Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

MultiBrowser VS Hurl - Choose a Browser

Compare MultiBrowser VS Hurl - Choose a Browser and see what are their differences

Flowlu
All-in-one work management platform for team collaboration. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

MultiBrowser logo MultiBrowser

Responsive Web Design, Mobile & Cross-Browser Compatibility Testing Software.

Hurl - Choose a Browser logo Hurl - Choose a Browser

A windows utility that lets you choose the browser on the click of a link
  • MultiBrowser Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-22
  • Hurl - Choose a Browser Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-07

MultiBrowser features and specs

  • Comprehensive Testing
    MultiBrowser allows users to test websites across a wide range of browsers and devices, ensuring compatibility and performance for different user environments.
  • Automation Features
    It offers automation capabilities that help streamline testing processes, saving time and reducing the risk of human error during repetitive tests.
  • Live Testing
    MultiBrowser provides real-time testing options that enable developers to view and interact with a website as it would appear on various platforms, facilitating quick debugging and adjustments.
  • Local and Cloud Testing
    Users can choose between local testing environments or cloud-based tests, offering flexibility in resource usage and accessibility.

Possible disadvantages of MultiBrowser

  • Cost
    Some users may find the pricing of MultiBrowser to be on the higher side compared to alternatives, especially for small businesses or individual developers.
  • Learning Curve
    New users might experience a steep learning curve when trying to utilize all the features and capabilities, which can slow down initial productivity.
  • System Resource Usage
    Running multiple concurrent tests or using advanced features can consume significant system resources, which may affect performance on lower-end hardware.
  • Limited Free Trial
    The duration or feature restrictions of the free trial might not be sufficient for some users to fully explore and evaluate the software before making a purchase decision.

Hurl - Choose a Browser features and specs

  • Open Source
    Hurl is open source, meaning users can contribute to its development, ensuring transparency and continuous improvement.
  • Customizability
    Being open-source and hosted on GitHub, users can modify the browser to better suit their needs or preferences.
  • Community Support
    Users have access to a community of developers and users who can help troubleshoot issues or provide guidance.
  • Learning Opportunity
    For developers and technical users, Hurl provides an opportunity to learn more about browser development and contribute to an active project.

Possible disadvantages of Hurl - Choose a Browser

  • Limited Features
    As a less established project, Hurl may not have as many features as mainstream browsers, potentially lacking some functionality users expect.
  • Stability
    Being a lesser-known browser, Hurl might not be as stable as more mature browsers like Chrome or Firefox, possibly leading to more frequent crashes or bugs.
  • Smaller Community
    A smaller user base compared to popular browsers means slower identification of bugs and potentially slower development progress.
  • Compatibility
    There might be compatibility issues with some websites or extensions that are optimized for major browsers.

Analysis of MultiBrowser

Overall verdict

  • MultiBrowser is considered a solid option for developers and QA professionals looking for an all-encompassing tool for browser testing. Its ability to perform local testing without external dependencies can be advantageous for projects that require secure test environments.

Why this product is good

  • MultiBrowser is praised for its comprehensive suite of testing tools that facilitate cross-browser testing, bug capturing, and responsive design evaluation. It enables developers to ensure their web applications are compatible across different browsers and devices, thus improving user experience.

Recommended for

  • Web developers and designers seeking to ensure cross-browser compatibility
  • QA teams looking for efficient tools to automate browser testing
  • Organizations with a need to test web applications in a secure, local environment
  • Projects requiring thorough responsive design checks across multiple device categories

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to MultiBrowser and Hurl - Choose a Browser)

MultiBrowser

Hurl - Choose a Browser

Website Testing
67 67%
Website Testing
33% 33
Browser Testing
100 100%
Browser Testing
0% 0
Project Management
0 0%
Project Management
100% 100
Automated Testing
100 100%
Automated Testing
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using MultiBrowser and Hurl - Choose a Browser. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing MultiBrowser and Hurl - Choose a Browser, you can also consider the following products

browserling - Live interactive cross-browser testing from your browser.

Browser Tamer - Makes correct URLs open in browsers you want instead of the system defaults.

CrossBrowserTesting - Browser Testing made simple! Run automated, visual, and manual tests on 1500+ real browsers and mobile devices. Test more browsers, in less time.

Choosy - Choosy opens links in different browsers as specified, according to rules, set by the user.

Browsershots - Browsershots makes screenshots of your web design in different browsers.

Junction - Choose the application to open files and links

Loading...