Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

MySQL VS Building Engines

Compare MySQL VS Building Engines and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

MySQL logo MySQL

The world's most popular open source database

Building Engines logo Building Engines

Property management software for commercial real estate work orders, preventative maintenance and inspections.
  • MySQL Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-06-17
  • Building Engines Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-27

MySQL features and specs

  • Reliability
    MySQL is known for its reliability and durability, making it a solid choice for many businesses' database management needs.
  • Performance
    It offers robust performance, handling large databases and complex queries efficiently.
  • Open Source
    MySQL is an open-source database, making it freely available under the GNU General Public License (GPL).
  • Scalability
    MySQL supports large-scale applications and can handle high volumes of transactions.
  • Community Support
    There is a large, active MySQL community that offers extensive resources, documentation, and support.
  • Cross-Platform
    MySQL is compatible with various operating systems like Windows, Linux, and macOS.
  • Integrations
    MySQL integrates well with numerous development frameworks, including LAMP (Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP/Python/Perl).
  • Security
    MySQL offers various security features, such as user account management, password policies, and encrypted connections.
  • Cost
    The open-source nature of MySQL means that it can be very cost-effective, especially for small to medium-sized businesses.

Possible disadvantages of MySQL

  • Support
    While community support is plentiful, official support from Oracle can be quite expensive.
  • Complexity
    More advanced features and configurations can be complex and may require a steep learning curve for new users.
  • Scalability Limitations
    While MySQL is scalable, very high-scale applications may run into limitations compared to some newer database technologies.
  • Plug-in Storage Engines
    The use of plug-in storage engines like InnoDB or MyISAM can cause inconsistencies and complicate backups and recovery processes.
  • ACID Compliance
    Although MySQL supports ACID compliance, certain configurations or storage engines may not fully adhere to ACID properties, affecting transaction reliability.
  • Concurrent Writes
    Handling a high number of concurrent writes can be less efficient compared to some other database systems designed specifically for high concurrency.
  • Feature Set
    Some advanced features found in other SQL databases (e.g., full-text indexing, rich analytics) may be less robust or absent.
  • Vendor Dependency
    With Oracle now owning MySQL, there can be concerns about licensing changes or other forms of vendor lock-in.
  • Replication Complexities
    Setting up replication and ensuring data consistency across distributed systems can be complex and error-prone.

Building Engines features and specs

  • Comprehensive Property Management
    Building Engines offers a wide range of features for property management, including maintenance tracking, work order management, and tenant communications, which help streamline operations.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform is designed with a focus on usability, making it easier for property managers and tenants to navigate and utilize its features effectively.
  • Mobile Accessibility
    The availability of a mobile app allows property managers and maintenance teams to access and update information on-the-go, improving responsiveness and efficiency.
  • Data Analytics
    Building Engines provides robust analytics and reporting tools that help property managers make informed decisions based on real-time data and historical trends.
  • Customizability
    The platform allows for a high degree of customization, enabling property managers to tailor the system to their specific operational needs.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Building Engines integrates with various other property management and business software, such as accounting systems and building automation systems, allowing for seamless data flow and operational efficiency.

Possible disadvantages of Building Engines

  • Cost
    Some users may find Building Engines to be relatively expensive compared to other property management solutions, potentially making it less accessible for smaller property management companies.
  • Learning Curve
    While the interface is user-friendly, the extensive features and customization options may require significant time and effort for new users to learn and implement effectively.
  • Customer Support
    There have been occasional reports of slow or unresponsive customer support, which could be a drawback for users who need timely assistance.
  • Complexity for Small Properties
    The extensive features and robust capabilities of Building Engines might be overkill for smaller properties or simpler management needs, leading to underutilization of the platform.
  • Frequency of Updates
    Frequent updates and new features, while generally positive, can sometimes lead to temporary stability issues or bugs, which can disrupt daily operations.

Analysis of MySQL

Overall verdict

  • Yes, MySQL is generally considered to be a good choice for many applications, especially those requiring a relational database management system. Its performance, ease of integration, and support for various storage engines make it a versatile option.

Why this product is good

  • MySQL is a popular open-source relational database management system known for its reliability, ease of use, and strong community support. It has a proven track record and is widely used for web applications, data warehousing, and logging applications. Additionally, MySQL offers robust security features, scalability, and cross-platform support.

Recommended for

  • Small to medium-sized web applications
  • LAMP stack environments
  • E-commerce platforms
  • Logging and data warehousing applications
  • Projects requiring a mature, well-supported RDBMS

Analysis of Building Engines

Overall verdict

  • Building Engines is generally well-regarded in the property management industry. It is considered a reliable and effective tool for managing various property management tasks. While overall satisfaction is high, users should assess their specific needs and evaluate how Building Engines aligns with their operational goals.

Why this product is good

  • Building Engines is a property management platform designed to enhance operational efficiency, improve communication, and optimize tenant services. It offers a range of features such as work order management, tenant engagement, inspection tools, and preventive maintenance. Its user-friendly interface, robust reporting capabilities, and scalable solutions make it a strong option for property managers seeking to streamline operations and enhance tenant satisfaction.

Recommended for

  • Commercial property managers aiming to enhance operational efficiency
  • Facility management teams looking for an integrated solution
  • Property managers seeking to improve tenant communication and satisfaction
  • Organizations wanting to optimize preventive maintenance and inspection workflows

MySQL videos

MySQL IN 10 MINUTES (2020) | Introduction to Databases, SQL, & MySQL

More videos:

  • Review - A Review of MySQL Open Source Software

Building Engines videos

No Building Engines videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MySQL and Building Engines)
Databases
100 100%
0% 0
Property Management
0 0%
100% 100
Relational Databases
100 100%
0% 0
Rental Property Management

User comments

Share your experience with using MySQL and Building Engines. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare MySQL and Building Engines

MySQL Reviews

MariaDB Vs MySQL In 2019: Compatibility, Performance, And Syntax
MySQL: MySQL is an open-source relational database management system (RDBMS). Just like all other relational databases, MySQL uses tables, constraints, triggers, roles, stored procedures and views as the core components that you work with. A table consists of rows, and each row contains a same set of columns. MySQL uses primary keys to uniquely identify each row (a.k.a...
Source: blog.panoply.io
20+ MongoDB Alternatives You Should Know About
MySQL® is another feasible replacement. MySQL 5.7 and MySQL 8 have great support for JSON, and it continues to get better with every maintenance release. You can also consider MySQL Cluster for medium size sharded environments. You can also consider MariaDB and Percona Server for MySQL
Source: www.percona.com

Building Engines Reviews

We have no reviews of Building Engines yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, MySQL seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

MySQL mentions (4)

  • I have a recurring issue with a MySQL DB where I continually run out of disk space due to logs being filled. I've tried everything I can think of. Can anyone think of anything else I should try?
    So, I did a quick read through the mysql reference and found a bunch of flush related commands. I tried:. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • MMORPG design resources
    MySQL: Any SQL or DB knock-off, really... mysql.com - mariadb.org - sqlite.org. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Probably a syntax error
    15 years and five strokes ago. I was a Unix sysadmin. ALthough I was never an actual programmer, I did maintenance/light enhancement for the organization's website, in php. Now, as self-administered cognative therapy, I'm going back to it. This is an evil HR application that uses the mysql.com employees sample database. The module below enables the evil HR end user to generate a list of the oldest workers so... Source: almost 4 years ago
  • An absolute nightmare with mysql 8.0.25
    I always use the packages from mysql.com, that way I don't have to deal with strange configuration stuff along those lines, but anyway, I'm afraid I'm out of ideas. Surely someone else would have run in to the same issue here though. Source: almost 4 years ago

Building Engines mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Building Engines yet. Tracking of Building Engines recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MySQL and Building Engines, you can also consider the following products

PostgreSQL - PostgreSQL is a powerful, open source object-relational database system.

Yardi Voyager - Voyager is software for managing properties and the people who live there. The software is developed by Yardi, a company founded in 1984 that specializes in property management software. Read more about Yardi Voyager.

Microsoft SQL - Microsoft SQL is a best in class relational database management software that facilitates the database server to provide you a primary function to store and retrieve data.

Innago - Innago offers a cloud-based property management platform for landlords with small to midsize property portfolios. Innago is 100% free to use and comes with a long list of affordable features.

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

AppFolio - AppFolio is the premier online property management software for modern residential and rental property managers. Try it free today.