Portable C Compiler VS Crow

Compare Portable C Compiler VS Crow and see what are their differences

Preferred Patron

Preferred Patron is the top Customer Loyalty Software Program for businesses in any industry of any size. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

Portable C Compiler

pcc is a C99 compiler which aims to be small, simple, fast and understandable.

Crow

A Fast and Easy to use microframework for the web.

Landing page //
2019-11-06

Landing page //
2023-08-03

Portable C Compiler

Website: pcc.ludd.ltu.se
$ Details: -

Edit details

Crow

Website: crowcpp.org
$ Details

Edit details

Portable C Compiler features and specs

Simplicity
PCC is designed to be simple and easy to understand, making it a good choice for educational purposes and for those learning about compilers.
Portability
As its name suggests, PCC is portable and can be easily adapted to different machine architectures, allowing for broad platform support.
Small Size
PCC has a smaller code base compared to other compilers like GCC, which makes it more lightweight and quicker to compile.
Legacy Code Support
PCC is useful for compiling older C code that may not comply with modern C standards, providing support for legacy systems.

Possible disadvantages of Portable C Compiler

Limited Features
PCC may lack some of the advanced features and optimizations found in more modern compilers like GCC or Clang.
Performance
The performance of code compiled with PCC may not be as optimized as that compiled with other contemporary compilers.
Community and Support
PCC has a smaller community and less active development compared to larger projects, potentially leading to fewer updates and less troubleshooting support.
Standard Compliance
PCC may not fully support the latest C standards, which could be a limitation for projects that need to adhere to modern specifications.

Crow features and specs

Asynchronous Handling
Crow supports asynchronous request handling, allowing for efficient management of high numbers of simultaneous connections.
Modern C++ Standards
Utilizes modern C++ features to ensure robust and efficient performance, leveraging C++11 and newer standards.
Simple and Lightweight
Designed to provide a web application framework with simplicity and minimal resource usage, making it suitable for embedded systems.
JSON Parsing
Includes built-in support for parsing and handling JSON, making it easier to work with web APIs and RESTful services.
Routing
Offers flexible routing capabilities, allowing for easy mapping of URLs to handlers with path parameters and regular expressions.

Possible disadvantages of Crow

Limited Ecosystem
Compared to more established frameworks, Crow has a smaller community and fewer third-party libraries and tools available.
Learning Curve
Requires familiarity with modern C++ features, which might be challenging for developers not well-versed in these standards.
Lack of Comprehensive Documentation
The documentation may not be as extensive or detailed as other frameworks, potentially making it harder to troubleshoot or learn advanced features.
Scalability
While suitable for many use cases, it might not be the best choice for very large-scale applications requiring extensive middleware functionality.

Portable C Compiler videos

No Portable C Compiler videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Crow videos

+ Add

The Crow (1994) - Movie Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Portable C Compiler and Crow)

Crow

IDE

66 66%

IDE

34% 34

Project Management

39 39%

Project Management

61% 61

Cloud Storage

0 0%

Cloud Storage

100% 100

Text Editors

100 100%

Text Editors

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Portable C Compiler and Crow. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Crow should be more popular than Portable C Compiler. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Portable C Compiler mentions (2)

Hand-optimizing the TCC code generator
Check PCC [1]. Official release was 2014, but development still active [2]. [1] http://pcc.ludd.ltu.se/. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
Research Unix v7 for Raspberry Pi
Works for me in qemu, but remember to provide an SD card image as mentioned in the README before you run "make tools/sd.img" - e.g. The one in the releases https://github.com/r1mikey/research-unix-v7/releases/download/v7-unix-pi1-20200212/v7-unix-pi1-20200212.img.xz Otherwise, qemu will start up complaining about a large number of invalid memory accesses. Unfortunately, there is no port of pcc (the portable C... - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

Crow mentions (12)

Transport agnostic Websocket library
I recommend Crow, it's a web framework that supports HTTP and Websockets. It's a bit larger than being only there to just let you compose or decode a packet. But I'm pretty sure everything you mentioned is there already :). Source: almost 3 years ago
Can I use C++ in the backend ?? Any frameworks there ??
I've been working on Crow for quite a while now, it's a pretty cool framework IMO. Source: almost 3 years ago
making a web server in c++?
If you really want to use C++, check out something like Crow, https://crowcpp.org/ and same thing, you can pass messages between the server and your application. Source: about 3 years ago
Crow finally gets rid of `CROW_MAIN` macro
Crow is a C++ web framework being developed and maintained by myself and a couple developers. Source: over 3 years ago
C or C++ as web app backend?
Https://crowcpp.org/ (C++ API similar to Python flask). Source: over 3 years ago