Software Alternatives & Reviews

Perforce Helix QAC VS Cppcheck

Compare Perforce Helix QAC VS Cppcheck and see what are their differences

Perforce Helix QAC logo Perforce Helix QAC

Perforce Helix QAC is a handy, reliable, and highly rated Static Code Analysis solution that aids you in the process of finding vulnerabilities and problems within your C/C++ code.

Cppcheck logo Cppcheck

Cppcheck is an analysis tool for C/C++ code. It detects the types of bugs that the compilers normally fail to detect. The goal is no false positives. CppCheckDownload cppcheck for free.
  • Perforce Helix QAC Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-01
  • Cppcheck Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-13

Perforce Helix QAC videos

No Perforce Helix QAC videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Cppcheck videos

Cppcheck

More videos:

  • Review - Daniel Marjamäki: Cppcheck, static code analysis

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Perforce Helix QAC and Cppcheck)
Code Analysis
22 22%
78% 78
Code Coverage
21 21%
79% 79
Development
36 36%
64% 64
Code Review
18 18%
82% 82

User comments

Share your experience with using Perforce Helix QAC and Cppcheck. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Perforce Helix QAC and Cppcheck

Perforce Helix QAC Reviews

Top 9 C++ Static Code Analysis Tools
Helix QAC is yet another excellent code analysis tool by Perforce for C and C++ that is popular amongst “tightly regulated and safety-critical industries” such as automotive. It also automatically enforces coding standards, such as MISRA®, which ensures your code is compliant.

Cppcheck Reviews

Top 9 C++ Static Code Analysis Tools
Cppcheck is a popular, open-source, free, cross-platform static code analysis tool dedicated to C and C++. It is known for being easy to use and its simplicity is one of its pros. To get started with it you don’t have to do any adjustments or modifications, which is why it’s often recommended for beginners. It also has a reputation of reporting a relatively small number of...

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cppcheck seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 10 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Perforce Helix QAC mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Perforce Helix QAC yet. Tracking of Perforce Helix QAC recommendations started around Aug 2021.

Cppcheck mentions (10)

  • Configuring Cppcheck, Cpplint, and JSON Lint
    I dedicated Sunday morning to going over the documentation of the linters we use in the project. The goal was to understand all options and use them in the best way for our project. Seeing their manuals side by side was nice because even very similar things are solved differently. Cppcheck is the most configurable and best documented; JSON Lint lies at the other end. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Enforcing Memory Safety?
    Using infer, someone else exploited null-dereference checks to introduce simple affine types in C++. Cppcheck also checks for null-dereferences. Unfortunately, that approach means that borrow-counting references have a larger sizeof than non-borrow counting references, so optimizing the count away potentially changes the semantics of a program which introduces a whole new way of writing subtly wrong code. Source: 11 months ago
  • Static Code analysis
    For my own projects, I used cppcheck. You can check out that tool to get a feel. Depending on what industry your in, you might need to follow a standard like Misra. Source: about 1 year ago
  • How do you not shoot yourself in the foot ?
    Https://cppcheck.sourceforge.io/ (there are many other static analysis tools, I just haven't used them or didn't care for them). Source: about 1 year ago
  • Linting tool for prohibiting the use of specific std types
    Sounds like something that could simply be communicated with the team that writes the tests. Unless you have dozens of such classes. In that case, you could just use e.g. Cppcheck and add a rule (regular expression) that searches for usages of the forbidden classes. Source: over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Perforce Helix QAC and Cppcheck, you can also consider the following products

Parasoft C/C++test - Ensure compliance with a variety of functional safety, security, and coding standards in embedded C/C++ software.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...

lgtm.com - lgtm.com is a platform for code analytics.

Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free

Polyspace - Polyspace is a suite of static code analysis products developed by Matlab to help software developers, QA Testers, and engineers find critical problems in their code and fix them before they become a serious threat.