Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

OpenFOAM VS ClassMarker

Compare OpenFOAM VS ClassMarker and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

OpenFOAM logo OpenFOAM

OpenFOAM® - Official home of The Open Source Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) Toolbox.

ClassMarker logo ClassMarker

The ClassMarker online testing website, is a professional, easy to use, online quiz maker that marks your tests and quizzes for you. Create online quizzes free quiz maker. Web-based online testingWeb-based online testing service | Free quiz maker.
  • OpenFOAM Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-08-02
  • ClassMarker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-29

OpenFOAM features and specs

  • Open Source
    OpenFOAM is free to use and its source code is openly available under the GPL license, allowing for extensive customization and transparency in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations.
  • Extensibility
    Users can extend and modify the functionality of OpenFOAM to suit specific needs or integrate new algorithms, making it highly adaptable to various projects and research requirements.
  • Community and Support
    A robust community of users and developers contributes to forums, documentation, and collaboration, providing substantial peer support and shared knowledge.
  • Versatility
    OpenFOAM supports a wide range of physical models and simulation types, from simple incompressible flow to complex multiphase flows and chemical reactions, making it suitable for diverse applications.
  • Parallel Computing
    Optimized for parallel processing, OpenFOAM can run efficiently on high-performance computing systems, thereby handling large-scale simulations effectively.

Possible disadvantages of OpenFOAM

  • Steep Learning Curve
    OpenFOAM requires a significant investment of time to learn and master, as it involves understanding complex physics, programming concepts, and software-specific syntaxes.
  • Limited GUI
    Unlike some commercial CFD software, OpenFOAM lacks a sophisticated graphical user interface (GUI), necessitating users to rely on command-line input and scripting for setup and execution of simulations.
  • Documentation Quality
    Although community-driven, the documentation can sometimes be incomplete or outdated, making it challenging for new users to find reliable and up-to-date instructions and tutorials.
  • Performance Variation
    Performance and stability can vary depending on the specific simulation setup and hardware used, which may require users to conduct extensive testing and optimization.
  • Dependency Management
    Installing and maintaining OpenFOAM and its dependencies can be complex, often requiring specific versions of libraries and compilers to ensure compatibility and optimal performance.

ClassMarker features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    ClassMarker offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it simple for both instructors and students to use.
  • Customization Options
    The platform allows extensive customization of quizzes and tests including customizable question types, timed tests, and branding options.
  • Automated Grading
    ClassMarker provides automated grading features which save instructors a significant amount of time.
  • Security Features
    The platform offers robust security features such as the ability to randomize questions and answers, password protection, and secure test links.
  • Detailed Reporting
    Comprehensive reporting tools provide insights into performance metrics, allowing for detailed analysis of test results.

Possible disadvantages of ClassMarker

  • Pricing
    ClassMarker operates on a subscription basis, which can be costly, especially for smaller educational institutions or individual educators.
  • Limited Integration
    The platform offers limited integration options with other LMS (Learning Management Systems) and third-party applications.
  • Question Bank Limitation
    Users have reported that managing large question banks can become unwieldy and that the platform lacks more advanced organizational features.
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While the basic features are user-friendly, there can be a learning curve to make full use of the more advanced functionalities.
  • Internet Dependence
    Since ClassMarker is an online tool, it requires a stable internet connection for both test creation and taking exams, which might not be feasible for all users.

Analysis of OpenFOAM

Overall verdict

  • OpenFOAM is a powerful and versatile tool for CFD that is well-regarded in both academia and industry. Its open-source nature and comprehensive feature set make it a valuable resource for those needing customizability and advanced simulation capabilities.

Why this product is good

  • OpenFOAM is a popular open-source Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) tool that provides a wide range of features for simulating complex fluid flows.
  • It offers a flexible and extensible platform, allowing users to customize solvers and utilities to fit specific simulation needs.
  • The extensive library of pre-built solvers and utilities is suitable for various applications, from automotive to aerospace engineering.
  • Being open-source, it encourages collaboration and sharing of improvements, making it highly adaptable and continuously evolving.
  • Comprehensive documentation and a large user community contribute to reliable support and knowledge exchange.

Recommended for

  • Engineers and researchers in academia who require a robust CFD tool with customization capabilities.
  • Industry professionals involved in research and development who need flexible and cost-effective CFD solutions.
  • Advanced users with programming skills who want to leverage and extend its capabilities for specific project needs.

Analysis of ClassMarker

Overall verdict

  • Overall, ClassMarker is a highly regarded testing tool that is reliable, user-friendly, and adaptable to different testing needs. Its ability to create and distribute tests efficiently while providing valuable feedback and data analytics makes it a strong choice for anyone in need of an online assessment platform.

Why this product is good

  • ClassMarker is considered a good online testing platform due to its flexibility, ease of use, and comprehensive features. It offers a wide range of customization options for tests, such as multiple question types, timed quizzes, and the ability to upload media files. Its robust reporting tools allow users to track performance and generate detailed analytics. Additionally, ClassMarker provides secure testing environments, making it suitable for both educational institutions and businesses.

Recommended for

    ClassMarker is recommended for educators, trainers, and businesses seeking an efficient way to manage online assessments. It's particularly useful for teachers conducting exams, HR professionals managing employee evaluations, and trainers delivering certification tests.

OpenFOAM videos

What is OpenFoam? | Skill-Lync

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to run your first simulation in OpenFOAM® - Part 1 - tutorial
  • Tutorial - CFD tutorial for beginners | What is OpenFOAM? | SKILL-LYNC

ClassMarker videos

How to Use ClassMarker - A Free Online Test Maker

More videos:

  • Review - ClassMarker Review
  • Tutorial - ClassMarker How to Create an Online Exam 2019

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to OpenFOAM and ClassMarker)
Numerical Computation
100 100%
0% 0
Education
0 0%
100% 100
Technical Computing
100 100%
0% 0
LMS
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using OpenFOAM and ClassMarker. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare OpenFOAM and ClassMarker

OpenFOAM Reviews

We have no reviews of OpenFOAM yet.
Be the first one to post

ClassMarker Reviews

The 10 Best Online Test Maker Software
ClassMarker is yet another online test maker tool that offers secure, professional web-based online testing solutions for business, training & educational assessment. It is easy to use and offers several customization options.
10 Best Quiz Maker Software for Training and Fun
ClassMarker is another all-in-one quizzing solution on our list. It’s a cloud-based test builder that can be used by instructors and online storage for published assessments that students can log in to and take quizzes assigned to them. Being a kind of quiz-oriented variation of an LMS, ClassMarker offers educators access to detailed reports that can show results in real-time.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, OpenFOAM seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 19 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

OpenFOAM mentions (19)

  • OpenFOAM on Debian 12
    In openfoam.org, there is not compiled binaries for Debian (any version). So one should install it using docker (I prefer to do not use it) or by compiling the code from the source. I consider compiling from source, but I do prefer binaries. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Please help me get running OpenFOAM
    Hello I am a mechanical engineering student in my last year. So I made the wisest decision to learn OpenFOAM. But there is the catch. I have no idea how to use Linux or how to emulate Linux on Windows 10. I found a lot of videos on Youtube how to download an start OpenFOAM but every one of them was using different methods each time so I got confused. Can anyone please help or direct me? Thank you for your answers... Source: over 2 years ago
  • Step by Step (Written not Video) Tutorial for FEM with Air
    As far as air flow simulation, I got slightly farther with Open Foam than I did in FreeCAD directly. Still, I got in way over my skill level and stopped before getting anything useful. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Open source FEA tools instead of ANSYS Workbench and APDL
    There are two versions of openfoam, one closed source (which is the one I linked to in my original comment, my apologies about that) and the open source version. But what you're describing makes it sound like fenics might be your best option. Source: over 2 years ago
  • command not found and looping
    I suggest you install per the instructions at openfoam.com or openfoam.org instead of using apt. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

ClassMarker mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of ClassMarker yet. Tracking of ClassMarker recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing OpenFOAM and ClassMarker, you can also consider the following products

ANSYS Fluent - ANSYS engineering simulation and 3D design software delivers product modeling solutions with unmatched scalability and a comprehensive multiphysics foundation.

Treehouse - Treehouse is an award-winning online platform that teaches people how to code.

MATLAB - A high-level language and interactive environment for numerical computation, visualization, and programming

Pantheon - The professional website platform for Drupal & WordPress sites.

Wolfram Mathematica - Mathematica has characterized the cutting edge in specialized processing—and gave the chief calculation environment to a large number of pioneers, instructors, understudies, and others around the globe.

Docebo - Docebo Learning Management System is the best cloud LMS system on the market for online training. AICC SCORM xAPI compliant. Mobile elearning platform