Software Alternatives & Reviews

POP (Prototyping on Paper) VS Macaw

Compare POP (Prototyping on Paper) VS Macaw and see what are their differences

POP (Prototyping on Paper) logo POP (Prototyping on Paper)

POP helps you make interactive prototype with ease. If you can draw, you can design apps.

Macaw logo Macaw

Macaw: The Code-Savvy Web Design Tool
  • POP (Prototyping on Paper) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-10-26
  • Macaw Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-15

POP (Prototyping on Paper) videos

No POP (Prototyping on Paper) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Macaw videos

DON’T buy a Macaw!!! Unless... || Mikey The Macaw

More videos:

  • Review - DO MACAWS MAKE GOOD PETS? | Must Knows About Macaw Parrots
  • Review - Macaw GT600s review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to POP (Prototyping on Paper) and Macaw)
Prototyping
46 46%
54% 54
Design Collaboration
48 48%
52% 52
Design Tools
45 45%
55% 55
Website Design
23 23%
77% 77

User comments

Share your experience with using POP (Prototyping on Paper) and Macaw. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing POP (Prototyping on Paper) and Macaw, you can also consider the following products

Invision - Prototyping and collaboration for design teams

Marvel - Turn sketches, mockups and designs into web, iPhone, iOS, Android and Apple Watch app prototypes.

Adobe Illustrator CC - Adobe Illustrator CC is a commercial vector graphics editor.

Axure RP - The prototyping and specification software used by 87% of the Fortune 100. Beyond mockups, design interactive prototypes for business solutions, websites, and applications.

Webflow - Build dynamic, responsive websites in your browser. Launch with a click. Or export your squeaky-clean code to host wherever you'd like. Discover the professional website builder made for designers.

UXpin - Design is really about solving problems. UXPin is the UX Design Platform that gets that right.