Nova Code Editor Reviews

Kialo Reviews

Nova Code Editor mentions (39)

• Ask HN: Other than VS Code, are there any good IDEs for remote development?

  There there use to be a stronger distinction between Text Editors and IDE’s. Of course there is a wide spectrum from something like ‘nano’ to Microsoft’s Visual Studio (not VScode) On macOS, BBEdit has had SFTP since the late 1990s. BBEdit is probably closer to the Text Editor than IDE when compared to VSCode https://www.barebones.com/products/bbedit/ Also on macOS, Panic’s recent Nova editor includes SFTP. Nova... - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago

• Bare Bones Software – BBEdit 15 is here

  Nova (https://nova.app) It's so close to being great. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

• Tell HN: My Favorite Tools

  A few apps that are a joy to use: https://ia.net/writer for writing. https://usecontrast.com/ for checking contrast. https://sipapp.io/ for picking colors. https://nova.app/ for editing code. https://cleanshot.com/ for screenshots. https://getpixelsnap.com/ for measuring elements on screen. https://netnewswire.com/ for reading things via RSS. https://panic.com/transmit/ for file transfers. https://usefathom.com/... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

• A collection of useful Mac Apps

  Nova - Price: $99 (one-time purchase) Code editor for macOS that features a sleek UI, powerful features, and great performance. Source: 11 months ago

• How VSCode made bracket pair colorization 10,000x faster

  > Meanwhile, everyone is absolutely free to create a native VSCode clone. But that isn't happening at least for now. I think Nova[1] is generally angling for that spot on Mac. I really wanted to embrace it, and someday if I have a bunch of free time to indulge my curiosity I may well do. But… > Everyone hates VSCode, but nobody ever has managed to offer a competing alternative. This, plus even trying a new editor... - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

Kialo mentions (5)

• Looking for rational debates, books, and papers from climate change DENIERS

  Don't listen to them. What you are doing is very anti-polarisation. In a polarised society, you will have a lot of disbelievers in you. Don't listen to them. To make any convincing argument, you have to put it through the scrutiny of multiple arguments in all sides. Climate deniers are not climate deniers because they run away from truth, they are because they think they found THE truth. If their arguments can be... Source: over 1 year ago

• Because ads to tell kids that myocarditis is normal have always been around

  Kialo.com is better for real debate. There you could cite your study, and people could discuss why it does-or-doesn't apply to this-or-that population, and any name-calling, or maligning someone's attitude, would be deleted with explanation and invitation to rephrase. Source: over 1 year ago

• Some people here needs to learn how to have a debate, i criticized the inclusion of the Undersiders and how it was handled in Ward and got nuked (Destroyed) and i will stand my ground goddammit

  Should check out https://kialo.com . Best site for forming a healthy debate. Source: almost 2 years ago

• Where to find people willing to help with giant argument mapping discussion to test religious claims?

  I read it and it looks like they studied r/TheRedPill, r/DatingAdvice, r/Atheism, and r/TheDonald, but I don't see where it suggests the results might apply to subreddits such as r/religion or other discussion platforms such as kialo.com. Also, they only seem to have found a small bias in the more neutral subreddit r/DatingAdvice. Source: almost 3 years ago

• Looking for volunteers to test the "Yes/no debate" strategy

  And about your second suggesting: Yes, I also had something like in mind – and in fact, there is kialo.com already doing it! Source: about 3 years ago