Software Alternatives & Reviews

Packet Sender VS Site monitoring

Compare Packet Sender VS Site monitoring and see what are their differences

Packet Sender logo Packet Sender

Packet Sender can send and receive UDP, TCP, and SSL on the ports of your choosing.

Site monitoring logo Site monitoring

Free open-source website monitoring software, easy to set up and use for monitoring web sites.
  • Packet Sender Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-29
  • Site monitoring Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-15

Packet Sender videos

Dan Dangle - Packet Sender

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Tello EDU Drone Swarming Tutorial with Packet Sender and Python

Site monitoring videos

No Site monitoring videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Packet Sender and Site monitoring)
Monitoring Tools
68 68%
32% 32
Website Monitoring
0 0%
100% 100
Log Management
100 100%
0% 0
Uptime Monitoring
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Packet Sender and Site monitoring. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Packet Sender seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Packet Sender mentions (4)

  • [Discussion] Send SMS (which is not 100% reliable) alternatives that don't require UI Interaction (which has it's own issues)?
    By googling around I found https://packetsender.com which is able to send-receive packets in various protocols - including UDP. It has desktop apps for Win, Mac and Linux (I used the Linux variant). In the desktop app, under the Tools menu, it has references to mobile apps for Android and iOS, but I had no luck locating them. Source: 11 months ago
  • UART command processor, best approach?
    I've slowly transitioned most of my company's projects over to this method for in house testing/calibration and it's made a world of difference. There is something to be said about being able to open putty or Packet Sender and get intimidate feedback on what is happening without having to bust out the debugger. Source: over 2 years ago
  • DUO MFA Issues
    RADIUS uses UDP ports so you can't test it via telnet / test-netconnect (powershell), but there are 3rd party tools like Packet Sender: https://packetsender.com/. Source: over 2 years ago
  • UDP Simulator
    Network Fuzzing is used to send network packets to test network security. You could try one of those. Here's another utility you might want to try. Source: almost 3 years ago

Site monitoring mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Site monitoring yet. Tracking of Site monitoring recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Packet Sender and Site monitoring, you can also consider the following products

socat - socat is a relay for bidirectional data transfer between two independent data channels.

Uptime Kuma - A fancy self-hosted monitoring tool.

netcat - Netcat is a featured networking utility which reads and writes data across network connections...

Statsignal - Statsignal is a simple and cost-effective way to monitor your website or server and publish a status page of your system.

PortMapper - Do you need to map a specific TCP or UDP port on your machine to another port on another machine?

UptimeRobot - Free Website Uptime Monitoring