Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

NanoMQ.io VS CloudMQTT

Compare NanoMQ.io VS CloudMQTT and see what are their differences

Cyclr
Powerful SaaS integration toolkit for SaaS developers - create, amplify, manage and publish native integrations from within your app with Cyclr's flexible Embedded iPaaS. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

NanoMQ.io logo NanoMQ.io

An Ultra-lightweight and Blazing-fast MQTT Broker for IoT Edge

CloudMQTT logo CloudMQTT

CloudMQTT implements MQ Telemetry Transport protocol for carrying out messaging using a publish/subscribe message queueing model.
Not present

NanoMQ MQTT Broker (NanoMQ) is a lightweight and blazing-fast MQTT Broker for the IoT Edge platform.

NanoMQ bases on NNG's asynchronous I/O threading model, with an extension of MQTT support in the protocol layer and reworked transport layer, plus an enhanced asynchronous IO mechanism maximizing the overall capacity.

  • CloudMQTT Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-09-25

NanoMQ.io features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

CloudMQTT features and specs

  • Scalability
    CloudMQTT allows you to scale your connections and usage based on your needs, providing flexibility for growing applications.
  • Managed Infrastructure
    The service provides a fully managed MQTT broker infrastructure, saving time and resources on setup and maintenance.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    CloudMQTT supports multiple platforms and devices, making integration with a variety of applications and services easier.
  • Security
    Offers features like SSL/TLS encryption and authentication mechanisms to ensure secure data transmission and prevent unauthorized access.
  • User Friendly
    The platform offers an easy-to-use interface with comprehensive documentation, making it accessible even for beginners.

Possible disadvantages of CloudMQTT

  • Cost
    While there are different pricing tiers, the cost can increase significantly with higher usage and the need for advanced features.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Relying on a specific service provider can lead to vendor lock-in, making it challenging to switch providers without significant effort and restructuring.
  • Limited Offline Access
    As a cloud-based service, it requires an internet connection, which may not be ideal for applications needing offline capabilities.
  • Customizability
    There might be limitations on customization compared to running a self-hosted MQTT broker, which offers more control over configurations.
  • Dependency on Internet
    The need for constant internet connectivity could be a drawback for applications in environments with unstable or limited internet access.

NanoMQ.io videos

No NanoMQ.io videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

CloudMQTT videos

+ Add

Triggering Sonoff S20 via Amazon Echo and IFTTT/Lambda/CloudMQTT

More videos:

  • Demo - Home Automation Demo: ESP8266 MicroPython, CloudMQTT and IOT MQTT Dashboard android app

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to NanoMQ.io and CloudMQTT)

NanoMQ.io

CloudMQTT

Data Integration
30 30%
Data Integration
70% 70
Web Service Automation
34 34%
Web Service Automation
66% 66
IoT
36 36%
IoT
64% 64
IoT Connectivity
100 100%
IoT Connectivity
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using NanoMQ.io and CloudMQTT. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, CloudMQTT seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

NanoMQ.io mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of NanoMQ.io yet. Tracking of NanoMQ.io recommendations started around Aug 2022.

CloudMQTT mentions (2)

  • A beginner's end-to-end project: Raspberry Pi sensor data to dashboard -- I need some general advice getting started
    If it's IoT data, I would first send it to a Cloud MQTT Broker (cloudmqtt.com or hivemq.com). These brokers handle the spotty unstable connectivity between themselves and MQTT/IoT devices or clients. Other systems will not handle this instability in connectivity very well. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Connecting to Mqtt broker over GSM or cellular network
    I am trying to make a vehicle tracker, So I am using GPS and Gsm module. I am willing to transfer latlong over cellular network through MQTT to Cloudmqtt.com or any similar. Have anyone done similar project ?, Please help. I tried searching on google.. But all I get is for ESP or NodeMCU. Source: almost 4 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing NanoMQ.io and CloudMQTT, you can also consider the following products

HiveMQ - HiveMQ is the MQTT based messaging platform for fast, efficient and reliable data movement to and from connected IoT devices and enterprise systems

RabbitMQ - RabbitMQ is an open source message broker software.

mosquitto - Eclipse Mosquitto is an open source (EPL/EDL licensed) message broker that implements the MQTT protocol versions 5.0, 3.1.1 and 3.1. Mosquitto is lightweight and is suitable for use on all devices

Bevywise CrystalMQ - Hosted MQTT Server with powerful UI, widgets & advanced ML/AI Integration. Dedicated server for data privacy & Security for Industrial & Commercial needs.

Apache Kafka - Apache Kafka is an open-source message broker project developed by the Apache Software Foundation written in Scala.

EMQX Cloud - A fully managed MQTT service that connects your IoT devices to the cloud with reliable, real-time IoT data transmission, processing, and integration. Accelerate business that matters while avoiding the headaches of infrastructure management.

Loading...