Based on our record, CommonCrawl seems to be a lot more popular than morph.io. While we know about 90 links to CommonCrawl, we've tracked only 1 mention of morph.io. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
This is the one I know about: https://morph.io/ and https://github.com/openaustralia/morph#readme (AGPLv3) -- they used to be at the intersection of "heroku for scrapers" and DoltHub (e.g. https://www.dolthub.com/repositories/dolthub/us-businesses/data/master/businesses) since the scrapers would run but then make their data available as CSV or sqlite or whatever. But, when I just tried to load one of the morph.io... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
Https://commoncrawl.org/ is a non-profit which offers a pre-crawled dataset. The specifics of individual tools probably vary. I imagine most tools would be based on academic datasets. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
Should the NYT not sue https://commoncrawl.org/ ? OpenAI just used the data from commoncrawl for training. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
What you’re likely referring to is Common Crawl: https://commoncrawl.org. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
> ... a project called "Nutch" would allow web users to crawl the web themselves. Perhaps that promise is similar to the promises being made about "AI" today. The project did not turn out to be used in the way it was predicted (marketed), or even used by web users at all. Actually Nutch is used to produce the Common Crawl[0] and 60% of GPT-3's training data was Common Crawl[1], so in a way it is being used... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
> Let's share the index as public data Common crawl[1] data has been in AWS for over a decade. [1]: https://commoncrawl.org. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago