Software Alternatives & Reviews

Pants VS Ninja Build

Compare Pants VS Ninja Build and see what are their differences

Pants logo Pants

Build system by Twitter, Foursquare, and Square

Ninja Build logo Ninja Build

Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.
  • Pants Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-14
  • Ninja Build Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-14

Pants videos

8 Solid Outdoor Pants Reviewed + my top 3

More videos:

  • Review - 11 Excellent Travel Pants Reviewed
  • Review - 5.11 APEX Pants Review - Tactical Pants - 5.11 Tactical

Ninja Build videos

FORTNITE STW: HERE IS THE BEST NINJA BUILD (AFTER MONTHS OF TESTING)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Pants and Ninja Build)
DevOps Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Front End Package Manager
JavaScript Package Manager
Continuous Integration
23 23%
77% 77

User comments

Share your experience with using Pants and Ninja Build. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Ninja Build seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 22 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Pants mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Pants yet. Tracking of Pants recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Ninja Build mentions (22)

  • TypeScript's Successor is Waiting, and You'll Never Want to Turn Back
    Under the hood, Rescript uses a build system called Ninja. Ninja is similar to Make, but cross-platform and more minimal/performant. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Using Make – writing less Makefile
    Ninja was super easy to pick up even after using make for some time (10+ years). GN is just a ninja generator that is optional. https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/main/docs/quick_start.md https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Ask HN: What outdated tech are you still using and are perfectly happy with?
    Really? I thought most new projects were switching to ninja[^1] and have never used it. [^1]: https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • What was used to build C++ programs before Cmake?
    Ninja showed real promise for a while, but then CMake grew up and people stopped seeing a reason to leave it behind. Source: 10 months ago
  • Building and Running Pidgin and Finch 3
    Now that you have your build system all generated you can go ahead and build everything. By default Meson will use Ninja as the build tool. Ninja is similar to Make but much much faster. You can also generate additional build systems but that's outside of the scope of this post. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Pants and Ninja Build, you can also consider the following products

Bazel - Bazel is a tool that automates software builds and tests.

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...

Gradle - Accelerate developer productivity. Gradle helps teams build, automate and deliver better software, faster. DocsExplore the documentation of Gradle. Find installation ..