Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Pingdom VS Apache ActiveMQ

Compare Pingdom VS Apache ActiveMQ and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Pingdom logo Pingdom

With website monitoring from Pingdom you will be the first to know when your website is down. No installation required. 30-day free trial.

Apache ActiveMQ logo Apache ActiveMQ

Apache ActiveMQ is an open source messaging and integration patterns server.
  • Pingdom Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-16
  • Apache ActiveMQ Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-01

Pingdom features and specs

  • Real-time Monitoring
    Pingdom offers real-time, 24/7 monitoring for websites, servers, and applications, providing instant notifications if downtime or issues are detected.
  • Detailed Reporting
    Provides comprehensive reports and analytics about uptime, response time, and performance metrics, allowing users to make data-driven decisions.
  • Ease of Use
    User-friendly interface and easy setup process make it accessible for both technical and non-technical users.
  • Global Network
    Monitors your site from multiple locations worldwide, ensuring a broad perspective on performance across different regions.
  • Integrations
    Offers seamless integration with various tools such as Slack, PagerDuty, and others, enhancing the workflow efficiency for IT and DevOps teams.
  • Synthetic Monitoring
    Enables users to simulate user interactions with their website to identify issues before real users encounter them.
  • Root Cause Analysis
    Helps identify the root cause of any issues with its detailed incident analysis features.

Possible disadvantages of Pingdom

  • Pricing
    Pingdom can be expensive, especially for small businesses or startups, and some advanced features are locked behind higher-tier plans.
  • Limited Free Plan
    The free plan offers very limited functionalities, making it insufficient for businesses that need comprehensive monitoring.
  • Complex Alerts
    While the alert system is robust, setting up notifications and alerts can be complex and may require substantial configuration.
  • User Interface
    Some users find the user interface to be somewhat outdated and not as intuitive as other modern monitoring tools.
  • Mobile App Limitations
    The mobile app lacks some functionalities available on the web version, which can be inconvenient for users needing to manage their monitoring on the go.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite being user-friendly overall, some advanced features and customization options may have a steep learning curve for new users.

Apache ActiveMQ features and specs

  • Open Source
    ActiveMQ is open-source under the Apache License, making it free to use and modify. This can lead to cost savings compared to commercial solutions.
  • Wide Protocol Support
    ActiveMQ supports multiple messaging protocols, including AMQP, MQTT, OpenWire, Stomp, and others, allowing for flexible integration with various systems and applications.
  • Java Integration
    Written in Java, ActiveMQ integrates well with JVM-based applications and other Apache projects like Camel and Karaf, making it a good fit for Java-centric environments.
  • High Availability
    Features like broker clustering, network of brokers, and failover support provide robust high availability options, ensuring message delivery even in case of failures.
  • Performance and Scalability
    ActiveMQ can handle a large number of messages and users by scaling horizontally, making it suitable for both small and enterprise-level applications.
  • Admin Console
    ActiveMQ provides a web-based admin console for easy management and monitoring of the message broker, simplifying administrative tasks.

Possible disadvantages of Apache ActiveMQ

  • Complex Configuration
    The initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for newcomers. It often requires a steep learning curve to understand all the available options and optimizations.
  • Resource Intensive
    ActiveMQ can be resource-intensive, particularly in high-throughput scenarios, which may necessitate more robust hardware for optimal performance.
  • Latency
    In certain configurations, ActiveMQ may exhibit higher latency compared to other brokers, which might not make it suitable for use cases requiring real-time guarantees.
  • Java Dependency
    As a Java-based solution, ActiveMQ requires the JVM, which can be a downside for organizations that have standardized on other technology stacks.
  • Community Support
    While there is a community around ActiveMQ, it may not be as large or as active as those for other, similar open-source projects. This can lead to slower responses to issues and fewer community-based resources.
  • Documentation
    Though comprehensive, the documentation can sometimes be difficult to navigate, making it challenging for users to find specific information quickly.

Analysis of Apache ActiveMQ

Overall verdict

  • Apache ActiveMQ is generally considered a good choice for message brokering due to its comprehensive feature set, stability, and scalability. It is especially beneficial in environments where integration between different systems and technologies is necessary, thanks to its support of numerous messaging protocols.

Why this product is good

  • Apache ActiveMQ is a popular open-source message broker that is known for its flexibility and reliability. It supports multiple messaging protocols and offers features such as high availability, load balancing, and a robust set of messaging patterns. It is a mature project with a large user base and a supportive community. Its ability to integrate with various platforms and languages, along with its rich feature set, makes it a suitable choice for many applications requiring reliable message queuing.

Recommended for

    Apache ActiveMQ is recommended for enterprises looking for a reliable and scalable message broker, developers needing rich messaging functionality, and organizations that require robust support for various messaging protocols, including JMS, AMQP, STOMP, and MQTT. It is particularly well-suited for applications that need to distribute messages between different applications, languages, and platforms.

Pingdom videos

Pingdom Review (How To Monitor Your Website Uptime)

More videos:

  • Review - Web Page Speed Test Using Pingdom Tools | WP Learning Lab
  • Review - SolarWinds Pingdom Guided Tour

Apache ActiveMQ videos

No Apache ActiveMQ videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Pingdom and Apache ActiveMQ)
Website Monitoring
100 100%
0% 0
Data Integration
0 0%
100% 100
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Stream Processing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Pingdom and Apache ActiveMQ. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Pingdom and Apache ActiveMQ

Pingdom Reviews

Top 48+ Best Website Monitoring Software
Pingdom – Website Monitoring Made Easy. With website monitoring from Pingdom you will be the first to know when your website is down. No installation required. 14-day free trial.
#10 Best Website Monitoring Tools [2022]
Pingdom is one of the best website uptime monitoring tools. Pingdom is a popular paid tool that offers transaction monitoring, uptime, page speed, and web layout change monitoring. It offers real-time alerts for any type of outage or change in the website using various alert mechanisms.
10 Best Services to Monitor Website Uptime
Much like Pingdom, it revolves in this niche for decades, providing users not only with tools to monitor website performance but also with a regularly updated knowledge base with great insights on server’s outages and performance and a range of helpful free tools like Website Ping Machine, Realtime Blacklist Check, DMARC Analyzer, etc.
Source: designmodo.com
10 Best Website Monitoring Services and Tools of 2022
Pingdom is one of the most popular website uptime monitoring tools specially designed to make the website super fast and credible to the end-users. With the help of this website uptime monitoring tool, you will get alerts before any website performance-related issue occurs. Besides, it tests and examines all the parts of a web page efficiently to examine the internal issues.
Best New Relic Alternatives for Application Performance Monitoring (Cloud & SaaS)
Pingdom Server Monitor, which was formerly Scout Server Monitoring App which was acquired by Pingdom, has superior performance to New Relic, in particular when comparing response times, as seen in comparisons below. Ping Server Monitor comes ahead of New Relic in almost every single Response Time test and benchmark, beating it by almost 20x in terms of overhead.

Apache ActiveMQ Reviews

6 Best Kafka Alternatives: 2022’s Must-know List
ActiveMQ is a flexible, open-source, multi-protocol messaging broker that supports many protocols. This makes it easy for developers to use a variety of languages and platforms. The AMQP protocol facilitates integration with many applications based on different platforms. However, ActiveMQ’s high-end data accessibility capabilities are complemented by its load balancing,...
Source: hevodata.com
Top 15 Alternatives to RabbitMQ In 2021
It is a managed information broker for Apache ActiveMQ which has simple installation and it runs message broker in cloud. It doesn’t need any special look after regular management and maintenance of the message system. It is utilized to send bulk message services.
Source: gokicker.com
Top 15 Kafka Alternatives Popular In 2021
Apache ActiveMQ is a popular, open-source, flexible multi-protocol messaging broker. Since it has great support for industry-based protocols, developers get access to languages and platforms. It helps in connecting clients written in languages like Python, C, C++, JavaScript, etc. With the help of the AMQP protocol, integration with many applications with different platforms...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache ActiveMQ should be more popular than Pingdom. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Pingdom mentions (3)

  • Router vs. Modem - Random internet drops - how to determine culprit?
    So the way I troubleshoot which one is losing connection is by setting up 2 ping monitors with pingdom.com. Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Stumped by some odd results using Salesforce's /speedtest.jsp
    Basically, I'm getting results like these on average: https://imgur.com/X7RV1LH from running Salesforce's speedtest tool. It's a pretty new computer, brand new job for me (though I experienced this in an old job as well) so I don't have a great baseline. As you can see, everything is good except the download speeds. I've checked my speeds on fast.com and tested my google mesh wifi from directly within the Google... Source: almost 4 years ago
  • Sorrento Website has so much traffic its failing to load
    A lot of websites worldwide went down in the last hour. 30k websites according to pingdom.com the number has been slowly going back down. Source: almost 4 years ago

Apache ActiveMQ mentions (7)

View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Pingdom and Apache ActiveMQ, you can also consider the following products

UptimeRobot - Free Website Uptime Monitoring

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

StatusCake - Website Uptime Monitoring & Alerts – Free Unlimited Downtime Monitoring

IBM MQ - IBM MQ is messaging middleware that simplifies and accelerates the integration of diverse applications and data across multiple platforms.

Better Uptime - We call you when your website goes down

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.