Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Polyhedra RDBMS VS Oracle TimesTen

Compare Polyhedra RDBMS VS Oracle TimesTen and see what are their differences

Polyhedra RDBMS logo Polyhedra RDBMS

Enea Polyhedra is a family of the two main products Polyhedra IMDB and Polyhedra FlashLite.

Oracle TimesTen logo Oracle TimesTen

TimesTen is an in-memory, relational database management system with persistence and...
  • Polyhedra RDBMS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-10
  • Oracle TimesTen Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-17

Polyhedra RDBMS features and specs

  • Real-Time Performance
    Polyhedra RDBMS is designed for real-time applications, providing high-speed data processing and low-latency response times, which is critical for systems requiring immediate data updates and retrieval.
  • In-Memory Storage
    The system stores data primarily in memory, allowing for quick access and updates, which significantly boosts performance for applications where speed is a priority.
  • Active-Active Replication
    Polyhedra supports active-active replication, ensuring high availability and resilience by allowing multiple database instances to handle read/write operations simultaneously.
  • Event-Driven Architecture
    The RDBMS supports an event-driven model that makes it suitable for dynamic environments, allowing the database to react to changes instantly without polling.
  • Flexible Data Model
    Polyhedra provides a flexible data model with dynamic schema changes, allowing developers to evolve database schema without unnecessary downtime.

Possible disadvantages of Polyhedra RDBMS

  • Memory Dependency
    The reliance on in-memory storage means that data is vulnerable to loss in the event of a system crash unless proper mechanisms are in place for data persistence.
  • Limited Ecosystem
    Polyhedra may have a smaller community and ecosystem compared to more widely-used databases like MySQL or PostgreSQL, potentially leading to limited third-party support and integrations.
  • Specialized Use Case
    The focus on real-time performance makes Polyhedra ideal for specific applications, but it may not be the best fit for general-purpose databases where the emphasis is on storage capacity or complex query support.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    As a proprietary solution, users may face challenges if moving away from Polyhedra in terms of both technical migration and licensing negotiations.
  • Cost
    Polyhedra is a commercial product, and licensing costs can be a concern for small businesses or projects with tight budgets compared to open-source alternatives.

Oracle TimesTen features and specs

  • High Performance
    Oracle TimesTen is an in-memory database providing extremely fast data access and transaction processing, which is beneficial for applications that require real-time performance.
  • Low Latency
    Since the database is stored in memory, data retrieval and manipulation are very quick, reducing latency significantly compared to disk-based databases.
  • Scalability
    TimesTen can be easily scaled to handle large volumes of data and transaction loads, supporting hybrid configurations with Oracle Database to extend scalability and reliability.
  • SQL Compatibility
    It supports SQL and PL/SQL, making it easier for developers experienced with Oracle databases to use TimesTen without a steep learning curve.
  • High Availability
    TimesTen offers features like replication and failover for high availability which is crucial for mission-critical applications.
  • Integration with Oracle Ecosystem
    TimesTen integrates well with other tools and products in the Oracle ecosystem, allowing for seamless operations across different Oracle platforms.

Possible disadvantages of Oracle TimesTen

  • Cost
    Oracle TimesTen can be expensive compared to some of its open-source alternatives, making it less attractive for smaller businesses or projects with limited budgets.
  • Hardware Dependency
    Being an in-memory database, it requires machines with large RAM capacities to store substantial datasets, which can be a limiting factor.
  • Complexity
    Setting up and managing TimesTen can be complex, especially when trying to optimize for performance and ensure data consistency across systems.
  • Limited Community Support
    Unlike more popular database systems, the community support for TimesTen is limited, which means troubleshooting and problem-solving might not be as straightforward.
  • Data Volatility
    Since TimesTen stores data in memory, there’s a risk of data loss in the event of power failures, despite having persistence features to mitigate this risk.

Polyhedra RDBMS videos

No Polyhedra RDBMS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Oracle TimesTen videos

My demo of Oracle TimesTen in memory DB with Free Developer Day tools with a VirtualBox VM appliance

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Polyhedra RDBMS and Oracle TimesTen)
Databases
34 34%
66% 66
Relational Databases
36 36%
64% 64
Network & Admin
44 44%
56% 56
NoSQL Databases
23 23%
77% 77

User comments

Share your experience with using Polyhedra RDBMS and Oracle TimesTen. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Polyhedra RDBMS and Oracle TimesTen, you can also consider the following products

Datomic - The fully transactional, cloud-ready, distributed database

Matisse - Matisse is a post-relational SQL database.

Valentina Server - Valentina Server is 3 in 1: Valentina DB Server / SQLite Server / Report Server

Datahike - A durable datalog database adaptable for distribution.

MarkLogic Server - MarkLogic Server is a multi-model database that has both NoSQL and trusted enterprise data management capabilities.

Google Cloud Datastore - Cloud Datastore is a NoSQL database for your web and mobile applications.