Software Alternatives & Reviews

Phabricator VS Codecov

Compare Phabricator VS Codecov and see what are their differences

Phabricator logo Phabricator

Phacility - Phabricator

Codecov logo Codecov

Develop healthier code using Codecov's leading, dedicated code coverage solution. Try it free
  • Phabricator Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-13
  • Codecov Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-07

Phabricator videos

Phabricator code review session at Wikimedia Hackathon Zurich

More videos:

  • Review - Phabricator and Lando Brownbag July 2 2018
  • Review - Nizameddin Ordulu - Phabricator: An all-in-one tool for code review

Codecov videos

Bring Codecov data to your next code review Sourcegraph Codecov extension

More videos:

  • Review - Codecov and CircleCI Orbs: Making Code Coverage Easy
  • Review - C++ Weekly - Ep 90 - Using Codecov and Project Badges

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Phabricator and Codecov)
Code Collaboration
100 100%
0% 0
Code Coverage
0 0%
100% 100
Git
100 100%
0% 0
Code Analysis
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Phabricator and Codecov. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Phabricator and Codecov

Phabricator Reviews

We have no reviews of Phabricator yet.
Be the first one to post

Codecov Reviews

11 Interesting Tools for Auditing and Managing Code Quality
Codecov is a comprehensive tool for managing code base as well as builds with a single utility. It analyses the pushed code, performs required checks, and auto-merges them if needed. Some of the more features listed below.
Source: geekflare.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Codecov should be more popular than Phabricator. It has been mentiond 18 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Phabricator mentions (3)

  • Migrating from Phabricator to Azure Devops. Have some questions.
    My company has used Phabricator, which is an alternative to Azure Devops, for about 5 years. A few days ago they announced that the project won't be maintained anymore, so we are looking into alternatives. We have around 50 devs+product folks that use Phabricator at the moment. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Is there any "Unified HUB SOlution" in this Microservices era?
    You also mention Gitlab is close to what you would like - maybe Phabricator is even closer: https://phacility.com/phabricator/. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Is there an alternative to open project with the next characteristics ?
    Https://phacility.com/phabricator/ I think checks most of those boxes, maybe all. Source: about 3 years ago

Codecov mentions (18)

  • To Review or Not to Review: The Debate on Mandatory Code Reviews
    If you're actively testing your codebase, which I hope you are, consider integrating a code coverage automatic checker such as codecov. This tool can alert if the coverage drops below a threshold. While I've had positive experiences with such tools, it's worth mentioning that the adoption process may pose some challenges. - Source: dev.to / 12 days ago
  • DevOps CI/CD Quick Start Guide with GitHub Actions 🛠️🐙⚡️
    The code coverage is printed out in the Coverage Report step but it is useful to track code coverage over time and have a repository badge which shows the current coverage percentage. There are many different code coverage and testing applications but we will use CodeCov. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Build an Open Source Project: Behind the Scenes
    Usually, you can't build a product without using various tools. Some of them can be free, and some of them can be commercial. The great benefit of working on Open Source projects is that a lot of companies with commercial products have special offers for non-commercial development. In the case of the "xq" utility, which is written in Go, I use GoLand IDE by JetBrains. I paid for it for several months but later... - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • CI CD strategies for UI apps and deployed services
    This YAML file details the CI implementation, including combined code coverage with CodeCov. For a simpler example without Cypress parallelization and code coverage, check the Github Actions YAML file of this template. The ideas presented here can be applied to any front-end application. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Almost 1000 applications this year, still no job.
    High unit-test coverage, and automated coverage reports on your repo by something like Codecov. Source: about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Phabricator and Codecov, you can also consider the following products

GitLab - Create, review and deploy code together with GitLab open source git repo management software | GitLab

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

GitHub - Originally founded as a project to simplify sharing code, GitHub has grown into an application used by over a million people to store over two million code repositories, making GitHub the largest code host in the world.

CodeClimate - Code Climate provides automated code review for your apps, letting you fix quality and security issues before they hit production. We check every commit, branch and pull request for changes in quality and potential vulnerabilities.

BitBucket - Bitbucket is a free code hosting site for Mercurial and Git. Manage your development with a hosted wiki, issue tracker and source code.

Codacy - Automatically reviews code style, security, duplication, complexity, and coverage on every change while tracking code quality throughout your sprints.