Pale Moon VS Keycloak

Pale Moon Reviews

Keycloak Reviews

Pale Moon mentions (6)

• XUL Layout has been removed from Firefox

  The Palemoon browser [0] also still uses XUL, and is in many ways a continuation of XUL browsers (was originally forked from FF 29, updated with various components from FF 50+, and with many other tweaks). [0] https://palemoon.org. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

• All computers are garbage!

  The Pale Moon browser https://palemoon.org/ strikes a pretty good balance, IMO. They forked it from Firefox 24 and focused development narrowly on fixing Firefox's massive backlog of bugs and keeping up with core web standards. Source: over 1 year ago

• Browser sync—what are the risks of turning it on?

  Or use a browser that unlike Chromezilla browsers just uses a local encryption key for sync that's your responsibility to not forget, so even if their sync server is hacked no one can read your synced data. Source: about 2 years ago

• Firefox DYING is TERRIBLE for the Web

  Check it out: https://palemoon.org/. Source: about 2 years ago

• Pre configured setting for Firefox privacy, security, anti-fingerprinting.

  Or use Pale Moon, which is an updated, independent fork of Firefox without the retarded changes brought in after Australis (haters repeating ignorant lies that it is oLd aNd iNsEcUrE and who demonstrably have no clue what a software fork means can go sit on a cactus). Source: about 3 years ago

Keycloak mentions (4)

• Beyond the login page

  Most of the time nowadays, I prefer offloading this to an identity provider, using OpenID Connect or soon Federated Credential Management (FedCM), even if that means shipping an identity provider as part of the deliverables (I generally go with Keycloak, with keycloak-config-cli to provision its configuration). I'm obviously biased though as I work in IT services, developping software mainly for... - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

• Okta Says Hackers Stole Data for All Customer Support Users

  Yet another breach of Okta... Why are companies not running something like keycloak [1] themselves? Are administrative/maintenance costs too high or is it plausible deniability? [1] https://keycloak.org. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

• I built a ready-to-use auth server with TypeScript and Express.js

  I'd stick with a solution like https://keycloak.org in that instance. Source: about 1 year ago

• Authelia is an open-source authentication/authorization server with 2FA/SSO

  A few more projects in this space: - Keycloak (you won't get fired for picking this)[0] - CloudFoundry's UAA[1] - Gluu [2] - Keratin [3] - OpenUnison [4] - Dex[5] - Netlify's GoTrue[6] All of these solutions are a bit different but here are some of the axes: - Whether or not they function as an OAuth provider - Whether they're centered around application-user-login (email + password) or application auth (OAuth) or... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago