Node OS VS Lightspark

Does "whatever" include whole freaking operating systems? Source: over 1 year ago

Can I introduce you to Node-OS? Https://node-os.com/. Source: over 1 year ago

Look, if this is a thing, I'm sure we can also make a java one. Source: over 1 year ago

Maybe not the kernel since JS needs a runtime at least, but there is https://node-os.com/ based on the linux kernel. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

It exists, unfortunately: https://node-os.com/. Source: over 1 year ago

Not the first attempted Flash reimplementation[1,2,3]. The GNU one didn’t work all that well back in the day as far as I remember, but then Flash was a moving target at the time. [1]: https://www.gnu.org/software/gnash/ [2]: http://lightspark.github.io/ [3]: https://github.com/mozilla/shumway. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

A true emulator would be something like Ruffle or Lightspark. Ruffle I know doesn't work well with Walfas last time I checked. I don't know about Lightspark. Source: almost 2 years ago

Lightspark, a browser plugin written in C++. It's a work in progress, not every flash content will work. Modern mainstream browsers don't support running it within a page, so flash content needs to be run in a standalone lightspark app, or in some lesser known browsers. Source: almost 2 years ago

I'm trying to install lightspark on my computer, and it hinges on launching a shell script that mainly executes a CMake command. When I try ./build.sh (the name of the shell script), I get a bunch of lines of errors. The first one I think is major is CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake-3.23/Modules/CMakeTestCCompiler.cmake:69 (message): The C compiler "/usr/bin/cc" is not able to compile a simple test... Source: almost 2 years ago

I'm having alot of fun with this post actually. I wouldn't be surprised if there was some alternative or workaround for whatever you guys need to run. For example, instead of the clunky Java, we have this. Instead of Flash, try this. Source: over 2 years ago