Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Okta Single Sign-On VS Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Compare Okta Single Sign-On VS Azure Multi-Factor Authentication and see what are their differences

PlexTrac
PlexTrac is the #1 AI-powered platform for pentest reporting and threat exposure management, helping cybersecurity teams efficiently address the most critical threats and vulnerabilities. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Okta Single Sign-On logo Okta Single Sign-On

Okta Single Sign-On is the leading independent cloud company with thousands of customers across global industries.

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication logo Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication helps safeguard access to data and applications while meeting user demand for a simple sign-in process.
  • Okta Single Sign-On Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-12
  • Azure Multi-Factor Authentication Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19

Okta Single Sign-On features and specs

  • Centralized Access Management
    Okta SSO provides a centralized platform for managing user access across various applications, simplifying the process for IT administrators and enhancing security by having a single point of control.
  • User Experience
    With Okta SSO, users benefit from a seamless login experience, requiring only one set of credentials to access all their applications, reducing the likelihood of forgotten passwords and improving productivity.
  • Security Enhancements
    Okta offers advanced security features, such as multi-factor authentication (MFA) and adaptive authentication, to bolster the protection against unauthorized access and increase overall security posture.
  • Integration Capabilities
    The platform supports a wide range of integrations with various applications and services, allowing organizations to easily incorporate Okta SSO into their existing IT infrastructure.
  • Scalability
    Okta SSO is designed to scale with an organization, supporting a growing number of users and applications without significant performance issues, making it suitable for businesses of all sizes.

Possible disadvantages of Okta Single Sign-On

  • Cost
    Okta SSO can be expensive for small businesses or startups, especially when incorporating additional features or scaling up to accommodate more users and applications.
  • Complexity in Setup
    The initial setup and configuration process of Okta SSO can be complex and time-consuming, requiring expertise and planning to ensure proper deployment and integration.
  • Reliance on Third-Party Service
    By using Okta, organizations place trust in a third-party service for critical authentication processes, which can be a concern if there are service outages or data breaches.
  • Customization Limitations
    Some users may find limitations in the level of customization offered by Okta, as it provides standard configurations that may not meet the unique needs of every organization.

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication features and specs

  • Enhanced Security
    Azure MFA adds an additional layer of security by requiring users to verify their identity through multiple methods, reducing the risk of unauthorized access.
  • Flexible Authentication Options
    It supports various authentication methods such as phone calls, text messages, app notifications, and hardware tokens, providing flexibility for users.
  • Integration with Microsoft Services
    Seamless integration with other Microsoft services and Azure Active Directory ensures a cohesive security solution across different Microsoft platforms.
  • Compliance Support
    Helps organizations meet compliance requirements by providing an additional layer of security that is often mandated by regulations like GDPR, HIPAA, etc.
  • User-friendly
    Designed to be straightforward for end-users, reducing the friction typically associated with multi-factor authentication processes.
  • Conditional Access Policies
    Enables the configuration of conditional access policies to enforce MFA for specific scenarios, balancing security needs and user convenience.

Possible disadvantages of Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

  • Cost
    While some features are available for free, comprehensive usage of Azure MFA can incur additional costs depending on the Azure AD licensing model.
  • Setup Complexity
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex, especially for organizations without a dedicated IT team.
  • Reliance on Internet Connectivity
    Most verification methods require an internet connection, which can be a drawback in environments with unstable or unreliable internet access.
  • Potential User Resistance
    Some users may find the authentication process cumbersome or may resist changes to the login process, requiring additional user education and support.
  • Dependency on External Devices
    Authentication methods like text messages or app notifications depend on users having access to their mobile devices, which can be problematic if a device is lost or stolen.
  • Integration Challenges with Non-Microsoft Services
    While Azure MFA integrates well with Microsoft services, integration with third-party or non-Microsoft applications may require additional configuration and support.

Analysis of Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Overall verdict

  • Azure Multi-Factor Authentication is a reliable and effective solution for enhancing security within Microsoft environments and beyond. It is widely recognized for its comprehensive features and seamless integration capabilities, making it a strong choice for organizations looking to implement MFA.

Why this product is good

  • Azure Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) is considered good due to its robust security features, ease of integration with existing Microsoft services, and its ability to support a wide range of verification methods such as phone calls, text messages, and authenticator apps. It enhances security by requiring two or more pieces of evidence to verify a user's identity, reducing the risk of unauthorized access. Additionally, it offers flexibility and scalability, making it suitable for various organizational needs.

Recommended for

    Azure Multi-Factor Authentication is recommended for organizations using Microsoft's cloud services, such as Azure and Office 365, as well as for businesses that prioritize security and need to protect sensitive information and access against unauthorized use. It is particularly suited for enterprises that require a scalable and versatile MFA solution.

Okta Single Sign-On videos

No Okta Single Sign-On videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication videos

+ Add

How to register for Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Okta Single Sign-On and Azure Multi-Factor Authentication)

Okta Single Sign-On

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication

Identity And Access Management
26 26%
Identity And Access Management
74% 74
Security & Privacy
100 100%
Security & Privacy
0% 0
Two Factor Authentication
0 0%
Two Factor Authentication
100% 100
Identity Provider
64 64%
Identity Provider
36% 36

User comments

Share your experience with using Okta Single Sign-On and Azure Multi-Factor Authentication. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Azure Multi-Factor Authentication seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Okta Single Sign-On mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Okta Single Sign-On yet. Tracking of Okta Single Sign-On recommendations started around Nov 2022.

Azure Multi-Factor Authentication mentions (2)

  • MFA for Outlook Online on cell phone
    This is the answer, more detail: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/active-directory/authentication/concept-mfa-howitworks. Source: about 3 years ago
  • What do you do if you lost your phone with Microsoft Authenticator?
    Make sure that you back-up the active app-configuration, this way you have an easier way to recover; make sure you are allowed to verify using more than an authenticator, more here. Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Okta Single Sign-On and Azure Multi-Factor Authentication, you can also consider the following products

Infisign.io - Transforming Identity & Access Management

Google Authenticator - Google Authenticator is a multifactor app for mobile devices.

OneLogin - On-demand SSO, directory integration, user provisioning and more

Authy - Best rated Two-Factor Authentication smartphone app for consumers, simplest 2fa Rest API for developers and a strong authentication platform for the enterprise.

Oracle Access Management Suite - Oracle Access Management Suite is Oracle’s industry-leading solution for securing both modern and traditional applications and data, as well as non-IT digital assets, from unauthorized access.

Duo Security - Duo Security provides cloud-based two-factor authentication. Duo’s technology can be deployed to protect users, data, and applications from breaches, credential theft, and account takeover.

Loading...