Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
OW

Open Watcom VS Crow

Compare Open Watcom VS Crow and see what are their differences

Warmup Inbox
Warmup Inbox is a tool that automates the process of warming up your email inboxes, raising your sender reputation and inbox health automatically. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Open Watcom logo Open Watcom

Open Watcom is a project of the open source community to maintain and enhance the Watcom C, C++, and Fortran cross compilers and tools.

Crow logo Crow

A Fast and Easy to use microframework for the web.
  • Open Watcom Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-21
  • Crow Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-03

Open Watcom features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Crow features and specs

  • Asynchronous Handling
    Crow supports asynchronous request handling, allowing for efficient management of high numbers of simultaneous connections.
  • Modern C++ Standards
    Utilizes modern C++ features to ensure robust and efficient performance, leveraging C++11 and newer standards.
  • Simple and Lightweight
    Designed to provide a web application framework with simplicity and minimal resource usage, making it suitable for embedded systems.
  • JSON Parsing
    Includes built-in support for parsing and handling JSON, making it easier to work with web APIs and RESTful services.
  • Routing
    Offers flexible routing capabilities, allowing for easy mapping of URLs to handlers with path parameters and regular expressions.

Possible disadvantages of Crow

  • Limited Ecosystem
    Compared to more established frameworks, Crow has a smaller community and fewer third-party libraries and tools available.
  • Learning Curve
    Requires familiarity with modern C++ features, which might be challenging for developers not well-versed in these standards.
  • Lack of Comprehensive Documentation
    The documentation may not be as extensive or detailed as other frameworks, potentially making it harder to troubleshoot or learn advanced features.
  • Scalability
    While suitable for many use cases, it might not be the best choice for very large-scale applications requiring extensive middleware functionality.

Open Watcom videos

+ Add

2017-11-12 -- Hello World for Windows 9x-XP-7 with Open Watcom C

More videos:

  • Review - Integration of Open Watcom C++ compiler for ScaLib BDP project ( VTR-038 )

Crow videos

+ Add

The Crow (1994) - Movie Review

More videos:

  • Review - The Crow (1994) Retrospective / Review
  • Review - Siskel & Ebert Review The Crow

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Open Watcom and Crow)

Open Watcom

Crow

IDE
46 46%
IDE
54% 54
Project Management
0 0%
Project Management
100% 100
Email Marketing
100 100%
Email Marketing
0% 0
Cloud Storage
0 0%
Cloud Storage
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Open Watcom and Crow. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Crow should be more popular than Open Watcom. It has been mentiond 12 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Open Watcom mentions (2)

  • Revisiting Borland Turbo C/C++, A Great IDE back in the 90s – CodeProject
    Https://web.archive.org/web/20230315024557/http://www.columbia.edu/~em36/ntvdmx64.html Or just run dosbox for full and isolated emulation. Full circle, there's also djgpp and openwatcom for semi-modern retro development. https://www.delorie.com/djgpp https://openwatcom.org I collect retro compilers, programming books, software, and hardware. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • I want to start learning how to program DOS games
    I recommend using Open Watcom, particularly the Open Watcom V2 fork, to target 32-bit protected mode DOS, rather than 16-bit real mode. Source: almost 3 years ago

Crow mentions (12)

  • Transport agnostic Websocket library
    I recommend Crow, it's a web framework that supports HTTP and Websockets. It's a bit larger than being only there to just let you compose or decode a packet. But I'm pretty sure everything you mentioned is there already :). Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Can I use C++ in the backend ?? Any frameworks there ??
    I've been working on Crow for quite a while now, it's a pretty cool framework IMO. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • making a web server in c++?
    If you really want to use C++, check out something like Crow, https://crowcpp.org/ and same thing, you can pass messages between the server and your application. Source: about 3 years ago
  • Crow finally gets rid of `CROW_MAIN` macro
    Crow is a C++ web framework being developed and maintained by myself and a couple developers. Source: over 3 years ago
  • C or C++ as web app backend?
    Https://crowcpp.org/ (C++ API similar to Python flask). Source: over 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Open Watcom and Crow, you can also consider the following products

GNU Compiler Collection - The GNU Compiler Collection (GCC) is a compiler system produced by the GNU Project supporting...

Cutelyst - Qt-based web framework using the elegant approach of Catalyst framework

LLVM - LLVM is a compiler infrastructure designed for compile-time, link-time, run-time, and...

Oatpp - Zero-dependency, performance oriented Web Framework for Rapid development in C++

clang - C, C++, Objective C and Objective C++ front-end for the LLVM compiler.

Robin - Add interaction to your product with few lines of code.

Loading...