Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

ObjectBox VS Apache Ignite

Compare ObjectBox VS Apache Ignite and see what are their differences

ObjectBox logo ObjectBox

ObjectBox empower edge computing with an edge device database and synchronization solution for Mobile & IoT. Store and sync data from edge to cloud.

Apache Ignite logo Apache Ignite

high-performance, integrated and distributed in-memory platform for computing and transacting on...
  • ObjectBox Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-06

ObjectBox is a super fast database and sychronization solution, built uniquely for Mobile and IoT devices. ObjectBox is uniquely designed for small devices, so it is the ideal solution across hardware from Mobile Apps, to IoT Devices and IoT Gateways. It is the first high-performance NoSQL, ACID-compliant on-device edge database. Plus, it's built with developers in mind, with easy to use code that takes minimal time to implement.

ObjectBox supports Java, C/C++, Go, Kotlin, Swift and Python. Running on Android, Mac/iOS, Windows, Linux, Raspbian & more.

  • Apache Ignite Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-08

ObjectBox features and specs

  • Performance
    ObjectBox is known for its high performance in terms of speed. It provides fast data access and efficient data storage, which can be crucial for mobile applications and IoT devices.
  • Ease of Use
    ObjectBox offers an intuitive API that simplifies database management. Developers can easily implement it without needing extensive database expertise.
  • Object-Oriented Approach
    ObjectBox allows developers to work with database objects directly, eliminating the need for ORMs and reducing boilerplate code.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    Supports multiple platforms including Android, iOS, Linux, and others, enabling seamless data management across different operating systems.
  • Automatic Updates
    ObjectBox provides automatic database schema migrations, making it easier to manage changes without manual intervention.
  • Size
    It has a small footprint, which is beneficial for mobile applications where space and resources are constrained.

Possible disadvantages of ObjectBox

  • Limited Complexity Handling
    While great for simpler use cases, ObjectBox may face challenges with complex queries and data structures compared to more traditional SQL-based databases.
  • Community and Support
    Being a relatively newer database solution, it has a smaller community compared to established databases like SQLite, potentially reducing the availability of community-driven support and resources.
  • Feature Set
    It might lack some advanced features found in other databases, such as customized SQL queries, which could be limiting for some applications.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Using ObjectBox ties you to its ecosystem, which might limit flexibility if you choose to switch databases in the future.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its ease of use, developers unfamiliar with NoSQL or object database paradigms might encounter a learning curve.

Apache Ignite features and specs

  • In-Memory Data Grid
    Apache Ignite provides a robust in-memory data grid that can drastically improve data access speeds by storing data in memory across distributed nodes.
  • Scalability
    The system is designed to scale horizontally, allowing users to add more nodes to handle increased loads, thereby ensuring high availability and performance.
  • Distributed Compute Capabilities
    Ignite supports parallel execution of tasks across cluster nodes, which is beneficial for complex computations and real-time processing.
  • Persistence
    Although primarily in-memory, Ignite offers a durable and transactional Persistence layer that ensures data can be persisted on disk, providing a hybrid in-memory and persistent storage solution.
  • SQL Queries
    Ignite offers support for ANSI-99 SQL, which allows users to execute complex SQL queries across distributed datasets easily.
  • Integration
    It integrates well with existing Hadoop and Spark setups, allowing users to enhance their existing data pipelines with Ignite’s capabilities.
  • Fault Tolerance
    Apache Ignite includes built-in mechanisms for recovery and ensures that data copies are maintained across nodes for resilience against node failures.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Ignite

  • Complexity
    Apache Ignite can be complex to set up and manage, especially when configuring a large, distributed system with multiple nodes.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running an in-memory data grid like Ignite requires significant memory resources, which can increase operational costs.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its comprehensive features and distributed nature, there is a steep learning curve associated with effectively utilizing Ignite.
  • Configuration Overhead
    There is substantial configuration overhead involved to optimize performance and ensure proper cluster management.
  • Community Support
    Although it has active development, the community support might not be as robust compared to other more mature solutions, possibly leading to challenges in finding solutions to niche issues.
  • YARN Dependence
    For those looking to integrate with Hadoop, Ignite's optimal performance is sometimes reliant on Hadoop YARN, which can introduce additional complexity.

ObjectBox videos

Getting Started with Objectbox for Android / Java

More videos:

  • Review - ObjectBox - Startup of Startupnight 2018

Apache Ignite videos

Best Practices for a Microservices Architecture on Apache Ignite

More videos:

  • Review - Apache Ignite + GridGain powering up banks and financial institutions with distributed systems

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ObjectBox and Apache Ignite)
Databases
57 57%
43% 43
NoSQL Databases
58 58%
42% 42
Development
100 100%
0% 0
Key-Value Database
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using ObjectBox and Apache Ignite. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ObjectBox should be more popular than Apache Ignite. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ObjectBox mentions (7)

  • Publishing to F-Droid
    When I first attempted to publish to F-Droid, I experienced several pipeline issues. After reading through the pipeline logs in GitLab, I realized that my application's database (ObjectBox) was not entirely FOSS compliant and was causing build failures. The following day was spent migrating my app to Room. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Looking for android java developer mentor
    I would focus on Kotlin instead of Java, there's really no point in sticking to Java at this point. And when it comes to databases, some local ones that are pretty easy to get into are Realm and ObjectBox, SQLite can definitely be a bit overwhelming at the beginning. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Want to build a simple database app....Where do I start
    Just to add to this, there's also Realm and ObjectBox as alternatives. Source: over 2 years ago
  • EdgeDB 2.0
    Adding ObjectBox [0] to the list. [0] https://objectbox.io/. - Source: Hacker News / almost 3 years ago
  • Embedded databases - What is an embedded database? and how to choose one
    While - strictly speaking - "database" refers to a systematic collection of data, "Database Management System'', or DBMS, refers to the piece of software that provides an efficient and versatile method of working with data(eg: ObjectBox). However, often the term "database" is also used loosely to refer to a DBMS, and you will find most DBMS only use the term database in their name and communication. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
View more

Apache Ignite mentions (3)

  • API Caching: Techniques for Better Performance
    Apache Ignite — Free and open-source, Apache Ignite is a horizontally scalable key-value cache store system with a robust multi-model database that powers APIs to compute distributed data. Ignite provides a security system that can authenticate users' credentials on the server. It can also be used for system workload acceleration, real-time data processing, analytics, and as a graph-centric programming model. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • Ask HN: P2P Databases?
    Ignite works as you describe: https://ignite.apache.org/ I wouldn't really recommend this approach, I would think more in terms of subscriptions and topics and less of a 'database'. - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
  • .NET and Apache Ignite: Testing Cache and SQL API features — Part I
    Last days, I started using Apache Ignite as a cache strategy for some applications. Apache Ignite is an open-source In-Memory Data Grid, distributed database, caching, and high-performance computing platform. Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ObjectBox and Apache Ignite, you can also consider the following products

Realm.io - Realm is a mobile platform and a replacement for SQLite & Core Data. Build offline-first, reactive mobile experiences using simple data sync.

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

Microsoft SQL Server Compact - Bring Microsoft SQL Server 2017 to the platform of your choice. Use SQL Server 2017 on Windows, Linux, and Docker containers.

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

CompactView - Viewer for Microsoft® SQL Server® CE database files (sdf)

memcached - High-performance, distributed memory object caching system