Software Alternatives & Reviews

pre-commit by Yelp VS Codecov

Compare pre-commit by Yelp VS Codecov and see what are their differences

pre-commit by Yelp logo pre-commit by Yelp

A framework for managing and maintaining multi-language pre-commit hooks

Codecov logo Codecov

Develop healthier code using Codecov's leading, dedicated code coverage solution. Try it free
  • pre-commit by Yelp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-08
  • Codecov Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-07

pre-commit by Yelp videos

No pre-commit by Yelp videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Codecov videos

Bring Codecov data to your next code review Sourcegraph Codecov extension

More videos:

  • Review - Codecov and CircleCI Orbs: Making Code Coverage Easy
  • Review - C++ Weekly - Ep 90 - Using Codecov and Project Badges

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to pre-commit by Yelp and Codecov)
Git
100 100%
0% 0
Code Coverage
0 0%
100% 100
Code Collaboration
100 100%
0% 0
Code Analysis
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using pre-commit by Yelp and Codecov. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare pre-commit by Yelp and Codecov

pre-commit by Yelp Reviews

We have no reviews of pre-commit by Yelp yet.
Be the first one to post

Codecov Reviews

11 Interesting Tools for Auditing and Managing Code Quality
Codecov is a comprehensive tool for managing code base as well as builds with a single utility. It analyses the pushed code, performs required checks, and auto-merges them if needed. Some of the more features listed below.
Source: geekflare.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, pre-commit by Yelp should be more popular than Codecov. It has been mentiond 142 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

pre-commit by Yelp mentions (142)

  • Implementing Quality Checks In Your Git Workflow With Hooks and pre-commit
    # See https://pre-commit.com for more information # See https://pre-commit.com/hooks.html for more hooks Repos: - repo: https://github.com/pre-commit/pre-commit-hooks rev: v3.2.0 hooks: - id: trailing-whitespace - id: end-of-file-fixer - id: check-yaml - id: check-toml - id: check-added-large-files - repo: local hooks: - id: tox lint name: tox-validation ... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • Embracing Modern Python for Web Development
    Pre-commit hooks act as the first line of defense in maintaining code quality, seamlessly integrating with linters and code formatters. They automatically execute these tools each time a developer tries to commit code to the repository, ensuring the code adheres to the project's standards. If the hooks detect issues, the commit is paused until the issues are resolved, guaranteeing that only code meeting quality... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago
  • EmacsConf Live Now
    Https://pre-commit.com/ can (and probably should) be used with any editor for such things. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • A Tale of Two Kitchens - Hypermodernizing Your Python Code Base
    Pre-commit Hooks: Pre-commit is a tool that can be set up to enforce coding rules and standards before you commit your changes to your code repository. This ensures that you can't even check in (commit) code that doesn't meet your standards. This allows a code reviewer to focus on the architecture of a change while not wasting time with trivial style nitpicks. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Things I just don't like about Git
    Ah, fair enough! On my team we use pre-commit[0] a lot. I guess I would define the history to be something like "has this commit ever been run through our pre-commit hooks?". If you rewrite history, you'll (usually) produce commits that have not been through pre-commit (and they've therefore dodged a lot of static checks that might catch code that wasn't working, at that point in time). That gives some manner of... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
View more

Codecov mentions (18)

  • To Review or Not to Review: The Debate on Mandatory Code Reviews
    If you're actively testing your codebase, which I hope you are, consider integrating a code coverage automatic checker such as codecov. This tool can alert if the coverage drops below a threshold. While I've had positive experiences with such tools, it's worth mentioning that the adoption process may pose some challenges. - Source: dev.to / 11 days ago
  • DevOps CI/CD Quick Start Guide with GitHub Actions 🛠️🐙⚡️
    The code coverage is printed out in the Coverage Report step but it is useful to track code coverage over time and have a repository badge which shows the current coverage percentage. There are many different code coverage and testing applications but we will use CodeCov. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Build an Open Source Project: Behind the Scenes
    Usually, you can't build a product without using various tools. Some of them can be free, and some of them can be commercial. The great benefit of working on Open Source projects is that a lot of companies with commercial products have special offers for non-commercial development. In the case of the "xq" utility, which is written in Go, I use GoLand IDE by JetBrains. I paid for it for several months but later... - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • CI CD strategies for UI apps and deployed services
    This YAML file details the CI implementation, including combined code coverage with CodeCov. For a simpler example without Cypress parallelization and code coverage, check the Github Actions YAML file of this template. The ideas presented here can be applied to any front-end application. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Almost 1000 applications this year, still no job.
    High unit-test coverage, and automated coverage reports on your repo by something like Codecov. Source: about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing pre-commit by Yelp and Codecov, you can also consider the following products

pre-commit - A slightly improved pre-commit hook for git

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

Python Poetry - Python packaging and dependency manager.

CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.

EditorConfig - EditorConfig is a file format and collection of text editor plugins for maintaining consistent coding styles between different editors and IDEs.

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.