MX Linux VS Garuda Linux
Compare MX Linux VS Garuda Linux and see what are their differences
Scan Azure and AWS resources against 621 policy rules. Auto-remediate findings, track compliance frameworks, integrate via API.
featured
MX Linux
Linux Mint
Manjaro
elementary OS
Fedora
PsychOS
Pop!_OS
Solus OS
Garuda Linux
Pop!_OS
EndeavourOS
Manjaro
Linux Mint
Anarchy Linux
Fedora
Arch Linux
MX Linux Garuda LinuxGaruda Linux is recommended for gamers, new Linux users who want a polished and easy-to-use environment, and those who appreciate a cutting-edge, rolling-release distribution. It is also suitable for users who enjoy customizing their Linux setup and require system recovery options due to its user-friendly tools and extensive documentation.
Garuda linux boots superfast on my laptop, is very userfriendly both in daily work and maintenance. You can find and install a vast amount of software and apps. It is stable and aesthetically pleasing.
Garuda Linux might be a bit more popular than MX Linux. We know about 96 links to it since March 2021 and only 91 links to MX Linux. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
Does one really care? Have you looked at https://www.clearlinux.org/ https://github.com/clearlinux https://github.com/CachyOS https://github.com/MX-Linux ? Would they lack anything? I picked these three specifically because I tested them recently on new hardware I got. What they have in common is their focus on encapsulating 4. For mere mortals, while not doing 5, or at... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
I like Manjaro XFCE, it's rolling updates so it's as packages come out you can update to the newest (it pulls latest from github, but has other repos) if you want oldschool oldschool, check out antiX linux, MX Linux is based on AntiX but looks semi-better, they're based on Debian. Remember though, debian is like 5 package versions behind, because that's what they do with their auditing for stability. MX Linux has... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
If you want something new you probably want to aim light. I'd opt for AntiX full version as it's very light, stable and comes with a variety of lightweight desktops, themes and other stuff to choose from at login. The sister project MXLinux could also be worth a look for a more traditional system, but I'd try the Fluxbox option to keep things light. Source: about 3 years ago
I'm getting an error of - Could not find file antiX/linuxfs - searched devices /dev/sdc1 /dev/sdb1 etc. Gives me an ooption to contact Bitjam at mxlinux.org and then says P=power off, r=reboot. I've tried to look around but I'm not finding any details on what's going on. There was a mention of bad hardware, but if my other ISO's are booting no problem I dont think that is the issue. Source: about 3 years ago
I thought I would never say this, but I think you should try the KDE edition of https://mxlinux.org/. Source: about 3 years ago
My son, and his friends all seem to have switched to https://garudalinux.org/ recently for gaming. Seems to be working out well for them. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
CatchyOS is great, been using it for months and been good overall. There is also garuda linux, it looks great too, only tested it for a little though, worth trying if you are in your distro-hopping phase: https://garudalinux.org. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
I'd suggest trying Nobara and/or Garuda - both are absolutely easymode to install from a USB stick, and are specifically configured for gaming, but have a pretty different look and feel. Nobara is a very plain, kind of old fashioned, plain feeling UI (it rather reminds me of Windows 2000 in some ways, although it's much more advanced of course) while Garuda showcases just how fancy your desktop can look. Source: about 3 years ago
Garuda (Arch based, use a Desktop environment with small memory prints like XFCE or lxqt). Source: about 3 years ago
Personally, I feel like rolling release distros 'should' include a properly configured (GRUB-)Btrfs+Timeshit/Snapper by default. This will enable the user to rollback to a working system whenever a breakage occurs; even from the GRUB-menu. As the 'unadulterated' Arch is a blank slate upon which you 'should' tinker to your heart's content, it doesn't do this by default. However, you're highly encouraged to set it... Source: about 3 years ago
Linux Mint - Linux Mint is one of the most popular desktop Linux distributions and used by millions of people.
Pop!_OS - A developer-focused minimalist Linux distro from System 76
Manjaro - Manjaro Linux is a linux distribution which is based on arch linux. It uses the PACMAN package manager.
EndeavourOS - An Arch-based distro with a dynamic and friendly community in its core
elementary OS - A fast and open replacement for Windows and macOS. Pay what you want or download for free.
Fedora - Fedora creates an innovative, free, and open source platform for hardware, clouds, and containers that enables software developers and community members to build tailored solutions for their users.