Software Alternatives & Reviews

PDQ Deploy VS pacman (package manager)

Compare PDQ Deploy VS pacman (package manager) and see what are their differences

PDQ Deploy logo PDQ Deploy

Deploy software quickly with PDQ Deploy. It's simple to install just about anything to multiple computers on your network.

pacman (package manager) logo pacman (package manager)

The pacman package manager is one of the major distinguishing features of ...
  • PDQ Deploy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-19
  • pacman (package manager) Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-07

PDQ Deploy videos

Installing PDQ Deploy and Your First Deployment

More videos:

  • Review - Best Alternative to SCCM: PDQ Deploy and PDQ Inventory
  • Review - PDQ Deploy Best Practices: Testing Your Deployments

pacman (package manager) videos

No pacman (package manager) videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PDQ Deploy and pacman (package manager))
Windows Tools
67 67%
33% 33
Front End Package Manager
Package Manager
64 64%
36% 36
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using PDQ Deploy and pacman (package manager). For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, pacman (package manager) seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 39 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

PDQ Deploy mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of PDQ Deploy yet. Tracking of PDQ Deploy recommendations started around Mar 2021.

pacman (package manager) mentions (39)

  • Been thinking of switching to linux but I am a noob
    However, that "pacman -S" command has lots of switches (see section 1.1.1 ==> https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/pacman ). Source: 5 months ago
  • Project on GitHub - Customizable Arch Linux Podman images based on the official Arch Linux Docker image
    Automatic installation of packages during building utilizes pacman and aurman with the supported "package sources" being:. Source: 9 months ago
  • A response to the Fedora 40 Privacy-Preserving Telemetry Proposal
    * Package management and DNF syntax usage are big topics. Follow the Arch Wiki example for the "pacman" package management tool ==> https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/pacman. Source: 10 months ago
  • Could someone make a Decky plugin that automates installing common dependencies?
    Should be possible as the Arch distro SteamOS is built on includes pacman. Source: 10 months ago
  • How to install optional dependencies
    All of this is explained in the wiki page. Source: 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PDQ Deploy and pacman (package manager), you can also consider the following products

Chocolatey - The sane way to manage software on Windows.

Synaptic - Please take a minute to watch our video, it gives an overview of Synaptic's role in financial services.

WAPT Community - Deploy your software and configurations, perform an inventory of your machines in real time, control Windows Updates and benefit from customized reporting of your IT assets

Just Install - just-install - The stupid package installer for Windows.

Pamac - Graphical Package Manager for Manjaro Linux (based on libalpm).

Scoop - A command-line installer for Windows