Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

oauth.io VS Keycloak

Compare oauth.io VS Keycloak and see what are their differences

oauth.io logo oauth.io

OAuth that just works. Integrate 100+ OAuth providers in minutes.

Keycloak logo Keycloak

Open Source Identity and Access Management for modern Applications and Services.
  • oauth.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-11
  • Keycloak Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-20

oauth.io features and specs

  • Ease of Integration
    OAuth.io offers a simplified process for integrating OAuth authentication into applications, reducing the complexity of handling authentication flows manually.
  • Unified Interface
    Provides a consistent interface for developers to interact with various OAuth providers, which can save development time and effort.
  • Security Features
    Includes built-in security features such as CSRF protection, making the implementation of OAuth more secure.
  • Supports Multiple Providers
    Allows integration with a wide range of OAuth providers, offering flexibility in choosing which services to authenticate with.
  • Time-saving
    Speeds up the development process by handling the intricacies of OAuth flows, allowing developers to focus on core functionalities.

Possible disadvantages of oauth.io

  • Dependency on Third Party
    Relying on a third-party service for authentication can be risky, as any downtime or change in service can affect your application.
  • Cost Concerns
    Depending on the pricing model, using OAuth.io might incur additional costs, especially for applications with a large number of users.
  • Less Control
    Delegating OAuth management to OAuth.io may result in less control over the authentication process compared to custom implementations.
  • Limited Customization
    While OAuth.io simplifies OAuth integration, it may also limit the ability to customize specific aspects of authentication flows.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Using a specific third-party service could lead to vendor lock-in, making it challenging to switch providers if needed in the future.

Keycloak features and specs

  • Open-Source
    Keycloak is an open-source identity and access management solution, which means it is free to use and has a community-driven support system. This can lead to lower costs and more flexibility compared to proprietary solutions.
  • Feature-Rich
    Keycloak offers a comprehensive set of features including single sign-on (SSO), multi-factor authentication (MFA), user federation, identity brokering, and social login. This makes it suitable for a wide range of use cases.
  • Customizability
    With Keycloak, you can customize the authentication and authorization processes through its extensible architecture, allowing for the addition of custom features and integrations.
  • Integration Capability
    Keycloak supports integration with various protocols such as OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, and SAML, making it versatile for integrating with different platforms and services.
  • Active Community
    Keycloak has an active and growing community of developers and users who contribute to its improvement and provide support, resources, and shared knowledge.

Possible disadvantages of Keycloak

  • Complexity
    Keycloak can be complex to set up and configure, especially for users who are not familiar with identity and access management concepts. This may require additional time and expertise.
  • Resource-Intensive
    Running Keycloak can be resource-intensive, requiring more CPU and memory compared to simpler authentication solutions. This may necessitate higher infrastructure costs.
  • Learning Curve
    The learning curve for Keycloak can be steep for new users due to its wide range of features and configuration options. Ample time might be required to fully understand and utilize its capabilities.
  • Documentation Quality
    While Keycloak has extensive documentation, some users find it to be insufficiently detailed or difficult to navigate, which can impede the setup and troubleshooting process.
  • Maintenance
    Operating a Keycloak instance involves ongoing maintenance tasks such as updates, security patches, and backups, which can be time-consuming and require dedicated resources.

oauth.io videos

No oauth.io videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Keycloak videos

What is Keycloak and what are the main features | DevNation Live

More videos:

  • Review - Keycloak Overview
  • Review - Easily Secure Your Front and Back End app with Keycloak

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to oauth.io and Keycloak)
Identity And Access Management
Identity Provider
13 13%
87% 87
Development
100 100%
0% 0
SSO
7 7%
93% 93

User comments

Share your experience with using oauth.io and Keycloak. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare oauth.io and Keycloak

oauth.io Reviews

We have no reviews of oauth.io yet.
Be the first one to post

Keycloak Reviews

12 User Authentication Platforms [Auth0, Firebase Alternatives]
You can integrate Keycloak with your applications to have a single-sign-in and single-sign-out experience. Moreover, one can activate social logins without any modification in code. Additionally, it allows user authentication via existing OpenID Connect or SAML 2.0
Source: geekflare.com
10+ Open-source Single-Sign On (SSO) Solutions
Keycloak is a free, open-source identity and access management system with highly configurable Single-Sign-On (SSO) support.
Source: medevel.com
10 Best Auth0 Alternatives and Similar Platforms
Keycloak may be quite beneficial because it provides a built-in method for syncing with databases, such as LDAP or Active Directory, when your users already are registered on. If you use Social Login for social platforms such as Facebook, Keycloak might be a great tool for your organization.
Top 5 Open Source Single Sign-On Software In the Year 2021
KeyCloak is another free software that is based on OpenID Connect, OAuth2.0, and SAML2.0. It provides SSO capabilities across web applications and web services. Above all, this open source software provides integrations with LDAP and Active Directory. There is a logical user interface where users can manage roles, permissions, and sessions. Moreover, this free solution...
IAM: A comparison of open-source tools
/ Digitalberry news / IAM: A comparison of open-source toolsIAM: A comparison of open-source toolsWhy use an Identity Provider (IdP)?Comparative study of Identity Providers (IdP)1. Our team’s first choice: Keycloak2. In second place of our comparative study: Gluu3. Special mention: FusionAuthDiscover our expertiseContact our experts

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Keycloak seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

oauth.io mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of oauth.io yet. Tracking of oauth.io recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Keycloak mentions (4)

  • Beyond the login page
    Most of the time nowadays, I prefer offloading this to an identity provider, using OpenID Connect or soon Federated Credential Management (FedCM), even if that means shipping an identity provider as part of the deliverables (I generally go with Keycloak, with keycloak-config-cli to provision its configuration). I'm obviously biased though as I work in IT services, developping software mainly for... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Okta Says Hackers Stole Data for All Customer Support Users
    Yet another breach of Okta... Why are companies not running something like keycloak [1] themselves? Are administrative/maintenance costs too high or is it plausible deniability? [1] https://keycloak.org. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • I built a ready-to-use auth server with TypeScript and Express.js
    I'd stick with a solution like https://keycloak.org in that instance. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Authelia is an open-source authentication/authorization server with 2FA/SSO
    A few more projects in this space: - Keycloak (you won't get fired for picking this)[0] - CloudFoundry's UAA[1] - Gluu [2] - Keratin [3] - OpenUnison [4] - Dex[5] - Netlify's GoTrue[6] All of these solutions are a bit different but here are some of the axes: - Whether or not they function as an OAuth provider - Whether they're centered around application-user-login (email + password) or application auth (OAuth) or... - Source: Hacker News / about 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing oauth.io and Keycloak, you can also consider the following products

Auth0 - Auth0 is a program for people to get authentication and authorization services for their own business use.

Spring Security - The Spring portfolio has many projects, including Spring Framework, Spring IO Platform, Spring Cloud, Spring Boot, Spring Data, Spring Security...

Okta - Enterprise-grade identity management for all your apps, users & devices

JSON Web Token - JSON Web Tokens are an open, industry standard RFC 7519 method for representing claims securely between two parties.

OneLogin - On-demand SSO, directory integration, user provisioning and more

Firebase Authentication - Application and Data, Application Utilities, and User Management and Authentication