The idea of config files is fine, it's the implementation I don't like. I was using NetBSD recently for my senior project and found it fine to use - all the documentation is in one place (well, two - the manpages and netbsd.org). It's when the documentation is nonexistent and you have to search through a million different websites and forum posts to find the one line you have to change - that's what gets me. Linus... Source: over 1 year ago

This is what most of the existing open source operating systems are and it is much easier to contribute to those or fork one that does most of what you want. If you are aiming at a POSIX system then there is a fair amount of work but you at least then get a huge amount of already written software that you can run (IIUC Redox is aiming for this but written in Rust). A structure like Qubes OS would make it easier... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

It looks like one of the vulnerabilities involves being able to sneak in a rogue ICMPv6 route advertisement, with rogue DNS entries. It also mentions doing this kind of stuff against NetBSD 7.1, but that's a couple of versions old, so I guess they were concerned about all the random managed access points floating around? Source: about 3 years ago

Interesting MS-DOS history to be uncovered. FreeDOS, an open source DOS clone, has been around for a while: https://freedos.org/ https://github.com/FDOS. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago

I wonder if that machine can run FreeDOS. Source: about 1 year ago

Some kind of VM with no sharing or network access... VirtualBox, Bottles, or your host of choice... Install DOS (FreeDOS or whatever you wish I guess). Source: about 1 year ago

Then there is FreeDOS, which also isn't Linux, but it is still open source and a lots of fun to use. Source: over 1 year ago

You know you are absolutely right. I’m going back to DOS. Source: over 1 year ago