Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

OpenID VS DotNetOpenAuth

Compare OpenID VS DotNetOpenAuth and see what are their differences

ComplyCube
Verify your customers in under 15 seconds anywhere in the world with a cutting-edge SaaS & API platform for Identity Verification and AML/KYC compliance. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

OpenID logo OpenID

OpenID is a safe, faster and easier way to log in to web sites.

DotNetOpenAuth logo DotNetOpenAuth

DotNetOpenAuth is a free-to-use compiled library that comes with the real support to your site visitor to login with the help of openIDs via getting control of the ASP.NET control onto the page.
  • OpenID Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-20
  • DotNetOpenAuth Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-03

OpenID features and specs

  • Single Sign-On
    OpenID allows users to log into multiple websites using a single set of credentials, simplifying the login process and reducing password fatigue.
  • Decentralized Authentication
    OpenID operates in a decentralized manner, meaning users can choose their identity providers, giving them more control over their online identity.
  • Improved User Experience
    By reducing the number of times users need to enter login information, OpenID can streamline the user experience across different platforms.
  • Enhanced Privacy
    OpenID allows users to manage their identity, providing them with the option to share only necessary information with websites.
  • Increased Security through Reduced Password Usage
    With fewer passwords to remember and enter, users can focus on creating stronger passwords for their OpenID accounts, potentially increasing overall security.

Possible disadvantages of OpenID

  • Reliance on Identity Provider
    Users depend heavily on their chosen OpenID provider. If the provider experiences downtime or a security breach, user's ability to log in to various services can be impacted.
  • Complexity in Implementation
    Implementing OpenID can be complex and requires significant development resources, which might be a barrier for smaller websites or developers.
  • Potential Privacy Concerns
    Although OpenID enhances privacy, it also puts pressure on identity providers to manage and protect user data adequately. Any data mishandling can affect user privacy.
  • Fragmentation of Standards
    The existence of multiple identity standards and specifications can create confusion and compatibility issues, leading to a fragmented user experience.
  • Dependent on Internet Access
    Like many online authentication methods, OpenID requires constant internet access, which can be a limitation in regions with unstable internet connectivity.

DotNetOpenAuth features and specs

  • Comprehensive Support
    DotNetOpenAuth supports multiple OAuth and OpenID versions, making it versatile for different authentication scenarios.
  • Security Features
    The library includes built-in features to handle security concerns, such as token encryption and secure transmission protocols.
  • Community and Documentation
    DotNetOpenAuth has a history of strong community support and extensive documentation, which can be helpful in learning and troubleshooting.
  • Integration with .NET Framework
    The library is designed to integrate seamlessly with the .NET framework, making it easy to implement in existing .NET applications.

Possible disadvantages of DotNetOpenAuth

  • Complexity and Learning Curve
    The library offers many features, which can make it complex and difficult to learn for newcomers.
  • Maintenance and Updates
    There have been concerns about the frequency of updates and maintenance, which might affect long-term usability and compatibility with new standards.
  • Limited .NET Core Support
    DotNetOpenAuth primarily targets the .NET Framework, with limited support for .NET Core, which may necessitate alternatives for modern applications.
  • Performance Overhead
    The extensive feature set can introduce performance overhead, particularly in scenarios that require lightweight solutions.

OpenID videos

+ Add

An Introduction To OpenID Connect

More videos:

  • Review - OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect (in plain English)
  • Review - What is Microsoft identity platform OpenID Connect certified? | One Dev Question: Hirsch Singhal

DotNetOpenAuth videos

No DotNetOpenAuth videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to OpenID and DotNetOpenAuth)

OpenID

DotNetOpenAuth

Identity And Access Management
72 72%
Identity And Access Management
28% 28
Network & Admin
55 55%
Network & Admin
45% 45
Security & Privacy
66 66%
Security & Privacy
34% 34
Tool
0 0%
Tool
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using OpenID and DotNetOpenAuth. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, OpenID should be more popular than DotNetOpenAuth. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

OpenID mentions (3)

  • 4 Cognito User Pools features you might not know about
    Cognito User Pools is a fully managed, OpenID Connect-compatible identity provider. It serves as a user directory service that handles authentication and authorization for application users. - Source: dev.to / 23 days ago
  • Top 7 API Authentication Methods Compared
    OpenID Connect builds on OAuth 2.0 by adding an identity layer, making it a go-to choice for applications that need both authentication and authorization. Developed by the OpenID Foundation, it's widely used by major players like Google, Microsoft, and Amazon. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Bluesky partners with Namecheap to power domains as usernames
    Certainly _buying_ domain names to be your identity is new, but OpenID[1] was doing basically that 15 years ago. Add a few meta tags to your website homepage, use that homepage as your "identity" to log in to websites, and they'd up your configured identity provider to do the login & request name/email/whatever else. You weren't locked in to a particular provider, since you logged in as _your_ webpage and could... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

DotNetOpenAuth mentions (1)

  • OpenID Provider open source library
    But if the OpenID server would be for a intranet or low number of requests, you can go ahread (in my opinion) and the post also recommends http://dotnetopenauth.net/ because has a OpenID provider and samples. Source: over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing OpenID and DotNetOpenAuth, you can also consider the following products

OAuth - OAuth is an open standard for authorization. It allows users to share their private resources (e.g.

ASP.NET Identity - ASP.NET Identity is a membership-based software system designed for the authentication and authorization of the users via building an ASP.NET application.

BugMeNot - BugMeNot is a free Internet service that provides usernames and passwords to allow users to bypass the registration process for websites.

humanID - humanID is a one-click anonymous SSO that provides users with an anonymous identity layer.

ASP.NET SAML - ASP.NET SAML is an open-source authentication utility that has been used for exchanging authentication and authorization data between the channels.

IdentityServer - An open-source, standards-compliant, and flexible OpenID Connect and OAuth 2.x framework for ASP.NET Core

Loading...