OctoSQL[0] or DuckDB[1] will most likely be much simpler, while going through 10 GB of JSON in a couple seconds at most. Disclaimer: author of OctoSQL [0]: https://github.com/cube2222/octosql. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

This is really cool! With their Postgres scanner[0] you can now easily query multiple datasources using SQL and join between them (i.e. Postgres table with JSON file). Something I strived to build with OctoSQL[1] before. It's amazing to see how quickly DuckDB is adding new features. Not a huge fan of C++, which is right now used for authoring extensions, it'd be really cool if somebody implemented a Rust extension... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Congrats on the Show HN! It's great to see more tools in this area (querying data from various sources in-place) and the Lambda use case is a really cool idea! I've recently done a bunch of benchmarking, including ClickHouse Local and the usage was straightforward, with everything working as it's supposed to. Just to comment on the performance area though, one area I think ClickHouse could still possibly improve... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

SPyQL is really cool and its design is very smart, with it being able to leverage normal Python functions! As far as similar tools go, I recommend taking a look at DataFusion[0], dsq[1], and OctoSQL[2]. DataFusion is a very (very very) fast command-line SQL engine but with limited support for data formats. Dsq is based on SQLite which means it has to load data into SQLite first, but then gives you the whole breath... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

To add somewhat of a counterpoint to the other response, I've tried the Steampipe CSV plugin and got 50x slower performance vs OctoSQL[0], which is itself 5x slower than something like DataFusion[1]. The CSV plugin doesn't contact any external API's so it should be a good benchmark of the plugin architecture, though it might just not be optimized yet. That said, I don't imagine this ever being a bottleneck for the... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

Maybe https://gobuffalo.io/en/ is the closest one, 🤔. Source: over 2 years ago

There's nothing like Django for Go, I believe the closest would be Buffalo, typically when building backends in Go you pick and choose a combination of standard library packages and third party packages to build your services. Source: over 2 years ago

These seem to be a way to embed all files to one executeable binary. Similar for Windows is https://github.com/sudachen/Molebox Others: - C/C++ has linker to link all to one binary - CLI/webserver only https://github.com/jart/cosmopolitan like https://redbean.dev . Same exe works on many x64 OS like Windows/macOS/Linux/BSD, it embeds .zip file and can read/write to embedded .zip on the fly. - AppImage... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

If you want to build a website with Go, first of you don't need nginx or caddy. Go's standard library web server is fantastic. One thing I find with Go is that because it's powerful enough to build a great web server, memory cache, or database, you can solve problems at a lower level. This is something I personally find really fun. If you want a full-on web formwork experience checkout https://gobuffalo.io/en/.... Source: over 2 years ago

It's early days but so far I've quite enjoyed my experience with Buffalo (Golang) framework [1], which mostly copies from Rails. Get Go performance and static typing. Definitely some rough patches, but overall still quite an enjoyable experience (so far). [1] https://gobuffalo.io/en/. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago