Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Open Science Framework VS Qiqqa

Compare Open Science Framework VS Qiqqa and see what are their differences

Open Science Framework logo Open Science Framework

Open Science Framework provides project management with collaborators, and project sharing with the public.

Qiqqa logo Qiqqa

Qiqqa is a free research and reference management software. It can be used in many organizational projects from the academic to the personal to the business endeavor. Read more about Qiqqa.
  • Open Science Framework Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-18
  • Qiqqa Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-03

Open Science Framework videos

What is the Open Science Framework all about?

More videos:

  • Review - Pre-Registering your Research with Open Science Framework

Qiqqa videos

Qiqqa: Your First 10 Minutes

More videos:

  • Review - موقع المبتعث العراقي:: كيفية استخدام برنامج كويكا Qiqqa

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Open Science Framework and Qiqqa)
Productivity
42 42%
58% 58
Research Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Education
100 100%
0% 0
Information Organization
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Open Science Framework and Qiqqa. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Open Science Framework and Qiqqa

Open Science Framework Reviews

We have no reviews of Open Science Framework yet.
Be the first one to post

Qiqqa Reviews

  1. The best research tool

    Qiqqa is by far the strongest solution for research and managing pdf's. Zotero, named as a comparison is weak as it does not allow pdf;s to be loaded into its interface - you need to use a pdf reader, which defeats its whole purpose. With Qiqqa documents in a library can be searched together. It has excellent maps of your libraries. It is not prefect, having a few glitches, but still is the only one of its kind.

    👍 Pros:    Excellent ocr and search|Multiple libraries|Search within a library|Still supported
    👎 Cons:    Can be a bit glitchy|Can slow down of stop responding|Appears to need a lot of memory|Support can be a bit slow / technical

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Open Science Framework seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 38 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Open Science Framework mentions (38)

  • So you wanna de-bog yourself
    Last night I happened to listen to an episode[1] on EconTalk where the author of the post (Adam Mastroianni, a psychologist) was a guest. Definitely worth a listen. Adam also supports "open science framework" (https://osf.io/) and publishes his research and related artifacts there, which I really appreciate! [1] https://www.econtalk.org/a-users-guide-to-our-emotional-thermostat-with-adam-mastroianni/. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Ask HN: How to discover new and interesting papers?
    Here are a few options to consider. First, Google Scholar. If you're logged into Google it will make a handful of recommendations on its front page. I've not really paid attention to how good the recommendations are. It says they're based on your Google Scholar record and alerts, so I guess you'll need both/one of those for it to work. https://scholar.google.com Second, Scopus from Elsevier (a company that plenty... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Bad numbers in the “gzip beats BERT” paper?
    It's customary to use OSF (https://osf.io/) on papers this "groundbreaking," as it encourages scientists to validate and replicate the work. It's also weird that at this stage there are not validation checks in place, exactly like those the author performed. There was so much talk of needing this post-"replication crisis.". - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • For members of "science twitter" who are opposed to Twitter's recently deployed content-wall - what are some alternative platforms that help academics openly share and discuss scientific research?
    2.Open Science Framework - A non-profit (but not open source) "GitHub for scientific research" [4]. OSF is an incredible team and and product, that helps scientists openly publish their papers, datasets, code, and other research outputs. Their website is also geared towards a technical audience too - they help scientists store information, but they don't have a feature that helps users discover discuss new... Source: 11 months ago
  • Análisis sobre el impacto de bajar los impuestos marginales - USS
    Our headline result is that a 10 percent increase in taxes is associated with a decrease in annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth of approximately −0.2 percent when bundled as part of a TaxNegative tax-spending-deficit combination. The same tax increase is associated with an increase in annual GDP growth of approximately 0.2 percent when part of a TaxPositive fiscal policy package. All of our data, output,... Source: 11 months ago
View more

Qiqqa mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Qiqqa yet. Tracking of Qiqqa recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Open Science Framework and Qiqqa, you can also consider the following products

Unpaywall - Legally read research papers behind paywalls.

Mendeley - Easily organize your papers, read & annotate your PDFs, collaborate in private or open groups, and securely access your research from everywhere.

figshare - Securely store and manage your research outputs in the cloud, or make them openly available and citable.

Zotero - Zotero is a free, easy-to-use tool to help you collect, organize, cite, and share research.

Open Access Button - Find free research & help make more of it publicly available

JabRef - Graphical Java application for managing bibtex (. bib) databases.‎JabRef · ‎JabRef Help · ‎JabRef | Blog · ‎OpenOffice/LibreOffice .