Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Oracle TimesTen VS OrbitDB

Compare Oracle TimesTen VS OrbitDB and see what are their differences

Oracle TimesTen logo Oracle TimesTen

TimesTen is an in-memory, relational database management system with persistence and...

OrbitDB logo OrbitDB

OrbitDB is a serverless, distributed, peer-to-peer database.
  • Oracle TimesTen Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-17
  • OrbitDB Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-26

Oracle TimesTen features and specs

  • High Performance
    Oracle TimesTen is an in-memory database providing extremely fast data access and transaction processing, which is beneficial for applications that require real-time performance.
  • Low Latency
    Since the database is stored in memory, data retrieval and manipulation are very quick, reducing latency significantly compared to disk-based databases.
  • Scalability
    TimesTen can be easily scaled to handle large volumes of data and transaction loads, supporting hybrid configurations with Oracle Database to extend scalability and reliability.
  • SQL Compatibility
    It supports SQL and PL/SQL, making it easier for developers experienced with Oracle databases to use TimesTen without a steep learning curve.
  • High Availability
    TimesTen offers features like replication and failover for high availability which is crucial for mission-critical applications.
  • Integration with Oracle Ecosystem
    TimesTen integrates well with other tools and products in the Oracle ecosystem, allowing for seamless operations across different Oracle platforms.

Possible disadvantages of Oracle TimesTen

  • Cost
    Oracle TimesTen can be expensive compared to some of its open-source alternatives, making it less attractive for smaller businesses or projects with limited budgets.
  • Hardware Dependency
    Being an in-memory database, it requires machines with large RAM capacities to store substantial datasets, which can be a limiting factor.
  • Complexity
    Setting up and managing TimesTen can be complex, especially when trying to optimize for performance and ensure data consistency across systems.
  • Limited Community Support
    Unlike more popular database systems, the community support for TimesTen is limited, which means troubleshooting and problem-solving might not be as straightforward.
  • Data Volatility
    Since TimesTen stores data in memory, there’s a risk of data loss in the event of power failures, despite having persistence features to mitigate this risk.

OrbitDB features and specs

  • Decentralization
    OrbitDB is a peer-to-peer database system built on top of IPFS, meaning it does not rely on a central server. This enhances data availability and resilience against censorship.
  • Offline-first Operation
    Since OrbitDB is built on IPFS, it can operate without a constant connection to the internet, allowing data access and changes even when offline.
  • Versioning and Immutability
    It provides built-in support for versioning and immutability of data, ensuring that historical records can be maintained and easily accessed.
  • Eventual Consistency
    OrbitDB uses eventual consistency, which means all nodes will eventually reach the same data state. This is suitable for applications tolerant to eventual consistency rather than immediate data consistency.
  • Community and Open Source
    As an open-source project, OrbitDB benefits from community contributions and transparency, allowing for improved security, auditing, and flexibility in modifications.

Possible disadvantages of OrbitDB

  • Complex Synchronization
    Handling data consistency and synchronization in a decentralized manner can be complex, which may result in increased development and maintenance efforts.
  • Performance Overhead
    Running on a peer-to-peer network can introduce performance overhead due to factors like data propagation delays and potential network instability.
  • Limited Ecosystem Support
    Compared to more established databases, OrbitDB has a more limited ecosystem of tools and integrations, potentially requiring more custom development work.
  • Learning Curve
    Developers may face a steeper learning curve due to the decentralized nature and unique characteristics of OrbitDB and IPFS.
  • Eventual Consistency Trade-offs
    While eventual consistency can be a pro, it also means that applications requiring strict immediate consistency could face challenges when using OrbitDB.

Oracle TimesTen videos

My demo of Oracle TimesTen in memory DB with Free Developer Day tools with a VirtualBox VM appliance

OrbitDB videos

On Telemetry for InterPlanetary Systems (OrbitDB + IPFS)

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Oracle TimesTen and OrbitDB)
Databases
52 52%
48% 48
Relational Databases
57 57%
43% 43
Network & Admin
53 53%
47% 47
NoSQL Databases
55 55%
45% 45

User comments

Share your experience with using Oracle TimesTen and OrbitDB. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, OrbitDB seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Oracle TimesTen mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Oracle TimesTen yet. Tracking of Oracle TimesTen recommendations started around Mar 2021.

OrbitDB mentions (7)

  • Show HN: TeaTime – static distributed library powered by SQLite, IPFS and GitHub
    > (I'm looking into using Helia so that users are also contributing nodes in the network) I had to look that term up I was reminded of https://github.com/orbitdb/orbitdb#readme which seems like it may be much less rolling your own parts. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • How to make a crowdsourced distributed metadata database?
    Both use OrbitDB: Peer-to-Peer Databases for the Decentralized Web. JavaScript. MIT license. repo. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Release: New features for Nalli
    I think a wallet-agnostic memo solution is definitely the way. Having wallets that end up (partly) incompatible is only gonna hurt the UX. Maybe a decentralised DB solution like OrbitDB or GunDB can be the best way forward, although I haven't dove deeply into the docs yet. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Building a decentralized database
    Checkout this https://github.com/orbitdb/orbit-db peer-to-peer database for the decentralized Web. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Any suggestions to build a decentralized web app?
    I want to build a decentralized social media web app for a personal project, and I'm thinking on using IPFS. What tool, API, or library can get me set up without writing smart contracts or using blockchain solutions? I've heard that GunDB or OrbitDB are useful libraries- is that true? What are your thoughts and suggestions? Source: over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Oracle TimesTen and OrbitDB, you can also consider the following products

Valentina Server - Valentina Server is 3 in 1: Valentina DB Server / SQLite Server / Report Server

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

Datahike - A durable datalog database adaptable for distribution.

Datomic - The fully transactional, cloud-ready, distributed database

MarkLogic Server - MarkLogic Server is a multi-model database that has both NoSQL and trusted enterprise data management capabilities.

Matisse - Matisse is a post-relational SQL database.