NoScript VS User-Agent Switcher and Manager

Https://noscript.net/ The extension that turns off all JavaScript & Media links on the page. - Source: dev.to / 8 days ago

You should check out https://noscript.net/. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago

Good or bad depends on the intentions of the website you're visiting, and unfortunately also of the many 3rd party script sources it includes. Users should have a chance to decide which sites they trust to run JavaScript and which they do not, and this is the reason why 18 years ago I've created NoScript, and why it is still there and shipped by default inside the Tor Browser. Source: 6 months ago

Use a different name, password, and email if you can. Keep an adblocker and noscript handy. Don't accept cookies from new sites. Maybe even use the TOR browser for better anonymity and safety while you're giving these new platforms a test run. Source: 11 months ago

I do (with the NoScript browser extension: https://noscript.net/). The main reason is to reduce my attack surface. A secondary benefit is it eliminates most ads and other annoying distractions. - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago

What I do is install the User-Agent Switcher and Manager extension and set the user-agent to ${userAgent}. Source: almost 2 years ago

User-Agent Switcher and Manager, site - im fairly certain this does some of what privacy possum does, though this has better controls and options for this one specific feature. Source: almost 2 years ago

Yes, this is paywalled. And I seriously doubt many Canadians subscribe to the Detroit Free Press. Change your browser user-agent (via browser addon or different browser entirely) to the following to read this article:. Source: almost 3 years ago