Nethogs VS psutil

I'm not sure how it works beyond that it reads /proc, but whatever it does it uses a whole lot more compute than nethogs does (which also displays per process and also uses /proc as the information source). This is fine for most of my machines, but for lower-specced machines I'll probably have to stick with nethogs[1] [1]: https://github.com/raboof/nethogs. - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago

Nethogs(rpm) is a much simpler solution. It's also available on the repos. Source: over 1 year ago

Ngrep is ok, I just use nethogs, nmap and tcpick, and tcpdump with termshark for most network analysis. Source: over 1 year ago

Hello. I'm running linux mint at the moment. And I use a program that check the network sometimes that's called nethogs. https://github.com/raboof/nethogs. Source: almost 3 years ago

I think nethogs might do this if I'm looking at the screenshot properly. Bandwhich appears to show what's being connected to on a per-process basis. Source: about 3 years ago

It uses the psutil library (or can use tracemalloc or posix) to access process information in a cross platform way, so it works on Windows, Mac, and Linux. - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago