Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Observable Notebooks VS nteract

Compare Observable Notebooks VS nteract and see what are their differences

Observable Notebooks logo Observable Notebooks

The portfolio and technical blog of Chris Henrick – provider of professional web development, data visualization, GIS, mapping, & cartography services.

nteract logo nteract

nteract is a desktop application that allows you to develop rich documents that contain prose...
  • Observable Notebooks Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-06-14
  • nteract Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-29

Observable Notebooks features and specs

  • Interactivity
    Observable Notebooks offer built-in interactivity, allowing users to manipulate data and visualizations directly within the notebook.
  • Real-time Collaboration
    Multiple users can edit and interact with the same notebook simultaneously, similar to Google Docs, enhancing collaborative workflows.
  • Dynamic Imports
    Observable notebooks allow importing of JavaScript libraries and modules dynamically, making it easy to incorporate external tools and APIs.
  • Reactive Data Flow
    Observable employs a reactive programming model where cells automatically update when the data they depend on changes.
  • Integrated Visualization
    Provides seamless integration with D3.js and other visualization libraries for creating complex, data-driven visuals.

Possible disadvantages of Observable Notebooks

  • Learning Curve
    Users need to understand the reactive programming model and Observable’s unique syntax, which can be a barrier for beginners.
  • Limited Language Support
    Observable Notebooks primarily use JavaScript, limiting users who prefer or require other programming languages for data analysis.
  • Performance Issues
    Highly interactive or computationally heavy notebooks can experience performance slowdowns, particularly on less powerful machines.
  • Online Only
    Observable Notebooks require an internet connection as they work primarily in the browser, posing challenges for offline work scenarios.
  • Integration Limitations
    Observable’s unique environment may present integration challenges with other tools and workflows that aren't web-based.

nteract features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    nteract offers a user-friendly interface that is simple to set up and use, making it accessible to both beginners and experienced users in data science environments.
  • Interactivity
    The tool provides an interactive experience for running live code, displaying text, and visualizing data efficiently within a single notebook interface.
  • Multi-language Support
    nteract supports multiple programming languages, thanks to Jupyter kernels, which allows flexibility and integration within various data science workflows.
  • Open Source
    Being open source, nteract encourages community contributions and improvements, offering a level of transparency and customization to its users.
  • Extensibility
    The presence of numerous plugins and extensions enables users to enhance the functionality of nteract based on their specific requirements.

Possible disadvantages of nteract

  • Dependency Management
    Managing dependencies can be complex, as users need to handle different libraries and packages to ensure compatibility within their projects.
  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to other IDEs, nteract may lack some advanced features required by professional developers for large, intricate projects.
  • Performance Issues
    nteract may experience performance issues when managing large datasets or complex computations due to the resource-intensive nature of notebooks.
  • Learning Curve for Extensions
    While extensibility is a pro, understanding and integrating numerous plugins and extensions can present a learning curve for new users.
  • Community and Documentation
    Although growing, the nteract community and available documentation might not be as extensive as more established platforms like Jupyter Notebook.

Observable Notebooks videos

Observable Notebooks and D3.Js with Amelia Wattenberger and Vlad Korobov

nteract videos

nteract weekly August 16, 2018

More videos:

  • Review - nteract weekly November 5, 2018
  • Review - nteract weekly October 1, 2018

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Observable Notebooks and nteract)
Data Science Notebooks
47 47%
53% 53
Data Science And Machine Learning
Python IDE
59 59%
41% 41
Software Development
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Observable Notebooks and nteract. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Observable Notebooks and nteract

Observable Notebooks Reviews

We have no reviews of Observable Notebooks yet.
Be the first one to post

nteract Reviews

Jupyter Notebook & 10 Alternatives: Data Notebook Review [2023]
Once you install nteract, you can open your notebook without having to launch the Jupyter Notebook or visit the Jupyter Lab. The nteract environment is similar to Jupyter Notebook but with more control and the possibility of extension via libraries like Papermill (notebook parameterization), Scrapbook (saving your notebook’s data and photos), and Bookstore (versioning).
Source: lakefs.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, nteract seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Observable Notebooks mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Observable Notebooks yet. Tracking of Observable Notebooks recommendations started around Jun 2021.

nteract mentions (4)

  • Best Python IDEs for Data Science!
    At the same time that already established and widely used IDEs like RStudio are renewed and provide support for new languages, other solutions appear almost out of nowhere and are adopted by the market as is the case of nteract, an open-source project to be the next interactive development experience adopted by Netflix, in practice it has support for Python, node.JS, R, Julia, C ++, Scala and .NET, in addition to... - Source: dev.to / over 3 years ago
  • Python IDE similar to Jupyter Notebook but not web based?
    Sounds like you're looking for nteract. Source: about 4 years ago
  • Installing Jupyter Notebook
    If you reach infuriation levels you can always cop out and use https://nteract.io/ Ultimately I would suggest jupyterlab over jupyter. Source: about 4 years ago
  • How to open .ipynb files with Jupyter Notebook by double-clicking from windows explorer?
    You can also try the software nteract (https://nteract.io). Source: about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Observable Notebooks and nteract, you can also consider the following products

Jupyter - Project Jupyter exists to develop open-source software, open-standards, and services for interactive computing across dozens of programming languages. Ready to get started? Try it in your browser Install the Notebook.

BeakerX - Open Source Polyglot Data Science Tool

iPython - iPython provides a rich toolkit to help you make the most out of using Python interactively.

Kajero - Interactive JavaScript notebooks - create good-looking, responsive, interactive documents.

Polynote - The polyglot notebook with first-class Scala support.

iodide - Interactive, notebook programming environment for the web.