NimbleText VS Firefox Relay

It's not a game-changer for me. I like to have it, but I'm also still using tools like NimbleText and thinking about source generators for a lot of stuff. Source: 11 months ago

Writing a program to generate some tedious C# is actually a fine endeavor. I've done it plenty of times! You should also have a look at NimbleText. Then you don't even have to write 80% of the script! Source: 12 months ago

That gets really, really old really, really fast. Every control you write probably has 2-5 of these, and in extreme cases a control might have more than a dozen. I already use the templating tool NimbleText to help with this. It'd be a lot nicer if I could just write a prompt like:. Source: about 1 year ago

That said, if you don't feel like waiting around to see if I actually do the example (I don't always keep these promises), for stuff like this there's a tool called NimbleText I've been using to generate the class for me. There's a free online version that will do the trick and it doesn't take too long to figure out. The main "downside" compared to source generation is you have to copy/paste it yourself. Source: about 1 year ago

NimbleText lets me write a template for one instance of that code, then I can fill in data lines and let it generate the rest. It's kind of like a source generator, only at write-time, not compile-time. It's done more work to make dependency properties palatable than Microsoft ever has. Source: about 1 year ago

Other services like this one: addy.io or relay.firefox.com (no pgp, as I remember). - Source: dev.to / 5 days ago

Firefox Relay is a handy assistant to at least stymie email tracking and is neatly integrated with the browser. The free tier gets you a few masked emails that forward to your actual inbox. You can't reply through the masked email without paying, but that might not be necessary for all. It feels like retaining some semblance of privacy is a losing battle. Data clean rooms are industry standard now and many... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

That isn't alarmist, but almost all privacy features in Brave are already in Firefox as well. Looking at this page: - Chromium customizations: Not necessary in Firefox - Client-side encryption for Brave Sync: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/how-firefox-sync-keeps-your-data-safe-even-if-tls-fails - DeAMPing: I think AMP has been dead for a few years now - Limiting network server calls: I think this is a bit... - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

> In a sense, it sounds like the advice of the services is less subscribing to them than trying not to have a few e-mails that map to your personal identity. Firefox Relay is a great way to do that :) https://relay.firefox.com Integrating that with Monitor is pretty high on at least my personal wish list. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

> In what ways has mozilla meaningfully dared to try and expand their revenue streams? I think that Mozilla VPN is pretty nice. It's based on Mullvad VPN, so they seem to know their audience (given that Mullvad has a pretty okay reputation among many tech savvy or privacy conscious folks, a lot of which probably use something like Firefox as well): https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/products/vpn/ I guess there's also... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago