Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Monstra CMS VS Automad

Compare Monstra CMS VS Automad and see what are their differences

Monstra CMS logo Monstra CMS

Fast and small flat-file content management system written in PHP!

Automad logo Automad

A File-Based & Open Source Content Management System
  • Monstra CMS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-17
  • Automad Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-16

Monstra CMS features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Monstra CMS is designed to be lightweight and fast, which makes it suitable for small to medium websites without a lot of overhead.
  • Easy to Install
    The CMS has a simple installation process, making it easy for users to get started without requiring extensive technical knowledge.
  • Flat-File System
    Monstra uses a flat-file system instead of a traditional database, which simplifies the backup process and means no database setup is required.
  • Extendable
    With a variety of plugins and themes available, Monstra offers flexibility for customization and the ability to add new features.
  • SEO Friendly
    It includes built-in SEO tools to help improve search engine rankings.
  • Open Source
    Monstra is open-source software, allowing users to modify and distribute it according to their needs.

Possible disadvantages of Monstra CMS

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more robust CMS platforms, Monstra's feature set is limited, which might not meet the needs of larger and more complex websites.
  • Smaller Community
    Monstra has a smaller user community, which can result in less community support and fewer third-party resources.
  • Plugin Availability
    While extendable, Monstra's plugin ecosystem is not as vast as those of other CMS platforms, which might limit functionality.
  • Less Documentation
    Documentation for Monstra may not be as comprehensive or frequently updated compared to larger CMSs, posing challenges for new users.

Automad features and specs

  • Simple Setup
    Automad has a straightforward installation process, requiring no database setup, which makes it easy for non-technical users to get a site up and running.
  • Lightweight
    As a flat-file CMS, Automad does not require a database server, making it lightweight and fast in terms of performance.
  • Flexibility
    Automad supports a variety of templates and themes, which provides versatility for different types of websites, from blogs to business sites.
  • Modular System
    Automad's modular content blocks allow users to easily customize and build complex page layouts without extensive coding knowledge.
  • Version Control Friendly
    As it uses flat files for storage, it integrates well with version control systems like Git, making content tracking and management convenient.
  • Extensibility
    Automad supports extending functionalities through custom plugins and templates, allowing more advanced users to enhance its capabilities.
  • Built-in Search
    Automad includes a built-in search feature which can be easily integrated into websites to help users find content quickly.
  • Open Source
    Being open-source, it offers transparency, community support, and the ability for developers to contribute to its improvement.

Possible disadvantages of Automad

  • Learning Curve
    While simple in setup, understanding Automad's templating system and modular approach may require some time and effort, especially for new users.
  • Limited Plugin Library
    Compared to more established CMSs like WordPress, Automad has a smaller plugin ecosystem, which can limit functionality for some users.
  • Community Support
    As a less popular CMS, Automad has a smaller community, which means fewer tutorials, forums, and third-party resources for troubleshooting.
  • Scalability
    While suitable for smaller sites, Automad's flat-file structure may face performance issues when handling a very large amount of content or high traffic.
  • Feature Limitations
    Compared to more mature CMS platforms, Automad lacks some advanced features out-of-the-box, which may necessitate additional customization.
  • Lack of Professional Themes
    The availability of professionally designed themes is limited, which can be restrictive for users looking for premium design options out-of-the-box.
  • Content Management Interface
    The backend interface is simpler, which is good for ease-of-use but can be limiting for experienced users looking for more sophisticated management tools.

Monstra CMS videos

Monstra CMS

More videos:

  • Tutorial - How to install Monstra CMS on CentOS 6.9

Automad videos

No Automad videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Monstra CMS and Automad)
Blogging
50 50%
50% 50
CMS
30 30%
70% 70
Blogging Platform
37 37%
63% 63
Development
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Monstra CMS and Automad. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Automad seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 6 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Monstra CMS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Monstra CMS yet. Tracking of Monstra CMS recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Automad mentions (6)

  • Automatic Cookie Consent Banners in Automad
    Automad now detects when a page has embedded third-party content that potentially sets cookies — like an embedded YouTube video or Soundcloud song — and displays a consent banner only when it’s necessary. If your page doesn’t include anything privacy-sensitive, no banner is shown at all. Simple as that. - Source: dev.to / 14 days ago
  • The Inflation of "Security Researchers" and Its Consequences for Open Source
    A perfect example of this issue happened last year when I received multiple CVE notifications about a supposed cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Automad. The reports claimed that a non-sanitized input field could be exploited to inject JavaScript. However, these reports completely misunderstood the nature of the project. Automad is designed as a single-user content management system, meaning there are no... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Why Automad No Longer Uses Any Frontend or Backend Framework
    Automad's decision to move away from frontend and backend frameworks is driven by a long-term vision of stability, maintainability, and independence. While frameworks provide immediate benefits, they also introduce long-term risks that are incompatible with the goals of an open-source CMS that seeks to remain lightweight, flexible, and future-proof. By leveraging native solutions, Automad ensures a stable... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Setting Up Neovim for Automad Theme Development
    As the developer of the Automad flat-file content management system, I wanted to make working with Automad themes in Neovim as smooth as possible. Automad has its own templating syntax, so I created tree-sitter-automad to provide proper syntax highlighting. Since it’s not yet an official parser, you need to manually register it in Neovim. To speed up template writing, you can also add custom snippets using... - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • How to Create a Multilingual Website Using Automad 2
    Setting up a multilingual website with Automad 2 is simple and straightforward. By creating language-specific landing pages, modifying slugs to match language codes, and enabling language routing, you can effectively manage and deliver content in multiple languages. With Automad’s clean and intuitive interface, it’s easy to expand your reach to a global audience without overwhelming complexity. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Monstra CMS and Automad, you can also consider the following products

Bludit - Bludit is a web application to build your own website or blog in seconds, it's completely free and open source. Markdown support.

Sitecake - Drag and drop CMS for HTML websites. It's flat file CMS so it's pretty fast.

Grav - The modern open source flat-file CMS

ClassicPress - The WordPress fork. No Gutenberg. Great future!

BoidCMS - Flat file CMS for building simple websites and blogs.

TYPO3 - TYPO3.com - Infos, SLAs, Extended Support Versions and more