Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Netmaker VS frp

Compare Netmaker VS frp and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

Netmaker logo Netmaker

Netmaker automates mesh VPN's and software-defined networks using WireGuard.

frp logo frp

A fast reverse proxy to help you expose a local server behind a NAT or firewall to the internet.
  • Netmaker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-12

  • frp Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-24

Netmaker features and specs

  • Scalability
    Netmaker is designed to easily scale with growing network demands, making it suitable for both small businesses and large enterprises.
  • Performance
    The platform optimizes for speed and low-latency connections, which enhances overall network efficiency and user experience.
  • Security
    Netmaker provides robust security features, including encryption and controlled access, which help protect network data and reduce vulnerabilities.
  • Automation
    Automated network management features simplify the process of setting up and maintaining virtual networks, reducing manual work and potential errors.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Netmaker supports a wide range of operating systems, allowing seamless integration across diverse device landscapes.

Possible disadvantages of Netmaker

  • Complexity
    Initial setup and configuration can be complex, requiring a certain level of technical knowledge, which might be challenging for non-technical users.
  • Cost
    While offering a free tier, the advanced features and enterprise-level services come at a cost that might not fit within all organizations' budgets.
  • Limited Support
    As of now, support options may be limited, which could be a drawback for users who require extensive customer service or immediate assistance.
  • Learning Curve
    Due to its comprehensive features and capabilities, new users might experience a steep learning curve when adapting to the platform.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running the software might be resource-intensive on certain systems, potentially requiring upgrades or additional hardware investment.

frp features and specs

  • Versatile Tunneling
    FRP supports a variety of tunneling protocols, including HTTP, TCP, and UDP, making it suitable for a wide range of applications and use cases.
  • Cross-Platform Support
    FRP is compatible with multiple operating systems, including Windows, Linux, and macOS, providing flexibility in deployment across different environments.
  • Configuration Simplicity
    The tool's configuration is straightforward, enabling quick setup and deployment, especially for users with basic networking knowledge.
  • High Performance
    FRP is designed to handle high-performance tunneling, with efficient resource usage, ensuring reliable connectivity even under load.
  • Active Community
    FRP has an active open-source community that provides extensions, support, and frequent updates, contributing to its development and reliability.

Possible disadvantages of frp

  • Complexity in Advanced Configurations
    While basic setup is simple, more advanced configurations and customizations can become complex and may require deeper networking knowledge.
  • Security Considerations
    As with any tunneling software, running FRP without proper security measures can expose sensitive data to potential risks, requiring careful configuration and firewall rules.
  • Lack of Official Support
    Being an open-source project, FRP does not have formal customer support, which can be challenging for organizations that require guaranteed assistance.
  • Resource Consumption
    Though efficient, FRP still consumes additional resources, which may be a concern for environments with limited computational capacity.
  • Network Restrictions
    FRP may face restrictions in environments with strict network policies, such as corporate or government networks, impacting its accessibility and usability.

Netmaker videos

免费开源的组网神器NetMaker,wireguard协议LAN to LAN对等网络

More videos:

  • Tutorial - Netmaker v0.2 - Site to Site and Gateway over WireGuard Tutorial
  • Review - Netmaker - A powerful, open source, self hosted, GUI for setting up Wireguard networks and VPNs.
  • Review - Automated Failover / Relay for WireGuard ® Networks with Netmaker EE

frp videos

DO NOT BUY - Roland FRP-1 Digital Piano Bundle With Bluetooth

More videos:

  • Review - Piano teacher tests and reviews a Roland FRP-1 digital piano bundle (Costco Exclusive)
  • Review - RIDER REVIEW! FRP Pocket Rocket from Amazon!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Netmaker and frp)
VPN
100 100%
0% 0
Localhost Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Infrastructure
100 100%
0% 0
Tunnel
0 0%
100% 100

Questions and Answers

As answered by people managing Netmaker and frp.

What makes your product unique?

Netmaker's answer

  1. Netmaker uses kernel WireGuard, which makes it way faster and more modern than the alternatives.
  2. Netmaker can also be fully "self-hosted" so you don't have to rely on a 3rd party with potential access to your sensitive data. 3 Netmaker creates a Mesh VPN, which is like the best of software-defined networking, zero trust, and VPNs all combined into one.

Why should a person choose your product over its competitors?

Netmaker's answer

Netmaker is faster, more configurable, cheaper, and can be fully-self hosted. With Netmaker, you're in control.

How would you describe your primary audience?

Netmaker's answer

IT admins, sysadmins, DevOps, InfraOps, platform engineers, and developers.

Which are the primary technologies used for building your product?

Netmaker's answer

WireGuard, Golang, and Docker.

User comments

Share your experience with using Netmaker and frp. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Netmaker and frp

Netmaker Reviews

We have no reviews of Netmaker yet.
Be the first one to post

frp Reviews

7 Ngrok Alternatives & Competitors for App Tunneling, Free & Paid
frp is a self-hosted reverse proxy server and client you can install from a simple binary executable compiled from Go, making it fast to load and run.
Source: onboardbase.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Netmaker should be more popular than frp. It has been mentiond 63 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Netmaker mentions (63)

  • PrivateVPN is horrible. Don't do it.
    With Netmaker, you can have greater control and customization by assigning dedicated IP addresses to specific nodes within your network. I just stumble upon it yesterday, check it out. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Benefit of connect device under NAT to VPN network
    These days, I'm trying to deploy full mesh VPN network with netmaker. It is really easy to use and manage. However there are something makes me confused. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Web based self service CA for OpenVPN
    If a TCP based protocol isn't an absolute must have, I'd ditch OpenVPN for Wireguard with some kind of management overlay. e.g netmaker. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Tailscale increased free plan user limit form 1 to 3 and device cap to 100 also... unlimited subnets
    Do the net maker https://github.com/gravitl/netmaker worth trying to use instead of Tailscale? Tailscale is good, but I can watch YouTube over Wi-Fi in another country, but when I try to use Jellyfin to watch movies it’s not loading well. Source: about 2 years ago
  • Tips & Tricks for Productivity with Android E-Ink Devices (Obsidian, Syncthing, Weylus, RustDesk, Termux, KDE Connect, ZeroTier)
    Very relatable! At first, I struggled for days trying to make Netmaker or Innernet functional for my personal home server (Raspberry Pi behind multiple routers). But then I stumbled upon ZeroTier, and everything worked seamlessly within a couple of hours. Tailscale was actually the next one on my list because I heard many positive things about it over at r/selfhosted (especially about headscale). However, I did... Source: about 2 years ago
View more

frp mentions (17)

  • Expose home server with Rathole tunnel and Traefik
    In the previous article, I wrote about a temporary SSH tunneling technique to bypass CGNAT. This method is not suitable for exposing permanent services, at least not without autossh manager. Proper tools for this are rapiz1/rathole or fatedier/frp. I chose Rathole since it's written in Rust and offers better performance and benchmarks. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Expose local dev server with SSH tunnel and Docker
    Another point to make is that the SSH tunnel technique is most suitable for temporarily exposing services for demo purposes. For permanent tunnels, you would need to add autossh to keep the connection alive, but there are better tools for permanent tunnels, such as rapiz1/rathole or fatedier/frp. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • 3 Best Ngrok Alternatives
    According to its Github page, FRP is "a fast reverse proxy that allows you to expose a local server located behind a NAT or firewall to the internet. It currently supports TCP and UDP, as well as HTTP and HTTPS protocols, enabling requests to be forwarded to internal services via domain name.". - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Show HN: Connet – A P2P reverse proxy with NAT traversal
    Over the past couple of months, I've been working on connet. At this point, it is working pretty smoothly (in what I use it for), so I wanted to share it with more people and see what they think. I know many other similar/reverse proxy solutions exist - like https://github.com/fatedier/frp, and a bunch more you can find at - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • List of ngrok/Cloudflare Tunnel alternatives and other tunneling software and services. Focus on self-hosting.
    If you want to self-host, there are many options. For something production ready frp is probably what you want. If you're a developer, I'd recommend starting with my own SirTunnel project and modifying it for your needs. For non-developers and those wanting more of a GUI experience, I created boringproxy. It's my take on a comprehensive tunnel proxy solution. It's in beta but currently solves almost everything I... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Netmaker and frp, you can also consider the following products

TailScale - Private networks made easy Connect all your devices using WireGuard, without the hassle. Tailscale makes it as easy as installing an app and signing in.

Rathole - A reverse proxy for NAT traversal written in Rust. An alternative to frp and ngrok.

ZeroTier - Extremely simple P2P Encrypted VPN

Pinggy.io - Public URLs for localhost without downloading any binary

Headscale - An open source, self-hosted implementation of the Tailscale control server

zrok - Next-generation sharing platform built on top of OpenZiti