Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

OWASP Dependency-Check VS Black Duck Software Composition Analysis

Compare OWASP Dependency-Check VS Black Duck Software Composition Analysis and see what are their differences

OWASP Dependency-Check logo OWASP Dependency-Check

OWASP dependency-check is open-source and can be used to scan Java and .NET applications via the CLI or using plugins.Read articles Continuous Security with OWASP Dependency Check and Integrating OWASP Dependency Check with Jenkins to CI/CD.

Black Duck Software Composition Analysis logo Black Duck Software Composition Analysis

Black Duck Software Composition Analysis (SCA) provides a solution for managing open source security, quality, and license compliance risks that comes from the use of open source and third-party code.
  • OWASP Dependency-Check Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-11
  • Black Duck Software Composition Analysis Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-20

OWASP Dependency-Check features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Black Duck Software Composition Analysis features and specs

  • Comprehensive Open Source Management
    Black Duck SCA provides a robust mechanism for identifying all open source components in your software, ensuring comprehensive management and oversight.
  • Vulnerability Detection
    It effectively identifies known vulnerabilities in your open source components, helping to mitigate security risks before they become issues.
  • License Compliance
    The tool helps ensure compliance with open source licenses, minimizing the risk of legal issues related to open source usage.
  • Detailed Reporting
    Black Duck offers detailed analysis and reporting capabilities, making it easier to understand the composition and risks of your software.
  • Continuous Monitoring
    It provides continuous monitoring of open source components to alert users of new vulnerabilities as they are discovered.

Possible disadvantages of Black Duck Software Composition Analysis

  • Complex Configuration
    Some users find the initial setup and configuration to be complex and time-consuming, especially in more intricate environments.
  • High Cost
    The pricing can be prohibitive for smaller companies or projects with limited budgets, as it is a premium tool.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might face a steep learning curve, requiring training to effectively utilize all of its capabilities.
  • Performance Overhead
    Running the tool can introduce performance overhead, potentially slowing down development processes when integrated into CI/CD pipelines.
  • False Positives
    Some users report occurrences of false positives in vulnerability reports, which can require additional time to verify and address.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to OWASP Dependency-Check and Black Duck Software Composition Analysis)
Security
30 30%
70% 70
Code Analysis
28 28%
72% 72
Open Source
54 54%
46% 46
Web Application Security
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using OWASP Dependency-Check and Black Duck Software Composition Analysis. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing OWASP Dependency-Check and Black Duck Software Composition Analysis, you can also consider the following products

Snyk - Snyk helps you use open source and stay secure. Continuously find and fix vulnerabilities for npm, Maven, NuGet, RubyGems, PyPI and much more.

SonarQube - SonarQube, a core component of the Sonar solution, is an open source, self-managed tool that systematically helps developers and organizations deliver Clean Code.

FOSSA - Open source license compliance and dependency analysis

Dependabot - Automated dependency updates for your Ruby, Python, JavaScript, PHP, .NET, Go, Elixir, Rust, Java and Elm.

Checkmarx - The industry’s most comprehensive AppSec platform, Checkmarx One is fast, accurate, and accelerates your business.

WhiteSource - Find & fix security and compliance issues in open source libraries in real-time.