Software Alternatives & Reviews

Packet Sender VS pwncat

Compare Packet Sender VS pwncat and see what are their differences

Packet Sender logo Packet Sender

Packet Sender can send and receive UDP, TCP, and SSL on the ports of your choosing.

pwncat logo pwncat

pwncat - netcat on steroids with Firewall, IDS/IPS evasion, bind and reverse shell, self-injecting shell and port forwarding magic - and its fully scriptable with Python (PSE)
  • Packet Sender Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-29
  • pwncat Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-29

Packet Sender videos

Dan Dangle - Packet Sender

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Tello EDU Drone Swarming Tutorial with Packet Sender and Python

pwncat videos

pwncat make stable Shell

More videos:

  • Review - À la découverte de PWNCAT-CS 🔗

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Packet Sender and pwncat)
Monitoring Tools
55 55%
45% 45
Log Management
56 56%
44% 44
Productivity
62 62%
38% 38
Network & Admin
58 58%
42% 42

User comments

Share your experience with using Packet Sender and pwncat. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Packet Sender seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Packet Sender mentions (4)

  • [Discussion] Send SMS (which is not 100% reliable) alternatives that don't require UI Interaction (which has it's own issues)?
    By googling around I found https://packetsender.com which is able to send-receive packets in various protocols - including UDP. It has desktop apps for Win, Mac and Linux (I used the Linux variant). In the desktop app, under the Tools menu, it has references to mobile apps for Android and iOS, but I had no luck locating them. Source: 11 months ago
  • UART command processor, best approach?
    I've slowly transitioned most of my company's projects over to this method for in house testing/calibration and it's made a world of difference. There is something to be said about being able to open putty or Packet Sender and get intimidate feedback on what is happening without having to bust out the debugger. Source: over 2 years ago
  • DUO MFA Issues
    RADIUS uses UDP ports so you can't test it via telnet / test-netconnect (powershell), but there are 3rd party tools like Packet Sender: https://packetsender.com/. Source: over 2 years ago
  • UDP Simulator
    Network Fuzzing is used to send network packets to test network security. You could try one of those. Here's another utility you might want to try. Source: almost 3 years ago

pwncat mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of pwncat yet. Tracking of pwncat recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Packet Sender and pwncat, you can also consider the following products

socat - socat is a relay for bidirectional data transfer between two independent data channels.

netcat - Netcat is a featured networking utility which reads and writes data across network connections...

PortMapper - Do you need to map a specific TCP or UDP port on your machine to another port on another machine?

Portfwd - Portfwd, Port Forwarding Daemon, stands for port forwarding daemon.

Komodia Relay - Free open source tool to perform TCP based session relay

tcpdump - tcpdump is a common packet analyzer that runs under the command line.