Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

pandoc VS Zsh Syntax Highlighting

Compare pandoc VS Zsh Syntax Highlighting and see what are their differences

pandoc logo pandoc

Pandoc is a Haskell library for converting from one markup format to another, and a command-line...

Zsh Syntax Highlighting logo Zsh Syntax Highlighting

Fish shell like syntax highlighting for Zsh.
  • pandoc Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-24
  • Zsh Syntax Highlighting Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-06

pandoc features and specs

  • Flexibility
    Pandoc supports a wide range of input and output formats, allowing users to convert between Markdown, HTML, LaTeX, PDF, DOCX, and more, providing versatile document management.
  • Ease of Use
    With simple command-line instructions, Pandoc makes it easy for users to convert documents without needing extensive programming or formatting knowledge.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, Pandoc is free to use and benefit from contributions across a broad community, which continuously improves its features and addresses bugs.
  • Customizability
    Pandoc offers template customization for document formatting, allowing users to define specific styles and structures for their outputs.
  • Extensive Documentation
    Pandoc provides comprehensive documentation and tutorials, making it accessible for new users and helpful for troubleshooting and exploring advanced functions.

Possible disadvantages of pandoc

  • Learning Curve
    New users might face a steep learning curve, especially if unfamiliar with command-line tools, as they need to understand the syntax and available options.
  • Performance
    For very large documents with complex formatting, Pandoc's performance might not be as efficient, potentially leading to increased processing time.
  • Limited GUI
    Pandoc primarily operates via the command line and lacks a fully-featured graphical user interface, which might be less convenient for some users accustomed to GUI-based applications.
  • Complexity in Advanced Features
    While powerful, some advanced features and customizations might require a deeper understanding of the tool and its scripting capabilities, which can be intricate.
  • Dependency on External Tools
    Converting documents into certain formats, like PDF, may depend on external tools (e.g., LaTeX), which need to be installed and configured separately.

Zsh Syntax Highlighting features and specs

  • Improved Readability
    Zsh Syntax Highlighting enhances the readability of command lines by adding color to different parts of the syntax, making it easier for users to identify errors and understand commands at a glance.
  • Error Detection
    The syntax highlighting feature quickly identifies and highlights syntax errors, helping users detect mistakes before running commands and potentially preventing faulty execution.
  • Intuitive Command Line Experience
    By color-coding commands and syntax elements, users have a visual cue about what parts of the command line might need attention, creating a more intuitive command-line experience.
  • Customization
    Users can customize the colors and styles used for syntax highlighting, allowing for a personalized experience that can fit with different themes and preferences.

Possible disadvantages of Zsh Syntax Highlighting

  • Performance Overhead
    The additional processing required for syntax highlighting can lead to increased resource consumption. In systems with limited resources, this might impact terminal performance.
  • Complex Configuration
    Setting up and customizing syntax highlighting can be complex, requiring users to dive into configuration files and understand Zsh plugins and themes, which may not be straightforward for beginners.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Some themes or plugins may not be fully compatible with zsh-syntax-highlighting, potentially causing conflicts or unexpected behavior.
  • Limited Support for Custom Languages
    While zsh-syntax-highlighting supports many common command-line tools and languages, it may not fully support syntax highlighting for less commonly used languages out-of-the-box, requiring additional customization.

pandoc videos

Who needs pandoc when you have Sphinx? An exploration of the parsers and builders of the Sphinx doc…

More videos:

  • Review - 0006 | Setting Up a Scholarly Writing Environment With Markdown, VSCodium and pandoc

Zsh Syntax Highlighting videos

No Zsh Syntax Highlighting videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to pandoc and Zsh Syntax Highlighting)
Documentation
74 74%
26% 26
Customer Feedback
0 0%
100% 100
Documentation As A Service & Tools
Knowledge Base
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using pandoc and Zsh Syntax Highlighting. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Zsh Syntax Highlighting should be more popular than pandoc. It has been mentiond 5 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

pandoc mentions (1)

  • Convert plain text to rich text
    If you really want to stop using Markdown to write with, then the best solution will be to use a proper conversion tool to turn these into word processing documents, such as DOCX or ODT, and then import that into Scrivener. I don't think (without plugins anyway) that Obsidian has any way of making this easier, but a good general purpose tool for this is Pandoc. Source: about 3 years ago

Zsh Syntax Highlighting mentions (5)

  • Make the zsh Prompt Go Faster
    Zsh can compile zsh scripts using the builtin zcompile into wordcode. This will have the effect of having faster parsing. The way we use this to get a faster prompt is to explicitly ask zsh to compile certain chunky plugins(think your syntax highlighters and completion plugins) into wordcode. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Finding Terminal Utopia
    Lastly, let’s make what commands we’re running easier to read, using zsh-syntax-highlighting. This script (which must be loaded before the zsh-history-substring-search above) will provide syntax highlighting of commands as you write them. This will help you avoid typos for incorrect commands, and make complex commands easier to read. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
  • Essential Terminal Settings for macOS
    Git clone https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh-syntax-highlighting.git ${ZSH_CUSTOM:-~/.oh-my-zsh/custom}/plugins/zsh-syntax-highlighting. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • [Question] What are the best plugins for zsh ?
    Two by far the most popular plugins are zsh-syntax-highlighting and zsh-autosuggestions. They are of high quality and quite useful. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Configuração do Windows para desenvolvimento
    Echo "Installing zsh-autosuggestions" Git clone https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh-autosuggestions ${ZSH_CUSTOM:-~/.oh-my-zsh/custom}/plugins/zsh-autosuggestions Echo "Installing zsh-syntax-highlighting" Git clone https://github.com/zsh-users/zsh-syntax-highlighting ${ZSH_CUSTOM:-~/.oh-my-zsh/custom}/plugins/zsh-syntax-highlighting Echo "Installing asdf" Git clone https://github.com/asdf-vm/asdf.git ~/.asdf. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing pandoc and Zsh Syntax Highlighting, you can also consider the following products

mdbook - Gitbook alternative in Rust

prism.js - Prism is a lightweight, extensible syntax highlighter, built with modern web standards in mind.

Asciidoctor - In the spirit of free software, everyone is encouraged to help improve this project.

GitBook - Modern Publishing, Simply taking your books from ideas to finished, polished books.

Docutils - Docutils is an open-source text processing system for processing plaintext documentation into...

MkDocs - Project documentation with Markdown.