Software Alternatives & Reviews

Ninja Build VS autosetup

Compare Ninja Build VS autosetup and see what are their differences

Ninja Build logo Ninja Build

Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.

autosetup logo autosetup

autosetup is a tool, similar to autoconf, to configure a build system for the appropriate...
  • Ninja Build Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-14
  • autosetup Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-09-11

Ninja Build videos

FORTNITE STW: HERE IS THE BEST NINJA BUILD (AFTER MONTHS OF TESTING)

autosetup videos

No autosetup videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Ninja Build and autosetup)
Front End Package Manager
JavaScript Package Manager
JS Build Tools
89 89%
11% 11
Continuous Integration
79 79%
21% 21

User comments

Share your experience with using Ninja Build and autosetup. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Ninja Build seems to be a lot more popular than autosetup. While we know about 22 links to Ninja Build, we've tracked only 1 mention of autosetup. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Ninja Build mentions (22)

  • TypeScript's Successor is Waiting, and You'll Never Want to Turn Back
    Under the hood, Rescript uses a build system called Ninja. Ninja is similar to Make, but cross-platform and more minimal/performant. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Using Make – writing less Makefile
    Ninja was super easy to pick up even after using make for some time (10+ years). GN is just a ninja generator that is optional. https://gn.googlesource.com/gn/+/main/docs/quick_start.md https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • Ask HN: What outdated tech are you still using and are perfectly happy with?
    Really? I thought most new projects were switching to ninja[^1] and have never used it. [^1]: https://ninja-build.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
  • What was used to build C++ programs before Cmake?
    Ninja showed real promise for a while, but then CMake grew up and people stopped seeing a reason to leave it behind. Source: 10 months ago
  • Building and Running Pidgin and Finch 3
    Now that you have your build system all generated you can go ahead and build everything. By default Meson will use Ninja as the build tool. Ninja is similar to Make but much much faster. You can also generate additional build systems but that's outside of the scope of this post. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

autosetup mentions (1)

  • Guide: Hush Shell-Scripting Language
    You might love autosetup, a Tcl-based autoconf tool chain replacement. Not just Tcl-based, but designed to work with a simple Tcl subset shell called Jim, which compiles from one source code file. So you can bootstrap your project in a mostly-platform-independent with a standard C compiler as the only prerequisite. https://msteveb.github.io/autosetup/. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Ninja Build and autosetup, you can also consider the following products

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Meson - Meson is an open source build system meant to be both extremely fast, and, even more importantly...

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

the xonsh shell - Xonsh is a Python-powered, cross-platform, Unix-gazing shell language and command prompt.

tup - Tup is a file-based build system for Linux, OSX, and Windows.

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.