Nethogs VS Packet Peeper

Nethogs mentions (5)

• Monitor bandwidth usage with bandwhich (and build a snap package of it)

  I'm not sure how it works beyond that it reads /proc, but whatever it does it uses a whole lot more compute than nethogs does (which also displays per process and also uses /proc as the information source). This is fine for most of my machines, but for lower-specced machines I'll probably have to stick with nethogs[1] [1]: https://github.com/raboof/nethogs. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

• What applications uploaded data?

  Nethogs(rpm) is a much simpler solution. It's also available on the repos. Source: over 1 year ago

• Are there any TUI apps you recommend outside of ncdu / nnn / htop / vim / bat / fd / tig / duf?

  Ngrep is ok, I just use nethogs, nmap and tcpick, and tcpdump with termshark for most network analysis. Source: over 1 year ago

• Has someone hacked my machine, or is it supposed to look like this? Nethogs..

  Hello. I'm running linux mint at the moment. And I use a program that check the network sometimes that's called nethogs. https://github.com/raboof/nethogs. Source: almost 3 years ago

• Looking for a network monitor for Ubuntu to see data transfer rates per process/program

  I think nethogs might do this if I'm looking at the screenshot properly. Bandwhich appears to show what's being connected to on a per-process basis. Source: about 3 years ago

Packet Peeper mentions (0)