Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

NextUX Visual Editor VS Cypress.io

Compare NextUX Visual Editor VS Cypress.io and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

NextUX Visual Editor logo NextUX Visual Editor

Easy-to-use iteration app for non-designers

Cypress.io logo Cypress.io

Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.
  • NextUX Visual Editor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-30
  • Cypress.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-17

NextUX Visual Editor features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    NextUX Visual Editor offers an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible to both design novices and professionals.
  • Design Flexibility
    The editor provides a wide range of design options and customization features, allowing users to tailor their designs according to specific needs.
  • Real-time Collaboration
    Users can collaborate in real-time with team members, enhancing productivity and fostering more creative teamwork.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    NextUX is compatible with multiple platforms, allowing for seamless integration with existing tools and workflows.

Possible disadvantages of NextUX Visual Editor

  • Learning Curve
    While user-friendly, some advanced features may require a steep learning curve for new users who are not familiar with design tools.
  • Limited Export Options
    The platform may have limited format options for exporting projects, which can constrain how designs are used or shared.
  • Subscription Cost
    NextUX Visual Editor is not free, and the cost of subscription might be a concern for freelancers or small businesses with tight budgets.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users might experience performance slowdowns, especially when handling complex projects within the editor.

Cypress.io features and specs

  • Easy Setup and Configuration
    Cypress.io is known for its straightforward setup process, requiring minimal configuration to get started with writing and running tests, making it very accessible for developers new to end-to-end testing.
  • Real-time Reloads
    Cypress offers real-time reloading of tests, which improves the development experience by allowing instant feedback on test results as code changes are made.
  • Time Travel Debugging
    Cypress provides the ability to 'time travel' through tests by taking snapshots of the application state at different steps, making it easier to debug and understand failures.
  • Automatic Waiting
    Tests in Cypress automatically wait for commands and assertions, eliminating the need for manual waits and helping to avoid flaky tests due to timing issues.
  • Built-in Mocking and Stubbing
    Cypress has built-in capabilities for mocking and stubbing network requests, which simplifies testing of applications that depend on various services and APIs.
  • Rich Documentation and Community Support
    Cypress boasts comprehensive documentation and an active community, providing plenty of resources for learning and troubleshooting.
  • Cross Browser Testing
    Cypress supports testing in multiple browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, and Edge, ensuring compatibility across different environments.

Possible disadvantages of Cypress.io

  • Limited Browser Support
    Although Cypress supports several major browsers, it does not support legacy browsers like Internet Explorer, which can be a disadvantage for projects that require testing across a wider range of browsers.
  • No Native Mobile App Testing
    Cypress does not natively support mobile app testing, limiting its use for projects that need end-to-end testing on mobile platforms.
  • Heavy Memory Usage
    Cypress can consume significant system resources, particularly memory, which may impact performance during large or complex test runs.
  • Limited Parallelism
    By default, Cypress's parallel execution capabilities are limited, which can slow down the test suite execution for larger projects, although this can be mitigated with the Dashboard Service (a paid feature).
  • Learning Curve for Advanced Features
    While basic tests are easy to set up, leveraging advanced features like custom commands, plugins, and complex test setups can require a steeper learning curve.
  • Incompatibility with Some Testing Ecosystems
    Cypress's architecture and testing approach can sometimes cause compatibility issues with certain testing frameworks and libraries, particularly those that are tightly coupled with traditional WebDriver-based tools.

NextUX Visual Editor videos

No NextUX Visual Editor videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Cypress.io videos

Introduction to automation testing with Cypress.io (Non-selenium framework)

More videos:

  • Review - Testing Angular with Cypress.io | Joe Eames | AngularConnect 2018

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to NextUX Visual Editor and Cypress.io)
Web App
100 100%
0% 0
Automated Testing
0 0%
100% 100
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using NextUX Visual Editor and Cypress.io. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare NextUX Visual Editor and Cypress.io

NextUX Visual Editor Reviews

We have no reviews of NextUX Visual Editor yet.
Be the first one to post

Cypress.io Reviews

20 Best JavaScript Frameworks For 2023
Cypress is a holistic automation testing framework where the tester can perform unit, integration, end-to-end, and regression testing. Additionally, they may orchestrate and unify outcomes with quality measurements and useful insights that support the agile workplace by leveraging the Cypress cloud.
Top 10 Perfecto alternatives with Zebrunner on top
- is a SaaS web app for easy scaling test runs and debugging failed tests. Pairs with the open source Cypress Test Runner.
Source: zebrunner.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Cypress.io seems to be a lot more popular than NextUX Visual Editor. While we know about 27 links to Cypress.io, we've tracked only 1 mention of NextUX Visual Editor. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

NextUX Visual Editor mentions (1)

  • Working with Jira
    I keep things simple by just using NextUX. It's like a simplified version of Figma that's focused more on rapid iteration and collaberation with the whole team. Source: about 4 years ago

Cypress.io mentions (27)

  • Ensuring Web Accessibility with Cypress: A Comprehensive Guide
    Feature: Web Accessibility Tests Feature: Web Accessibility Tests Scenario Outline: Verify all WCAG Violations Given I am on the "" page And Verify all Accessibility Violations Scenario Outline: Verify P1,P2 WCAG Violations Given I am on the "" page And Verify only P1, P2 issues Examples: | url | | https://google.com | | https://amazon.in | | https://agoda.com | |... - Source: dev.to / 9 months ago
  • Simulating Internet Outage and Recovery using Cypress
    In this blog post, we'll explore a Cypress test that replicates this scenario, utilizing the powerful intercept command to manipulate network requests and responses. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Scraping a site?
    Maybe something like Cypress is what you're looking for? Cypress.io. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • How to write tests in Django for JavaScript fetch
    You won't be able to test the javascript function itself from within python, but you can exercise the front-end code using something like cypress (https://cypress.io) or the older but still respectable selenium (https://selenium.dev). Source: about 2 years ago
  • What's your CI/CD flow made of?
    How are they run (services (ie. GitHub Action Runners, SauceLabs, Cypress.io, etc.), or self hosted autoscaling infrastructures)? Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing NextUX Visual Editor and Cypress.io, you can also consider the following products

CSS Grab n' Go Editor - Visual editor for learning and quick CSS mocking

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Dico - Hardcoded strings into editable content

Katalon - Built on the top of Selenium and Appium, Katalon Studio is a free and powerful automated testing tool for web testing, mobile testing, and API testing.

LambdaTest - Perform Web Testing on 2000+ Browsers & OS

puppeteer - Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome or Chromium...