Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Oxygen XML Editor VS fx

Compare Oxygen XML Editor VS fx and see what are their differences

Flowlu
All-in-one work management platform for team collaboration. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Oxygen XML Editor logo Oxygen XML Editor

Oxygen XML Editor provides a comprehensive suite of XML authoring and development tools.

fx logo fx

Command-line JSON processing tool
  • Oxygen XML Editor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-09
  • fx Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-23

Oxygen XML Editor features and specs

  • Comprehensive XML Support
    Oxygen XML Editor offers extensive support for XML and related technologies, making it suitable for working with XSLT, XQuery, XPath, and more. This makes it a versatile tool for developers dealing with XML data.
  • Schema Validation
    It provides robust validation against numerous schema languages including DTD, XML Schema, and Relax NG, ensuring data integrity and compliance with standards.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The editor features an intuitive and customizable user interface that helps both novices and experienced users navigate and edit XML documents efficiently.
  • Extensive Plugin and API Support
    Oxygen XML Editor supports a wide range of plugins and APIs, allowing for enhanced functionality and integration with other tools and workflows.
  • Cross-Platform Availability
    It is available on multiple platforms including Windows, macOS, and Linux, providing flexibility for users in different operating system environments.

Possible disadvantages of Oxygen XML Editor

  • High Cost
    One of the main disadvantages is its cost. The software is relatively expensive, which can be a barrier for small teams or individual developers.
  • Steep Learning Curve
    Given its extensive features and capabilities, new users may find it challenging to master all aspects of the editor without significant time investment.
  • Resource Intensive
    Oxygen XML Editor can be resource-heavy, potentially causing performance issues on lower-spec hardware.
  • Occasional Overload of Features
    For users who only need basic XML editing capabilities, the plethora of advanced features may be overwhelming and unnecessary.
  • Limited Support for Non-XML Formats
    While it excels at XML-related tasks, it is not as strong when dealing with non-XML file formats, which may require additional tools for comprehensive project management.

fx features and specs

  • Interactive JSON Viewer
    fx provides an interactive command-line JSON viewer that allows users to explore and manipulate JSON data intuitively.
  • Simple and Lightweight
    The tool is compact and easy to use, making it an excellent choice for users who need quick data examination without complex setup.
  • Scriptable
    Users can use JavaScript expressions to filter and transform JSON data, offering flexibility in data manipulation.
  • Integration
    fx can be easily integrated into shell scripts and other command-line tools due to its standard input/output operations.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Being a Node.js-based tool, fx is cross-platform and can run on multiple operating systems supporting Node.js.

Possible disadvantages of fx

  • Limited Functionality
    fx is designed primarily for viewing and transforming JSON, so it may not have advanced features found in full-fledged data processing tools.
  • JavaScript Requirement
    Users need to be familiar with JavaScript to effectively use fx's data transformation features, which might be a barrier for non-programmers.
  • Command-Line Only
    As a command-line tool, fx lacks a graphical user interface, which might be less appealing for users who prefer visual data interaction.
  • Performance
    Handling very large JSON files may lead to performance issues, as fx is primarily built for lightweight quick tasks.

Oxygen XML Editor videos

+ Add

oXygen XML Editor - Review Panel

More videos:

  • Review - Collaboration and Document Review in oXygen XML Editor 18

fx videos

+ Add

Suzuki FX | Suzuki Alto First Generation: Owner Review: Price, Specs & Features | PakWheels

More videos:

  • Review - Numark Mixtrack Pro FX & Platinum FX Review - The best new DJ controllers for beginners?
  • Review - The PC-FX - Review - Game Sack

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Oxygen XML Editor and fx)

Oxygen XML Editor

fx

Text Editors
100 100%
Text Editors
0% 0
File Manager
0 0%
File Manager
100% 100
Task Management
100 100%
Task Management
0% 0
File Explorer
0 0%
File Explorer
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Oxygen XML Editor and fx. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, fx seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 19 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Oxygen XML Editor mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Oxygen XML Editor yet. Tracking of Oxygen XML Editor recommendations started around Mar 2021.

fx mentions (19)

  • Command Line Tools I Like (2022)
    Coincidentally, yesterday I decided I needed a JSON TUI and landed on fx (https://github.com/antonmedv/fx), which seems to have come out of the Wave terminal project and looks quite similar to jless. Also uses vim keybindings. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • Show HN: Posting v1 – The modern HTTP client that lives in your terminal
    This is great, I could see myself using it daily. The only hindrance I've found so far is navigating large responses. Would be cool to have some way to collapse chunks of JSON (a la https://github.com/antonmedv/fx), or even just more vim key navigation, like G/gg, %, {/}, and search. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • I wrote JOSN, a command-line JSON browser
    Neat! You mentioned not getting the hang of jq, have you played with fx? Source: about 2 years ago
  • Show HN: Llama – Terminal File Manager
    This looks like something I'd use often. Thanks for creating it! For anyone who's not familiar, Anton is also behind the highly useful fx[0] for wrangling JSON data in the terminal. [0] https://github.com/antonmedv/fx. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • I'm developing a new command line tool for querying and transforming JSON files , called ~Q (pronounced "unquery"). My design goal is to create a tool that is powerful yet easy to use (aim to be more intuitive for users than existing tools such as jq). Let me know your thoughts and suggestions.
    I've been so fed up with jq's annoying syntax that I began thinking about developing something that can perform json operations in familiar syntax such as javascript but I ran into fx (https://github.com/antonmedv/fx) and it's been pretty great actually. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Oxygen XML Editor and fx, you can also consider the following products

Altova XMLSpy - The XMLSpy XML Editor is a powerful tool for editing XML and related technologies. It is the only XML Editor with patented SmartFix validation, enterprise-grade editors, converters, debuggers, and code generators.

jq - jq is like sed for JSON data - you can use it to slice and filter and map and transform structured...

XML Copy Editor - XML Copy Editor is a fast, free, validating XML editor.

jello - jello is a command line tool that filters JSON data using pure python syntax.

Stylus Studio - Stylus Studio® 2010 XML Enterprise Suite is an advanced XML Integrated Development Environment...

Solid Explorer - Solid Explorer is a powerful Android file manager featuring access to most popular cloud storages, root access and easy extensibility.

Loading...