integrates with communication tools like Slack, enabling notifications and updates directly within team communication channels.

Possible disadvantages of Codeship

  • Cost
    Codeship can be more expensive compared to other CI/CD tools, particularly for larger teams or more complex projects that require more build resources.
  • Limited Customization
    For highly customized CI/CD processes, Codeship Basic might be limiting. Users may need to switch to Codeship Pro, which requires more configuration and a steeper learning curve.
  • Performance Bottlenecks
    Users have reported occasional performance bottlenecks, particularly under heavy workloads, which can slow down the CI/CD pipeline.
  • Plugin Ecosystem
    The plugin ecosystem for Codeship is not as extensive as some other CI/CD tools like Jenkins, potentially limiting its integration capabilities.
  • Learning Curve
    While Codeship Basic is relatively easy to use, Codeship Pro has a steeper learning curve, particularly for users who are new to Docker and advanced CI/CD practices.
  • Support
    Although support is available, some users have reported slower response times and less comprehensive support compared to other CI/CD platforms.

pre-commit by Yelp videos

No pre-commit by Yelp videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Codeship videos

LinuxFest Northwest 2017: Continuous Delivery to Microsoft Azure with Docker through Codeship

More videos:

  • Review - The Codeship -- Continuous Deployment made simple

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to pre-commit by Yelp and Codeship)
Git
100 100%
0% 0
Continuous Integration
0 0%
100% 100
Code Collaboration
100 100%
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using pre-commit by Yelp and Codeship. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare pre-commit by Yelp and Codeship

pre-commit by Yelp Reviews

We have no reviews of pre-commit by Yelp yet.
Be the first one to post

Codeship Reviews

The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
Codeship, a CI/CD platform based in the cloud, has an interface that is easy for users and it can integrate with numerous tools and services people are familiar with. It works well for different programming languages and platforms, which makes it suitable for many teams involved in development work.
Source: morninglif.com
Top 10 Most Popular Jenkins Alternatives for DevOps in 2024
CodeShip is a CloudBees SaaS platform that provides a managed CI/CD experience in the cloud. It’s designed to give control back to developers by providing a guided workflow for creating and maintaining CI/CD pipelines. This avoids much of the complexity that’s associated with Jenkins.
Source: spacelift.io
10 Jenkins Alternatives in 2021 for Developers
You could consider using CodeShip to help you to optimize CI/CD cloud deployment. CodeShip can be used by just about any type of development team that looks to increase the efficiency and automation of their code delivery. You can get started within minutes and gain access to an incredible amount of control when setting everything up. The customization options will seem...
The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
CodeShip is a hosted continuous integration and continuous delivery platform found by CloudBees. It provides fast feedback and customized environments to build applications. It provides integration with almost anything and is good at helping you scale as per your needs. It comes free for up to 100 monthly builds.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, pre-commit by Yelp seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 152 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

pre-commit by Yelp mentions (152)

  • How one bad coder made our stack unbreakable
    The time he hardcoded a token into the repo? → That’s when we finally added Git hooks and implemented secret scanning. - Source: dev.to / 9 days ago
  • Python MCP Remote Server — The Dawn of the Streamable HTTP Era ~ With a Minimalist Template Featuring uv / Docker / pytest ~
    Pre-commit: A framework for automatically running predefined checks (hooks) before Git commits (official website). pre-commit itself is also installed as a development dependency with uv pip install -e ".[dev,test]". To start using it, run pre-commit install once in the repository root. This sets up the Git hooks, and checks will run automatically on subsequent commits. - Source: dev.to / 17 days ago
  • Scalable Python backend: Building a containerized FastAPI Application with uv, Docker, and pre-commit: a step-by-step guide
    Pre-commit is a framework for managing and maintaining multi-language pre-commit hooks, ensuring consistency and quality in your codebase by running checks before a commit is finalized. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Crafting a Custom SAM Template for Your AWS Lambda Function, Resource, and Operations
    Just give you an idea of how to implement a template for serverless in your organization; you can create multiple cases and embed the practice of your organization to the template like pre-commit, cicd, lambda-layer-secret, lambda-layer-powertools and more. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • 12 Steps to Organize and Maintain Your Python Codebase for Beginners
    Instead of running these tools manually every time you make changes, you can automate the process with pre-commit hooks. Pre-commit hooks run automatically before each commit, blocking the commit if any tool fails. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
View more

Codeship mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Codeship yet. Tracking of Codeship recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing pre-commit by Yelp and Codeship, you can also consider the following products

Python Poetry - Python packaging and dependency manager.

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

EditorConfig - EditorConfig is a file format and collection of text editor plugins for maintaining consistent coding styles between different editors and IDEs.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

mypy - Mypy is an experimental optional static type checker for Python that aims to combine the benefits of dynamic (or "duck") typing and static typing.

Travis CI - Simple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools. Join hundreds of thousands who define tests and deployments in minutes, then scale up simply with parallel or multi-environment builds using Travis CI’s precision syntax—all with the developer in mind.