Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Parasoft C/C++test VS Shellcheck

Compare Parasoft C/C++test VS Shellcheck and see what are their differences

Parasoft C/C++test logo Parasoft C/C++test

Ensure compliance with a variety of functional safety, security, and coding standards in embedded C/C++ software.

Shellcheck logo Shellcheck

ShellCheck finds bugs in your shell scripts
  • Parasoft C/C++test Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-11
  • Shellcheck Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-26

Parasoft C/C++test features and specs

  • Comprehensive Analysis
    Parasoft C/C++test offers a wide array of testing and analysis tools, including static code analysis, unit testing, and coverage analysis, providing a robust environment for identifying and fixing issues early in the development process.
  • Automated Testing
    It supports automated testing, which helps in consistent execution of tests and allows developers to integrate testing into their continuous integration pipelines seamlessly.
  • Compliance with Standards
    The tool supports compliance with industry standards such as MISRA, CERT, and AUTOSAR, making it suitable for projects that require adherence to specific coding guidelines.
  • Integration with Development Environments
    Parasoft C/C++test easily integrates with popular development environments and build systems, enhancing the workflow without requiring major changes to existing processes.
  • Detailed Reporting
    The tool provides detailed reports and dashboards that offer insights into code quality, test coverage, and compliance, aiding in better decision making and prioritization.

Possible disadvantages of Parasoft C/C++test

  • Complexity
    Due to its comprehensive features, the tool can be complex to set up and configure, especially for teams that are new to using such an extensive testing suite.
  • Cost
    Parasoft C/C++test can be expensive, which may be a barrier for smaller teams or startups with limited budgets looking for cost-effective solutions.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    New users might find that there is a steep learning curve due to the tool's extensive functionality and features, requiring time and resources for training.
  • Performance Overhead
    When performing comprehensive analysis and testing, the tool might introduce performance overhead, potentially slowing down the development pipeline.
  • Customization Limitations
    While the tool provides extensive functionalities, some users might find it lacks customization options for specific use cases or integrated workflows.

Shellcheck features and specs

  • Static Code Analysis
    ShellCheck provides static analysis for shell scripts, allowing developers to catch errors and potential bugs without executing the script.
  • Comprehensive Error Detection
    It identifies a broad range of issues, including syntax errors, semantic errors, and best practice violations, helping to improve script reliability.
  • Suggestions for Improvements
    ShellCheck offers suggestions and fixes for many issues it detects, assisting developers in adhering to best practices.
  • Wide Compatibility
    ShellCheck supports various shell dialects, including Bash, Dash, and others, making it versatile for different environments.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, ShellCheck is freely available to everyone, with a community that contributes to its improvement and updates.
  • Integration with Editors
    ShellCheck integrates with various text editors and IDEs, enabling seamless error checking within the developer's workflow.

Possible disadvantages of Shellcheck

  • Learning Curve
    Users may need time to learn and understand ShellCheck's feedback, especially if they are not familiar with shell scripting best practices.
  • Potential Overhead
    While it provides valuable insights, using ShellCheck can add an overhead to the development process as scripts need to be checked and errors reviewed.
  • Not a Substitute for Testing
    ShellCheck should not be considered a substitute for thorough testing. Scripts still need to be executed to ensure functional correctness.
  • False Positives
    Like many static analyzers, ShellCheck may generate false positives, which can be misleading and require manual verification by the developer.
  • Resource Intensive for Large Scripts
    Analyzing very large or complex scripts might consume significant resources, potentially slowing down the workflow on older machines.

Parasoft C/C++test videos

Parasoft C/C++test

More videos:

  • Review - Parasoft C/C++test for Embedded Development

Shellcheck videos

Linting Your Bash Scripts with Shellcheck

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How To Configure ShellCheck in Jenkins
  • Review - Write Safer Scripts Using Shellcheck

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Parasoft C/C++test and Shellcheck)
Code Analysis
66 66%
34% 34
Code Coverage
59 59%
41% 41
Development
100 100%
0% 0
Code Review
53 53%
47% 47

User comments

Share your experience with using Parasoft C/C++test and Shellcheck. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Shellcheck seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 30 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Parasoft C/C++test mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Parasoft C/C++test yet. Tracking of Parasoft C/C++test recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Shellcheck mentions (30)

  • Haskell: A Great Procedural Language
    The other ones most people point to are https://pandoc.org and https://shellcheck.net. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • I reduced the size of my Docker image by 40% – Dockerizing shell scripts
    > Are "Random shell scripts from the internet" categorically worse than "random docker images from the internet"? > With the shell script, you can literally read it in an ... ... https://shellcheck.net. Can't do that if all of the work is hidden in a Dockerfile's RUN statement. I have my team commit shell scripts in shell script files, and the Dockerfile just runs that shell script. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • TermiC: Terminal C, Interactive C/C++ REPL shell created with BASH
    Nice script. It's... uhhh... Not shellcheck-clean. https://shellcheck.net/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • ChatGPT is a boon for linux noobs (but use with caution)
    Another fairly valuable resource is https://shellcheck.net which I use a bit more often than ChatGPT if I need help scripting. Source: about 2 years ago
  • I can't run the shell
    Always check your shell scripts at a site like http://shellcheck.net. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Parasoft C/C++test and Shellcheck, you can also consider the following products

Cppcheck - Cppcheck is an analysis tool for C/C++ code. It detects the types of bugs that the compilers normally fail to detect. The goal is no false positives. CppCheckDownload cppcheck for free.

Clang Static Analyzer - The Clang Static Analyzer is a source code analysis tool that finds bugs in C, C++, and Objective-C...

Coverity Scan - Find and fix defects in your Java, C/C++ or C# open source project for free

Polyspace - Polyspace is a suite of static code analysis products developed by Matlab to help software developers, QA Testers, and engineers find critical problems in their code and fix them before they become a serious threat.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

LDRA Testbed - Liverpool Data Research Associates (LDRA) is a provider of software analysis, test and requirements...