Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Okta Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication VS Centrify Zero Trust Privilege

Compare Okta Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication VS Centrify Zero Trust Privilege and see what are their differences

ComplyCube
Verify your customers in under 15 seconds anywhere in the world with a cutting-edge SaaS & API platform for Identity Verification and AML/KYC compliance. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Okta Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication logo Okta Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication

Multi-factor authentication is becoming the standard. Secure your apps and VPN with strong MFA for adaptive, risk-based authentication.

Centrify Zero Trust Privilege logo Centrify Zero Trust Privilege

What is Zero Trust Privilege?
  • Okta Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-11
  • Centrify Zero Trust Privilege Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-20

Okta Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication features and specs

  • Enhanced Security
    Okta Adaptive MFA provides an extra layer of security by requiring additional forms of verification beyond just a password, making it more difficult for unauthorized users to gain access.
  • User-Friendly
    It offers a seamless user experience with various factor options such as biometrics, SMS, and email, reducing the friction commonly associated with multi-factor authentication.
  • Context-Aware
    Adaptive MFA can adjust security requirements based on context, such as the user's location, device, and behavior, providing a more nuanced and efficient security approach.
  • Compliance
    Helps organizations meet regulatory and compliance requirements such as GDPR, HIPAA, and other industry standards by implementing robust security measures.
  • Scalability
    Designed to work well for organizations of all sizes, it can easily scale with the growth of the company, accommodating more users and higher security demands.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Okta can integrate with a wide range of applications and services, both on-premises and cloud-based, providing a unified and cohesive security strategy.

Possible disadvantages of Okta Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication

  • Cost
    The pricing structure may be costly for small businesses or startups, which could be prohibitive for companies with limited IT budgets.
  • Complexity
    Implementation and management of adaptive MFA can be complex, requiring technical expertise and potentially increasing the burden on IT staff.
  • User Resistance
    Some users may find multi-factor authentication cumbersome and may resist the additional steps required, leading to potential productivity loss.
  • Dependency on Devices
    Since the system often relies on user devices for additional verification, issues like lost or damaged devices can disrupt access and require additional support.
  • Latency Issues
    In some cases, the extra steps required for authentication can introduce latency, affecting user experience particularly in time-sensitive applications.
  • Limited Offline Capability
    If there is no internet connectivity, some methods of multi-factor authentication offered by Okta may not function, potentially preventing access.

Centrify Zero Trust Privilege features and specs

  • Enhanced Security
    Centrify Zero Trust Privilege adopts a 'never trust, always verify' approach, minimizing the risk of unauthorized access by continuously authenticating users and devices.
  • Granular Access Control
    The platform offers fine-grained access controls, allowing organizations to specify permissions for individual users and roles, reducing potential security vulnerabilities.
  • Comprehensive Visibility
    Centrify provides detailed auditing and monitoring of privileged sessions, enabling organizations to have a clear view of who accessed what and when, aiding in compliance and security assessments.
  • Automation and Scalability
    The solution can be automated for regular administrative tasks and is scalable to meet the needs of growing enterprises, contributing to operational efficiency.

Possible disadvantages of Centrify Zero Trust Privilege

  • Complex Implementation
    Deploying a Zero Trust Privilege model can be complex and time-consuming, requiring significant changes to existing infrastructure and processes.
  • Cost
    The platform may involve substantial investment, especially for small businesses, due to licensing, maintenance, and potential need for specialized personnel.
  • Learning Curve
    Users and administrators might face a steep learning curve, needing proper training to effectively use and manage the solution.
  • Integration Challenges
    Integrating Centrify with existing systems and applications may pose difficulties, requiring careful planning and adjustments.

Analysis of Centrify Zero Trust Privilege

Overall verdict

  • Centrify Zero Trust Privilege is a robust and effective solution for organizations seeking advanced PAM capabilities. It is well-regarded for its ability to adapt to the evolving security landscape and its focus on reducing attack surfaces by enforcing least privilege access.

Why this product is good

  • Centrify Zero Trust Privilege is considered good due to its comprehensive approach to privileged access management (PAM). It offers a modern, cloud-ready solution that implements the Zero Trust model to secure critical infrastructure by verifying every user, device, and application before granting access. Additionally, it provides features such as multi-factor authentication, auditing, session monitoring, and machine identity protection, making it suitable for organizations looking to bolster their security posture against insider threats and external attacks.

Recommended for

  • Organizations of all sizes looking for a scalable PAM solution
  • Enterprises aiming to implement a Zero Trust security framework
  • Businesses with hybrid and multi-cloud environments
  • IT teams focused on strengthening identity and access management

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Okta Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication and Centrify Zero Trust Privilege)

Okta Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication

Centrify Zero Trust Privilege

Identity And Access Management
61 61%
Identity And Access Management
39% 39
Two Factor Authentication
100 100%
Two Factor Authentication
0% 0
Identity Provider
35 35%
Identity Provider
65% 65
Security & Privacy
100 100%
Security & Privacy
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Okta Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication and Centrify Zero Trust Privilege. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Okta Adaptive Multi-Factor Authentication and Centrify Zero Trust Privilege, you can also consider the following products

Duo Security - Duo Security provides cloud-based two-factor authentication. Duo’s technology can be deployed to protect users, data, and applications from breaches, credential theft, and account takeover.

DIGIPASS - DIGIPASS offers two-factor​ authentication solutions for mobile applications.

Ping Identity - Ping Identity provides cloud-based, single sign-on and identity management solutions with their SAML SSO.

Google Authenticator - Google Authenticator is a multifactor app for mobile devices.

Microsoft Azure Active Directory - Azure Active Directory is a comprehensive identity and access management cloud solution that provides a robust set of capabilities to manage users and groups and help secure access to applications including Microsoft online services like Office 365 …

Microsoft Authenticator - One app to quickly and securely verify your identity online, for all of your accounts.

Loading...