Based on our record, Parcel seems to be a lot more popular than Closure Compiler. While we know about 102 links to Parcel, we've tracked only 10 mentions of Closure Compiler. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
At first we wanted to just get rid of all the helper utilities. Keep only the kernel, but this would mean a loss of backward compatibility. We needed some efficient code processing instead with recomposition and tree-shaking. We needed a bundler. But which one? Our testing approach relies on targets, not sources. We rebuilt the project frequently, speed was critical requirement. In essence, we chose a solution... - Source: dev.to / 3 days ago
It runs using Parcel, very simple and easy to setup. The app has 3 files:. - Source: dev.to / 10 days ago
In the Changelog Podcast episode referenced above, Dan Abramov alluded to Parcel working on RSC support as well. I couldn’t find much to back up that claim aside from a GitHub issue discussing directives and a social media post by Devon Govett (creator of Parcel), so I can’t say for sure if Parcel is currently a viable option for developing with RSCs. - Source: dev.to / 22 days ago
Once you build a simple Vite backend integration, try not to complicate Vite's configuration unless you absolutely must. Vite has become one of the most popular bundlers in the frontend space, but it wasn't the first and it certainly won't be the last. In my 7 years of building for the web, I've used Grunt, Gulp, Webpack, esbuild, and Parcel. Snowpack and Rome came-and-went before I ever had a chance to try them.... - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
I’ve tried something similar on the frontend side: I decided to build a UI for Ollama.ai using only HTML, CSS, and JS (Single-Page Application). The goal is to learn something new and have zero runtime dependencies on other projects and NPM modules. Only Node and Parcel.js (https://parceljs.org/) are needed during development for serving files, bundling, etc. The only runtime dependency is a modern browser. Here's... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
I’m not exactly sure what you are trying to do but JavaScript Source Maps basically do this same thing with browsers and they use https://developers.google.com/closure/compiler/. Source: about 1 year ago
I'm using the Google Closure Compiler. I believe it has similar capabilities. Source: about 1 year ago
In a real world scenario you'd probably run the resulting JS through Closure Compiler. It would be nice to see how that affects both code size and performance. Source: over 1 year ago
Kind of funny that Google actually does have a product called the "Google Closure compiler". It creates different kinds of compilations though. https://developers.google.com/closure/compiler. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
Partially, depending on what's used it also optimizes the javascript code. See Google's closure compiler for more info. Source: about 2 years ago
Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.
JavaScript Obfuscator - JavaScript Obfuscator is a free online tool that obfuscates your source code, preventing it from being stolen and used without permission.
17track - All-in-one package tracking
Terser - JavaScript parser, mangler, optimizer and beautifier toolkit for ES6+
rollup.js - Rollup is a module bundler for JavaScript which compiles small pieces of code into a larger piece such as application.
UglifyJS - JavaScript minifier, beautifier, mangler and parser toolkit.