Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

musicForProgramming(); VS Google Year in Search 2017

Compare musicForProgramming(); VS Google Year in Search 2017 and see what are their differences

musicForProgramming(); logo musicForProgramming();

Mixes intended for listening while programming

Google Year in Search 2017 logo Google Year in Search 2017

See what was trending in 2017 through Google searches
  • musicForProgramming(); Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-04
  • Google Year in Search 2017 Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-07

musicForProgramming(); features and specs

  • Curated Playlist
    The site offers a curated playlist of tracks that are specifically selected to enhance focus and productivity while programming.
  • Minimalist Design
    The website features a simple, distraction-free design that allows users to quickly access and play music without interruptions.
  • Free Access
    Users can access and listen to the playlists for free, making it an accessible option for programmers on a budget.
  • Diverse Music Selection
    The playlists encompass a wide variety of electronic and ambient genres, providing diverse soundscapes to suit different programming moods.

Possible disadvantages of musicForProgramming();

  • Limited Customization
    Users cannot create or customize playlists, which may not suit those who prefer a more personalized listening experience.
  • No Offline Listening
    The service is web-based, so users need an active internet connection to access the playlists, which can be limiting in offline scenarios.
  • Playlist Repetition
    Over time, the fixed set of playlists may become repetitive for users who use the service frequently.
  • No Mobile App
    Lack of a mobile app may limit user convenience and accessibility on smartphones compared to dedicated music streaming services.

Google Year in Search 2017 features and specs

  • Comprehensive Insights
    Google Year in Search 2017 provides a detailed overview of the most popular search queries globally and by category, highlighting significant events and trends throughout the year.
  • Cultural Reflection
    It serves as a cultural reflection, showing what topics captured the public's attention and concern, thus offering a unique glimpse into societal priorities and issues of that year.
  • User Engagement
    The interactive nature of the Year in Search encourages user engagement, allowing people to explore data and trends in an accessible and visually appealing format.
  • Historical Record
    It acts as a historical record, archiving what was important to people around the world, making it a useful reference for future analysis and comparison.

Possible disadvantages of Google Year in Search 2017

  • Privacy Concerns
    Aggregating search data, even anonymously, raises concerns about user privacy and the ethical use of personal data.
  • Regional Bias
    The global trends might underrepresent local or regional differences, as more populated regions could dominate the data, overshadowing specific local interests or events.
  • Limited Context
    While offering a list of popular searches, the Year in Search does not always provide context or reasons behind why certain topics were popular, leaving some interpretations to speculation.
  • Static Snapshot
    The Year in Search provides a static snapshot of trends for that particular year, which might not reflect ongoing trends or changes that continue beyond the end of the year.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to musicForProgramming(); and Google Year in Search 2017)
Music
77 77%
23% 23
Productivity
100 100%
0% 0
Music Streaming
0 0%
100% 100
Spotify
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using musicForProgramming(); and Google Year in Search 2017. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, musicForProgramming(); seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 21 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

musicForProgramming(); mentions (21)

  • TTE: Terminal Text Effects
    Amazing. I’ve seen similar effects used in production on https://musicforprogramming.net/ which looks like the RandomSequence effect. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • A rust utility to play music mixes from musicforprogramming.net directly in your terminal
    I enjoy listening to mixes from musicforprogramming.net while coding. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • do you listen to music while coding/studying?
    Usually, no, but have sometimes used the SpaceChem soundtrack and https://musicforprogramming.net. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Datasette is my data hammer
    I did, too :) For those that don't know: Datasette is the author/curator of https://musicforprogramming.net. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago
  • Here’s a playlist of 7 hours of music I use to focus when I’m coding/developing. Post yours as well if you also have one!
    Check out https://musicforprogramming.net/. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

Google Year in Search 2017 mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Google Year in Search 2017 yet. Tracking of Google Year in Search 2017 recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing musicForProgramming(); and Google Year in Search 2017, you can also consider the following products

SomaFM - 28 unique channels of radio broadcasting from San Francisco

Spotify Taste Rewind - What your music taste would have been like in past decades

Endel.io - Personalized sounds to help you focus and relax

Spotify.me - Beautiful analytics on your Spotify listening habits 🎧

volt.fm - See your Spotify stats, connect with 125k+ music fans, and discover new music.⠀volt.fm helps you experience Spotify in a totally new way.

Transistor.fm - Podcast hosting and analytics for creatives: start unlimited shows 🎙️