Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

OAuth VS IndieAuth

Compare OAuth VS IndieAuth and see what are their differences

OAuth logo OAuth

OAuth is an open standard for authorization. It allows users to share their private resources (e.g.

IndieAuth logo IndieAuth

IndieAuth is a way to use your own domain name to sign in to websites.
  • OAuth Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-19
  • IndieAuth Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-19

OAuth features and specs

  • Delegated Authorization
    OAuth allows users to grant applications limited access to their resources without sharing their credentials, enhancing security and user convenience.
  • Third-Party Integration
    Facilitates seamless integration with third-party services by allowing applications to access user data across different platforms securely.
  • Granular Access Control
    Supports fine-grained permissions, enabling users to specify exactly what resources an application can access and for how long.
  • Enhanced Security
    By allowing applications to access data without exposing user credentials, OAuth reduces the risk of password theft and other security breaches.
  • User Experience
    Improves user experience by allowing single sign-on and reducing the need for creating and remembering multiple usernames and passwords.

Possible disadvantages of OAuth

  • Complexity
    Implementing OAuth can be complex and resource-intensive, requiring careful handling of authorization codes, tokens, and various flows.
  • Security Risks
    If not implemented correctly, OAuth can introduce vulnerabilities such as token interception, token leakage, or insufficient token expiration time handling.
  • Evolving Standards
    OAuth standards and best practices evolve over time, which can require ongoing maintenance and updates to ensure that implementations remain secure and compliant.
  • User Consent Fatigue
    Frequent consent requests for different applications and permissions can lead to user fatigue, potentially causing users to ignore important security warnings.
  • Dependency on Third-Party Services
    Relying on OAuth providers for authentication can be challenging as service outages or changes to provider APIs might disrupt the dependent applications.

IndieAuth features and specs

  • Decentralization
    IndieAuth is built on open web standards, allowing users to maintain control over their identity. It doesn't rely on centralized identity providers, reducing dependence on major tech companies and avoiding their potential limitations or policies.
  • User Control
    Users authenticate by using their own domain, preserving their autonomy and ownership over their online identity. This personal control aligns with the principles of the IndieWeb movement, promoting self-hosted identity solutions.
  • Interoperability
    IndieAuth is compatible with existing OAuth 2.0 standards, enabling seamless integration with various applications and services while supporting new, decentralized protocols.
  • Simplicity
    It simplifies the authentication process for both users and developers by using straightforward standards and protocols, making the implementation relatively user-friendly and less complex.

Possible disadvantages of IndieAuth

  • Limited Adoption
    Despite its advantages, IndieAuth has not been widely adopted compared to major authentication providers, which can limit its utility and presence in mainstream applications.
  • Technical Complexity for End Users
    For users without technical expertise, setting up and managing an IndieAuth-enabled identity can be challenging, as it may require domain ownership and configuration knowledge.
  • Lack of Ecosystem Features
    Compared to large identity providers like Google or Facebook, IndieAuth does not offer an extensive network or additional services (e.g., user analytics, security features), which some developers might find limiting.
  • Security Reliance on User Setup
    The security of an IndieAuth identity is often dependent on the user's domain and server configuration, which can vary widely in quality and robustness, potentially introducing vulnerabilities.

OAuth videos

OAuth 2.0: An Overview

More videos:

  • Review - OAuth 2.0 and OpenID Connect (in plain English)
  • Review - Google OAuth Review

IndieAuth videos

OSB2014 - Aaron Parecki - OAuth, IndieAuth, and the Future of Authorization APIs

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to OAuth and IndieAuth)
Network & Admin
83 83%
17% 17
Identity And Access Management
Security & Privacy
73 73%
27% 27
Identity Provider
75 75%
25% 25

User comments

Share your experience with using OAuth and IndieAuth. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, OAuth seems to be a lot more popular than IndieAuth. While we know about 21 links to OAuth, we've tracked only 2 mentions of IndieAuth. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

OAuth mentions (21)

  • Implementing a token based authentication for rest API
    You want OAuth. You almost certainly want to use Keycloak as your provider. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Skanderbeg Steam Login
    It's the same as when you get "log in with Google" or "Log in with Facebook" buttons on other sites. You can read about OpenAuth here: https://oauth.net/. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Password isn't dying
    Failure to adhere strictly to battle-tested standards like OAuth or OpenID Connect (OIDC). - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Securing BudPay Transactions: Encryption and Authentication Techniques
    In addition to user authentication, BudPay secures its API endpoints using authentication mechanisms such as API keys and OAuth (Open Authorization). These mechanisms ensure that only authorized applications and services can access BudPay's APIs, protecting user data from unauthorized access. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • How do you create a DB that stores info about which people have which access?
    You'll typically need a way for users to authenticate to the service – probably using OAuth if you want them to login with their accounts from an identity provider, such as Google or Facebook. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

IndieAuth mentions (2)

  • Democratizing social media, with the freedom of moving around platforms freely
    IndieAuth[1] is a slick DNS-based approach. Maybe offering that as a service would be a nice alternative. I point my DNS to you, and you handle authentication for everything that uses IndieAuth. If you go away or I don't like what you're doing then I can point my DNS to someone else offering that service and I retain the same DNS identity, and ability to use it to login anywhere I've set it up as my identity.... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Show HN: Login with HN (Unofficially)
    This is interesting but doing it the other way around - HN using something like IndieAuth[0] to verify user account identities without holding PII on the site itself - might be even more useful. [0]https://indieauth.com/. - Source: Hacker News / over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing OAuth and IndieAuth, you can also consider the following products

OpenID - OpenID is a safe, faster and easier way to log in to web sites.

Auth0 - Auth0 is a program for people to get authentication and authorization services for their own business use.

Portier - An email-based, passwordless authentication service that you can host yourself.

ASP.NET SAML - ASP.NET SAML is an open-source authentication utility that has been used for exchanging authentication and authorization data between the channels.

humanID - humanID is a one-click anonymous SSO that provides users with an anonymous identity layer.

DotNetOpenAuth - DotNetOpenAuth is a free-to-use compiled library that comes with the real support to your site visitor to login with the help of openIDs via getting control of the ASP.NET control onto the page.