Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

PACE Suite VS ChucK

Compare PACE Suite VS ChucK and see what are their differences

PACE Suite logo PACE Suite

PACE Suite is an intelligent application packaging solution to work with packages of multiple formats, such as MSI, MSIX, AppX, App-V, ThinApp, and IntuneWin.

ChucK logo ChucK

A strongly-timed music programming language
  • PACE Suite Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-01
  • PACE Suite
    Image date //
    2024-02-19

PACE Suite is an intuitive application packaging solution aimed at simplifying and optimizing the end-to-end application packaging process and reducing the delivery time of high-quality software to end-users across thousands devices.

The solution provides a wide range of advanced features that allow covering all aspects of application packaging, from creating, editing, (re) packaging to testing and deploying packages. In addition, PACE Suite supports packages of multiple formats, such as MSI, MSIX, AppX, App-V, ThinApp, and IntuneWin.

PACE Suite provides users with rich functionality to capture installations remotely on multiple virtual machines (ESXi, Hyper-V, and VirtualBox) automate checks for package quality, security, and readiness, as well as create Windows Installer packages, publish MSI packages to SCCM, and much more.

Users can seamlessly integrate PACE Suite in the existing software environment with the help of the REST API.

  • ChucK Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-13

ChucK

Pricing URL
-
$ Details
-
Platforms
-
Release Date
2003 January

PACE Suite features and specs

  • Create Windows Installer package, edit it, create transforms, patches: Yes
  • Capture installations remotely on multiple virtual machines hosted on the ESXi, Hyper-V and VirtualBox hypervisors: Yes
  • Automate package quality, safety and deployment readiness checks: Yes
  • Create Windows Installer package, edit it, create transforms, patches: Yes
  • Repackage any installer into an MSI, MSIX, APPX or a virtualization format: Yes
  • Publish MSI package to Microsoft SCCM: Yes
  • Automate routine packaging tasks: Yes
  • Estimate MSI package complexity and generate package documentation: Yes
  • Create and edit virtual packages (App-V, ThinApp): Yes
  • Repackaging in Windows Sandbox: Yes
  • Editor for PSAppDeployToolkit: Yes
  • Build installer for CI/CD: Yes
  • Dialog box editor: Yes
  • PowerShell App Deployment Toolkit framework: Yes
  • Repackaging in Windows Sandbox: Yes
  • Repackaging in Docker: Yes

ChucK features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

PACE Suite videos

Publish MSI to SCCM - PACE Suite 5.5.x

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Edit MSI (Windows Services)

ChucK videos

Chuck - Worth a Watch? | TV Show Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to PACE Suite and ChucK)
Package Builder
100 100%
0% 0
Music Generation
0 0%
100% 100
Website Builder
100 100%
0% 0
3D
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using PACE Suite and ChucK. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ChucK seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

PACE Suite mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of PACE Suite yet. Tracking of PACE Suite recommendations started around Mar 2021.

ChucK mentions (12)

  • Is there any alternative to sonic pi?
    Check out ChucK also (https://chuck.cs.princeton.edu/). It's a very capable language and we'll documented. Source: about 1 year ago
  • Any programmers here? Curious how people have combined coding and music.
    I am a programmer by trade but don't often combine it with my musical endeavors. I briefly messed with https://chuck.cs.princeton.edu/ for live coding shows in college but honestly its very restrictive. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Is there music done using the generated patterns by a cross section of a 4d moving object?
    Also, a programming language geared towards music can help with process-driven composition. Max/MSP or ChucK for instance. Source: about 2 years ago
  • The Haskell School of Music (book) [pdf]
    I haven't coded music in haskell, but I've coded it in Max/MSP and ChucK and I enjoyed them both https://chuck.cs.princeton.edu/ https://cycling74.com/products/max. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Hacker News top posts: Sep 18, 2021
    ChucK: Strongly-Timed, Concurrent, and On-the-Fly Music Programming Language\ (15 comments). Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing PACE Suite and ChucK, you can also consider the following products

Advanced Installer - Advanced Installer is a Windows installer authoring tool for installing, updating, and configuring your products safely, securely, and reliably.

Sonic Pi - Sonic Pi is a new kind of instrument for a new generation of musicians. It is simple to learn, powerful enough for live performances and free to download.

InstallShield - If your software targets Windows, InstallShield is your solution.

SuperCollider - A real time audio synthesis engine, and an object-oriented programming language specialised for...

Master Packager - Master Packager is an application packaging tool to create and edit Microsoft Windows Installer (MSI) files and repackage other installation to MSI format.

Pure Data - Pd (aka Pure Data) is a real-time graphical programming environment for audio, video, and graphical...