Open Build Service VS Privacy Guides

In Fedora, mock[0] is used to build packages in clean chroot for multiple of distros. In SuSE, Open Build Service[1] I used. [0]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_Mock_to_test_package_builds [1]: https://openbuildservice.org. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

I wish more software developers would use Open Build Service and create many packages for many distros: https://openbuildservice.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

OpenSUSE also provides it's own instance of openbuildservice. Source: 12 months ago

I see! So it is like a local https://openbuildservice.org/. Source: over 1 year ago

You can look at Open Build Service (OBS) and you can try it for free in OpenSuse OBS. Source: over 1 year ago

Are you thinking about making a centralized area to share resources? I think something similar to how privacyguides.org organizes stuff would work well. Source: about 1 year ago

As recommended by privacyguides.org, I'm trying to avoid that download token from the main link. I'm jw if those files on the FTP are just as safe/secure & all the same w/o the token still. Also, will I get one from future updates regardless? Source: about 1 year ago

Right, that's why I don't understand why Brave is recommended by privacyguides.org or pivacaytools.io. Source: about 1 year ago

The correct site is https://privacyguides.org The former team left Privacy Tools and that is now just arbitrary recommendations by one guy who mostly spruiks cryptocurrency bullshit. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

Good new! If you're giving a whole presentation, considered starting where the PG team recommends average ppl start, "threat modeling" and point them to the excellent privacyguides.org website for further action:. Source: over 1 year ago